Re: [Lazarus] Resources on Windows

2010-07-29 Thread Paul Ishenin
30.07.2010 9:07, Alexander Klenin wrote: No, Project Options -> OK did not change .lpr file in any way. .res file did not appear either. This means that you have no resources: no manifest, no icon, no version information. Remove the old rc and manifest files if they are present and add a n

Re: [Lazarus] Resources on Windows

2010-07-29 Thread Alexander Klenin
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:25, Paul Ishenin wrote: > 29.07.2010 17:35, Alexander Klenin wrote: > >> Hm, so should I take the patch from the bug report as is >> (it just deletes $IFDEF line), or should I add $R line instead? >> I have just verified that all projects compile fine without $R -- >> is

Re: [Lazarus] Resources on Windows

2010-07-29 Thread Paul Ishenin
29.07.2010 17:35, Alexander Klenin wrote: Hm, so should I take the patch from the bug report as is (it just deletes $IFDEF line), or should I add $R line instead? I have just verified that all projects compile fine without $R -- is it really needed? Just open the project in the IDE, go to proj

Re: [Lazarus] Resources on Windows

2010-07-29 Thread Alexander Klenin
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 13:10, Paul Ishenin wrote: > 29.07.2010 8:08, Alexander Klenin wrote: >> >> However, my question is -- is this yet another incompatible change >> made without any warning? Or did I miss it? > > I wrote about this change here: > http://lazarus-dev.blogspot.com/2010/02/work-o

Re: [Lazarus] Resources on Windows

2010-07-28 Thread Paul Ishenin
29.07.2010 8:08, Alexander Klenin wrote: However, my question is -- is this yet another incompatible change made without any warning? Or did I miss it? I wrote about this change here: http://lazarus-dev.blogspot.com/2010/02/work-on-0930-changes-in-resource.html The problem is that previosly

[Lazarus] Resources on Windows

2010-07-28 Thread Alexander Klenin
Please somebody look at http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=17054 I have verified that the patch applies and demos are still compilable after it (they compiled for me before the patch because I had the .rc files). However, my question is -- is this yet another incompatible change made without a