KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> On Monday 07 January 2008 00:12:56 Erich Titl wrote:
>> KP
>>
>> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
>>> On Saturday 05 January 2008 22:27:29 Erich Titl wrote:
KP
>> ...
>>
>>> I'm pretty shure we never enabled busybox ip and used iproute instead.
>> OK
>>
What do you get
Hi Erich,
Do you still have "CONFIG_FEATURE_IFUPDOWN_IP_BUILTIN=y" enabled in
busybox? This shouldn't be because we are using the full version of the
iptools.
Eric
> KP
>
>
> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
>
>> On Saturday 05 January 2008 22:27:29 Erich Titl wrote:
>>
>>> KP
>>>
> ...
>
>>
>> I'm p
On Monday 07 January 2008 00:12:56 Erich Titl wrote:
> KP
>
> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> > On Saturday 05 January 2008 22:27:29 Erich Titl wrote:
> >> KP
>
> ...
>
> > I'm pretty shure we never enabled busybox ip and used iproute instead.
>
> OK
>
> >> What do you get with
> >>
> >> ls -l `which ip
KP
KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> On Saturday 05 January 2008 22:27:29 Erich Titl wrote:
>> KP
...
>
> I'm pretty shure we never enabled busybox ip and used iproute instead.
OK
>
>> What do you get with
>>
>> ls -l `which ip`
>
> gatekeeper# ls -l `which ip`
> -rwxr-xr-x1 root root
On Saturday 05 January 2008 22:27:29 Erich Titl wrote:
> KP
>
> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> > On Saturday 05 January 2008 22:16:38 Erich Titl wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > I'm talking about the kernel module.
> >
> >> I have 1.8.2 built from cvs and rebuilt initrd. I have no ipv6 enabled.
> >> Still ntpd is
KP
KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> On Saturday 05 January 2008 22:16:38 Erich Titl wrote:
...
>
> I'm talking about the kernel module.
>
>> I have 1.8.2 built from cvs and rebuilt initrd. I have no ipv6 enabled.
>> Still ntpd is not functional.
>
> with ipv6 module loaded I see:
>
>> ntpq -c "rv 0
On Saturday 05 January 2008 22:16:38 Erich Titl wrote:
> KP
>
> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> > Hi;
> >
> > On Saturday 05 January 2008 15:13:41 Erich Titl wrote:
> >> Hi Folks
> >>
> >> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> >>> On Saturday 05 January 2008 00:54:50 Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> Hello again,
KP
KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> Hi;
>
> On Saturday 05 January 2008 15:13:41 Erich Titl wrote:
>> Hi Folks
>>
>> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
>>> On Saturday 05 January 2008 00:54:50 Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
Hello again, Erich and fellow Beringians
fre 2008-01-04 klockan 20:59 +0100 sk
Hi;
On Saturday 05 January 2008 15:13:41 Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi Folks
>
> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> > On Saturday 05 January 2008 00:54:50 Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> >> Hello again, Erich and fellow Beringians
> >>
> >> fre 2008-01-04 klockan 20:59 +0100 skrev Erich Titl:
> >>> Mats
>
> ..
>
>
Hi Folks
KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> On Saturday 05 January 2008 00:54:50 Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
>> Hello again, Erich and fellow Beringians
>>
>> fre 2008-01-04 klockan 20:59 +0100 skrev Erich Titl:
>>> Mats
>>>
..
>>
>
> Maybe it is a lot easier - I've overlooked a new feature in .config in
Well done KP - it looks like that's it!
My previous testing of 3.1-beta2 was with static addresses only, but
I've just built a test machine on my internal network and with stock
3.1-beta2 it won't grab a DHCP address at boot time.
Replacing /bin/busybox in the initrd with a version built from the
On Saturday 05 January 2008 00:54:50 Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> Hello again, Erich and fellow Beringians
>
> fre 2008-01-04 klockan 20:59 +0100 skrev Erich Titl:
> > Mats
> >
> > ..., looking at the changelog the first thing that catches my
> > eye is a new busybox release. Ifup/down are busybox
Hello again, Erich and fellow Beringians
fre 2008-01-04 klockan 20:59 +0100 skrev Erich Titl:
> Mats
> ..., looking at the changelog the first thing that catches my
> eye is a new busybox release. Ifup/down are busybox applets, so a new
> version might make a difference. Have you tried to step ba
Mats
Mats Erik Andersson schrieb:
> Hello KP and all hardware testers,
>
> I finally directed this to the devel-list,
> in order to minimize the technical pollution
> at the users-list.
>
> Sadly to say my problems with dhcpcd persists
> when testing on two naked pc-wrecks with chipset
> Via 586
Hello KP and all hardware testers,
I finally directed this to the devel-list,
in order to minimize the technical pollution
at the users-list.
Sadly to say my problems with dhcpcd persists
when testing on two naked pc-wrecks with chipset
Via 586B. Neither "pci=assign-busses", nor "pci=bios"
are ab
15 matches
Mail list logo
