On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Tony wrote:
>
> The script is as follows:
>
You have to decide whether the binary is /usr/sbin/snort or
/usr/local/sbin/snort -- in your script, you seem to flip a coin each time
that you refer to the binary and write one path name or the other.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\ Shore
Good Evening,
I have been hacking around and have managed to compile the latest Snort
(v2.0.1) under the virtual Usermode Linux using the GlibC 2.0.7. All is
well and it runs much better than the v1.8 that's floating around.
I have one problem. I had to include the init.d script from v1.8 to ge
> > Yes, dutmp is still used in (all of?) the LEAF branches, some of the
> > POSIXness scripts rely on it.
>
> Ok, cool. Just figured I'd check now that Dave has made
> his dramatic exit stage left.
>
> -Erik
>
Erik,
I just looked in the POSIXness scripts, the parts were it's used in
are: "
On Thu Jul 31, 2003 at 10:18:41PM +0200, Eric Spakman wrote:
> >
> > > Question for you In busybox I have an LRP specific
> > > utility I added _years_ ago written by "Dave kill-a-cop
> > > Cinege" called 'dutmp'. Still used or can I kill it?
>
> Yes, dutmp is still used in (all of?) the L
>
> > Question for you In busybox I have an LRP specific
> > utility I added _years_ ago written by "Dave kill-a-cop
> > Cinege" called 'dutmp'. Still used or can I kill it?
> >
> > -Erik
> >
> > --
> > Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
> > --This message was w
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:20 PM
> To: Sean
> Subject: Re: LEAF
>
>
> On Wed Jul 30, 2003 at 01:07:56PM -0400, Sean wrote:
> > Yes. His "announcement" caused quite a stir on the LEAF
> lists. The
> > old-t
Hi everybody
could anyone please enlighten me, I am recompiling the Bering kernel and I
am getting these messages which make me wonder if by any chance in the
config from Jacques' site there creeps some UML stuff.
uml_netjig.c:73: pcap.h: No such file or directory
make[4]: *** [uml_netjig.o] Er
