Charles,
Thanks for your input :) Comments and more questions inline;
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
What do I do with my blinder.lrp (it's getting closer to
releaseability)... licensing-wise?
Pretty much whatever you want :)
Heh... :)
The
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 01:18, Jon Clausen wrote:
Charles,
Thanks for your input :) Comments and more questions inline;
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
What do I do with my blinder.lrp (it's getting closer to
releaseability)... licensing-wise?
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 01:18, Jon Clausen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
NOTE: There *IS* a GPL notification at the start of sh-httpd, it was a
bit more work :)
And that is what it takes? So I basically 'just declare' my stuff to be
GPL'ed
At 08:42 AM 7/18/02 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
[...]
Considering that the whole thing consists of a number ~(10 - 12)
scripts/C-programs, do I need to put the 'notice' in each one? Or is it
sufficient to put it in, say, a README, packaged with the rest?
Jon,
I think it's acceptable to place
Hi all
All this talk about the different license schemes lately, has me
wondering...
What do I do with my blinder.lrp (it's getting closer to
releaseability)... licensing-wise?
The majority of the code is written by myself. But there *are* snippets of
code here and there (mainly the C-parts)
All this talk about the different license schemes lately, has me
wondering...
What do I do with my blinder.lrp (it's getting closer to
releaseability)... licensing-wise?
Pretty much whatever you want :)
The majority of the code is written by myself. But there *are*
snippets of
code here
Something is definitely not right... I guess I have to talk to my ISP :(
Anyway, I tried sending this yesterday, and since it hasn't shown up
yet, I'll try once more:
- Forwarded message from Jon Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:36:09 +0200
From: Jon Clausen [EMAIL
