On 03/26/10 18:00, Mike Gerdts wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:58 PM, wrote:
>
>> On 03/26/10 15:50, Mike Gerdts wrote:
>>
>>> I see the following was just put back, but I am having troubles making
>>> sense of the purpose.
>>>
>>> FWARC/2010/054 VIO vNet/vSwitch support for Rx Dring
On 03/26/10 15:50, Mike Gerdts wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:33 PM, wrote:
>
>> On 07/09/09 12:11, Mike Gerdts wrote:
>>
>>> In looking through the Logical Domains 1.2 Release Notes I see
>>> references to the following bugs:
>>>
>>> 6486234 LDoms Vsw and Vnet need to use direct mapped
On 02/04/10 12:21, Tony MacDoodle wrote:
> Using LDom's 1.3.. This can be accomplished with VLAN Tagging of
> both the vitrual switch and vnet? Correct?
Correct. For the case you mentioned below, if only the guests need to be
in those vlans, you don't need to assign the virtual switch to thos
On 02/04/10 12:00, Tony MacDoodle wrote:
> I have 2 Guest domains that access 2 different networks:
> 11.11.116.0
> 11.11.117.0
>
> Is it possible to route these 2 guest domain addresses through one
> virtual switch? This means 1 physical nic port will be mapped to a
> virtual switch and VLAN tag
On 01/04/10 07:41, Steve Goldthorpe wrote:
> Thanks Mike but I don't think the pvid of the switch and the default-vlan-id
> are exactly the same. I think you need to set the default-vlan-id properly
> to allow an LDom to use that VLAN.
>
> Example Config:
> Physical switch configured with untagg
On 07/09/09 12:11, Mike Gerdts wrote:
> In looking through the Logical Domains 1.2 Release Notes I see
> references to the following bugs:
>
> 6486234 LDoms Vsw and Vnet need to use direct mapped shared memory
> Dring data buffers for performance
> 6683084 VIO Drivers need to use direct mapped shar
On 01/20/09 03:55, Brett Carr wrote:
> Ok So I have just installed the new version of LDOM and am having a small
> jumpstart problem.
>
> DHCP and Jumpstart are on a seperate server on the same network and work fine
> for physical hosts.
>
> On my LDOM machine a guest is setup and the initial net
Scott Adair wrote:
> Yes, all of these vnets are on the same subnet.
>
within a guest are all 3 vnets in the same subnet? from your previous
emails I thought all 3 vnets are plumbed and in use, in each guest; but
looks like you are saying only 1 is plumbed?
> The issue occurs from just general
Scott Adair wrote:
> So we have some mixed results. This seems to have reduced the issue, but it
> has not solved it. Actually, I think it has masked it a bit since it seems to
> have just increased a timeout in the vsw code (although I'm not a programmer,
> so I don't know for sure).
>
That
Octave Orgeron wrote:
>I'm curious about how issues around IPMP and Link Aggregation might be
>addressed in S10 U5 and crossbow.
>
>I know there are some Link Aggregation enhancements in S10 U5 that'll help to
>some degree. Specifically, what I'm looking to address are issues with IPMP on
>LDom
Gustavo Beltrami Rossi wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I'm wondering if anyone could help me with an example on how to
>configure IPMP (link-based failure detection) in the Service Domain, and
>how to assign the virtual network to a Guest Domain.
>
>I'm reading the LDOM 1.0.1 Admin Guide, and did not unde
do you have the right device entries in /dev? run devfsadm just to be sure.
-Harsha
Nicole Thai wrote:
12 matches
Mail list logo
