On Nov 2, 2007 9:05 PM, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is this really necessary? Isn't stripping symbols from the end
> > executable enougth?
>
> It's necessary, because -O2 code is usually more compact and faster; but
> hard to debug.
Has anyone ever made a comparation of -O1 and -
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On 11/1/07, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If then, the application is compiled in Release mode, automatically, the
>> "release" version of e.g. the LCL/RTL/FCL would be used, which were
>> compiled with -O2 for instance, while the debug version wa
On 11/1/07, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If then, the application is compiled in Release mode, automatically, the
> "release" version of e.g. the LCL/RTL/FCL would be used, which were
> compiled with -O2 for instance, while the debug version was compiled
> with '-O- -g' or similar.
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:19:05 +0100
> Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If then, the application is compiled in Release mode, automatically,
>> the "release" version of e.g. the LCL/RTL/FCL would be used, which
>> were compiled with -O2 for instance, while the
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:19:05 +0100
Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> > If the compiler options dialog is to be redesigned I think it would
> > be an oportunity to get customized build modes, like: Release,
> > Debug, AnythingElse
>
> This is indeed a
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> If the compiler options dialog is to be redesigned I think it would be
> an oportunity to get customized build modes, like: Release, Debug,
> AnythingElse
This is indeed a good idea, but it would be even better to have
something so that we can even have two ins
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 16:11:26 +0100
"Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/28/07, Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I mentioned in another post. Maybe take a look at MSEide for
> > ideas of such a dialog.
>
> The mseide approach is too simple. Further it
On 10/28/07, Graeme Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I mentioned in another post. Maybe take a look at MSEide for ideas
> of such a dialog.
The mseide approach is too simple. Further it doesn't allow any number
of build modes, but is fixed at 4.
The mseide dialog works like this:
There
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 28/10/2007, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We can provide 2 defaults for new projects: Debug and Release, but
even those should be editable so projects don't need "dead" modes
which are just there by IDE idiosincrasy
I gave some thougth to it
As I mentioned in another post. Maybe take a look at MSEide for ideas
of such a dialog.
Graeme.
On 28/10/2007, Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 06:21:04AM +0100, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> > If the compiler options dialog is to be redesigned I thi
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 06:21:04AM +0100, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> If the compiler options dialog is to be redesigned I think it would be
> an oportunity to get customized build modes, like: Release, Debug,
> AnythingElse
Yes, and additional should be definable by the user.
__
On 28/10/2007, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We can provide 2 defaults for new projects: Debug and Release, but
> even those should be editable so projects don't need "dead" modes
> which are just there by IDE idiosincrasy
>
> I gave some thougth to it, but I am not real
On 10/28/07, Ciprian Mustiata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, the all issues I've previously said are focusing on next things:
> - reduce the number of items (the rarely used items should be cleanup or
> removed or merged)
> - make all consistent (means when you go to one dialog and learn it, th
If the compiler options dialog is to be redesigned I think it would be
an oportunity to get customized build modes, like: Release, Debug,
AnythingElse
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
ent: S 27.10.2007 17:05
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Subject: Re: [lazarus] Usability issues
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - compiler options aren't a part of project options? Why? Probably
> the options should be organized
essage-
From: Mattias Gaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: D 28.10.2007 02:30
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Subject: Re: [lazarus] Usability issues - search
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 01:59:07 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
&
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 01:59:07 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
> "Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - file->search or replace (excluding incremental search) are to
> > heavy Unify them in the same dialog and if the replace/se
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 01:42:07 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]a directly way to solve: add a button
> that say: Solve... or something like that, and when you click it, it
> gets a directory chooser to say where is FPCSRC folder.
Good idea.
Any volunteer?
Mattias
___
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - file->search or replace (excluding incremental search) are to heavy
> Unify them in the same dialog and if the replace/search (like is
> in: Find in Files dialog) work differently on different criteria: by
> pro
-Original Message-
From: Mattias Gaertner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: S 27.10.2007 16:13
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Subject: Re: [lazarus] Usability issues - Warning about missing FPC sources
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:17:17 +0200
Bogusław Brandys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
> > "Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> - Project menu:
> >> - no items until the: publish project should exist, they are
> >> redu
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Project menu:
- no items until the: publish project should exist, they are
redundant with File Menu where most users will make that operations
new project: is unneeded nowadays, altho
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [lazarus] Usability issues - Docking
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- floating windows: they are really too many, In a debug session one
person can work with as much as 10 windows
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - compiler options aren't a part of project options? Why? Probably
> the options should be organized then in another format like some
> tools use today: a logical tree with options and on the right the
> options t
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Project menu:
> - no items until the: publish project should exist, they are
> redundant with File Menu where most users will make that operations
new project: is unneeded nowadays, although I still use it.
n
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - file->search or replace (excluding incremental search) are to heavy
> Unify them in the same dialog and if the replace/search (like is
> in: Find in Files dialog) work differently on different criteria: by
> pro
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - file->New... dialog is somehow useless: for adding one new file the
> user has to open one dialog. Most users will always use three or so
> options. So New... probably should be an expanded menu that have as
> ite
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - floating windows: they are really too many, In a debug session one
> person can work with as much as 10 windows opened at one time. That
> problem can be addressed compacting one or more windows in the same
> dial
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0300
"Ciprian Mustiata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Lazarus team,
>
> I've start Lazarus and I've face multiple usability issues:
It's better to put only one topic per mail.
> - when it start it say that I have no FPC Sources (I've setup them)
> but sometimes
29 matches
Mail list logo
