I agree with Andrew's reasons for using LEAF. It has been my perimeter
firewall for many years. However, by far, my preferred network
architecture involves a perimeter firewall as a "standalone" box that
does only that "first line of defense" job. I put some value on being
able to Power-Cycle my
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 16:28 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 09:13 -0700, Paul Rogers wrote:
> >>> The 2.6 kernel is that large, that a runnable _and_ useful floppy
> >>> version in the way we provided it with the kernel 2.4- based versions
> >> I'm not sure I
Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 09:13 -0700, Paul Rogers wrote:
>>> The 2.6 kernel is that large, that a runnable _and_ useful floppy
>>> version in the way we provided it with the kernel 2.4- based versions
>> I'm not sure I understand why someone wants a 2.6 kernel to run a
>> standalon
Just a test folks, sorry for the noise
--
___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
> I'm not sure I understand why someone wants a 2.6 kernel to run a
> standalone LEAF/Bering firewall. Can't find an old box and needs
> the hardware support for a box that's entirely too powerful? ;-)
>
I use LEAF for more powerful tasks that home router/storage, and we have
more than 400M
