Am 11.06.2012 17:38, schrieb Andrew:
> Hi.
> This is bad idea, it can break all userland that was compiled for older
> uClibc - so mixing different versions of base libs/compilers/kernels
> isn't good idea for minor releases.
> You can include new package into 5.x branch (I think we'll have first
On 11 Jun 2012, at 17:49, Andrew wrote:
> Hi all.
> I noticed that there are some packages that are built with errors. Some
> of them I fixed (for ex., shorewall6 - it installs init file as
> shorewall, not shorewall6, and so on), and some of them have unresolved
> dependencies (includes), amo
Hi all.
I noticed that there are some packages that are built with errors. Some
of them I fixed (for ex., shorewall6 - it installs init file as
shorewall, not shorewall6, and so on), and some of them have unresolved
dependencies (includes), among them - samba and librpcsecgss.
Here are parts of
Hi.
This is bad idea, it can break all userland that was compiled for older
uClibc - so mixing different versions of base libs/compilers/kernels
isn't good idea for minor releases.
You can include new package into 5.x branch (I think we'll have first
alpha in June/July), or you can try to patch
Hi all,
i'm trying to build a new package: ndppd (http://www.priv.nu/projects/ndppd/)
but our uClibc (v 0.9.30.3) have one missing defined constant: ETHERTYPE_IPV6.
This constant is in the /usr/include/net/ethernet.h. For the moment i made a
patch to add this constant for ndppd, but i think it w
Am 05.06.2012 10:40, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
> Le 04/06/2012 20:04, KP Kirchdoerfer a écrit :
>> Hi Yves,
>>
>> Am 04.06.2012 19:33, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> i find a bug in the management of proxy NDP in shorewall 4.4.27.3 package.
>>> So do you think it's possible to merge the mo
