Re: [Leaf-devel] Webbased Configuration

2002-08-31 Thread Eric Wolzak
Hello Lynn, Charles , List > On Saturday 31 August 2002 14:21, Eric Wolzak wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I agree with Erich that it would be wise to get an architecture > > before thinking about the implementation. > > IMHO it should be : > > -easy to configure. > > -flexible , so adding new packa

Re: [Leaf-devel] Webbased Configuration

2002-08-31 Thread guitarlynn
On Saturday 31 August 2002 14:21, Eric Wolzak wrote: > Hello all, > > I agree with Erich that it would be wise to get an architecture > before thinking about the implementation. > IMHO it should be : > -easy to configure. > -flexible , so adding new packages is possible without much > programming.

Re: [Leaf-devel] Webbased Configuration

2002-08-31 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> So I came up with the next Idea: > http://wolzak.de/leaf/config2.jpg I like this better. Another thing I'd like to see in all architecture discussions of a configuration system is alternate display front/back ends. I'd like to see a simple text menu type system that could extend and replace l

[Leaf-devel] Webbased Configuration

2002-08-31 Thread Eric Wolzak
Hello all, I agree with Erich that it would be wise to get an architecture before thinking about the implementation. IMHO it should be : -easy to configure. -flexible , so adding new packages is possible without much programming. -flexible 2- so it is possible to use the same system on oxygen,

Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: Webbased configuration

2002-08-31 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> Better sense tells me I should probably keep quiet, but ... Nah...speak up. We won't even flame you here! > Back when this discussion came up previously (Dec 2001/Jan 2002?) I > was able to get micro_httpd working with an embedded lua interpreter. > It allows one to write html code with inli