Hi,
We had an discussion about the OnDropFiles implementation in german
lazarus forum lately.
And most people had the meaning that the current implementation is not
so good.
The main problem is that it is impossible to drop files to special
controls. In most cases the people dont
need the
Christian U. wrote:
The second thing is I think it is not very LCLisch. I think an correct
implementation add an OnDropFiles event to TWinControl or
TCustomControl and not to TForm.
I think we should think twice about these and implement it bevore 1.0
after that we shouldnt break existing
Paul Ishenin schrieb:
Christian U. wrote:
The second thing is I think it is not very LCLisch. I think an
correct implementation add an OnDropFiles event to TWinControl or
TCustomControl and not to TForm.
I think we should think twice about these and implement it bevore 1.0
after that we
On Jan 20, 2008, at 8:00 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 20/01/2008, Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I better understand with all these explanations. Thanks to all !
Again, I disagree. ;-) I did a study on this. I opened a random set
of applications that have things like File
Marc Weustink wrote:
ik wrote:
Hi,
While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android,
there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko
(http://openmoko.org/).
I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building
apps in different compilers (FPC to be exact, and
Marc Weustink schrieb:
Marc Weustink wrote:
ik wrote:
Hi,
While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android,
there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko
(http://openmoko.org/).
I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building
apps in different
Am Sonntag, den 20.01.2008, 09:00 +0200 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
Always speaking about GTK-bugs but what about fpGUI bugs ?
When using Lazarus and the LCL, the underlying toolkits are not under
your control. It's quick and easy to fix fpGUI bugs. You can't fix
Win32 native component bugs
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Great!
(not that I grasp the full implications of oabi vs. eabi, but I'd like
to make some experiment with my n800, which is an eabi system).
Bye
--
Hi all,
I've just started testing a couple of application originally written on my XP
machine on Linux (CentOS4) running in a virtual machine. I noticed that some
things seem to be a little slow.
Particularly, there is a form with a stringgrid on it and highlighting a new row
seems to
On 20/01/2008, Marco van de Voort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparantly the only person with skills to run into that started his own
widgetset :-)
It didn't even take a lot of effort to hit those problems... Just
write commercial software. :-) Good news is that some day Lazarus
will benefit
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports, I'll try to
fix them.
Great!
(not that I grasp the full
Lord Satan wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:33:53 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think having a
custom Object Pascal written toolkit for Lazarus is the way to go. The
LCL would have progressed and stabilized much faster if the Lazarus
developers did that from the
Lord Satan wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:33:53 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think having a
custom Object Pascal written toolkit for Lazarus is the way to go. The
LCL would have progressed and stabilized much faster if the Lazarus
developers did that from the start.
Lord Satan schrieb:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:33:53 +0200 Graeme Geldenhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think having a custom Object Pascal written toolkit for
Lazarus is the way to go. The LCL would have progressed and
stabilized much faster if the Lazarus developers did that from the
On 21/01/2008, Lord Satan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stupid Lazarus developers. Now we only get this sucking Win API, GTK1,
GTK2, Carbon and QT. Nothing really works and all is full of bugs.
I agree with Luiz. Lazarus developers are *not* stupid. They have
done an amazing job so far in getting
On Jan 19, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Damien Gerard wrote:
n := FTimerData.Count;
while (n0) do begin
dec(n);
It seems FTimerData is not properly set. Is it possible ? May be
it is
related to some bad behavior of my application (I really don't
know what
but it
16 matches
Mail list logo
