The PPPd image is a EigerStein2Beta based image so in terms of the actual
firewall script itself ive changed nothing...
Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on your view point) the pppd setting
are setup for a constant connection, mostly this is due because in the
majority of the United States
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Greg Morgan wrote:
[...]
> I just came across some Redhat documentation. It's Appendix A in the
> "Red Hat Linux 7.1: The Official Red Hat Linux Reference Guide".
> There's a reference for almost everything. It starts here:
> http://www.redhat.com/support/manuals/RHL-7.1-
Kenneth Hadley how is your PPPd image coming along? The reason asking is
your update is 02-11-01 and is beta. I do have a partially working version
but the PPP interface is always up untill my ISP kills it then redial and
connects again. I did put sshd.lrp and that is working. I do have a
problem
Hello David, all,
At 21:52 25/06/01, David D. wrote:
>I recently got the vncviewer application put up into a package; I
So did I three years ago (SVNCV LRP package) and since then I am working
with it to access some Linux and Windows systems from LRP. I agree with
you... what more do you need
I'll be going offline sometime soon (not sure yet exactly when) as I move
into my new office. The SDSL connection at the new facility went online
today, so I'll be migrating my existing services, including dns, e-mail, and
web servers over to the new facility sometime tonight or tomorrow. Since
Does it also interface to kernel 2.4.x?
Thanks.
Bao
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pim van
> Riezen
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 11:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Leaf-devel] ANN: access-list, an ipchains replacement
Jeff, all of your comments check out with mine, except this one:
>In our case, the final product would probably be a generic 486, but I
>don't see support for that.
486 platforms are NOT supported.
We have to evolve a little :(
"This reads on manual page 46: This LSP was built for 586 processo
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
> >> > I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong
> with
> >> > CD1...
> >> >
> >> > It should boot, but I get nothing.
> >>
> >> Hmm...I just tried booting mine and I get a lilo prompt...
>
> >I have a 1.2 and 2.0(2disks), and
Everyone,
Most of SF is operating properly, but it still has the following problems:
SourceForge.net Web Site: One pending issue
Download Services: One pending issue
https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352&group_id=1
I'll continue to update everyone on the situation. Than
No. Don't bother Mike.
Really, as I continue to read the pdf, I reckon that we
should go in the cross-compiling direction.
Why boot and install a target if you haven't decide what
packages will ou put there?
I will investigate further on.
I have had little experience with a full-distro but Red
Luis.F.Correia, 2001-06-26 12:22 +0100
>Mike,
>
>If you read the manual, HHL-JE-20.PDF, Chapter3 on page 19,
>"Installing HHL 2.0 on an IA-32/x86 Target for a Source-
>base Installation"
>
>Right on the Overview chapter you can read:
>"The HHL 2.0 CDs for IA-32/x86 targets are bootable, and may be
Mike,
If you read the manual, HHL-JE-20.PDF, Chapter3 on page 19,
"Installing HHL 2.0 on an IA-32/x86 Target for a Source-
base Installation"
Right on the Overview chapter you can read:
"The HHL 2.0 CDs for IA-32/x86 targets are bootable, and may be booted
directly on a target whose BIOS provid
Luis.F.Correia, 2001-06-26 09:30 +0100
> >> > I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong
> >> > with CD1...
> >> >
> >> > It should boot, but I get nothing.
> >>
> >> Hmm...I just tried booting mine and I get a lilo prompt...
>
> >I have a 1.2 and 2.0(2disks), and the form
>> > I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong
with
>> > CD1...
>> >
>> > It should boot, but I get nothing.
>>
>> Hmm...I just tried booting mine and I get a lilo prompt...
>I have a 1.2 and 2.0(2disks), and the former will boot (target mode) while
>the latter will not
14 matches
Mail list logo
