the successful /
> failed environments that may highlight the issue, or perhaps you could
> compare the logs from 32-bit and 64-bit Ubuntu 10.
>
> dMb
>
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: davidMbrooke [mailto:dmb.leaf-de...@ntlworld.com]
> > Sen
uld
not be found
Cheers
Adam
-Original Message-
From: davidMbrooke [mailto:dmb.leaf-de...@ntlworld.com]
Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 11:52 PM
To: ads...@genis-x.com
Cc: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [leaf-devel] Buildtool with cvs down etc
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 16:39
rsday, 3 February 2011 10:10 AM
> To: ads...@genis-x.com
> Cc: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [leaf-devel] Buildtool with cvs down etc
>
> On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 08:37 +1100, ads...@genis-x.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was under the impression the new bering didn&
...@ntlworld.com]
Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 10:10 AM
To: ads...@genis-x.com
Cc: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [leaf-devel] Buildtool with cvs down etc
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 08:37 +1100, ads...@genis-x.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was under the impression the new bering didn&#
ew is much more of an expert on the buildenv than I am, so he may
have some other suggestions.
Does anybody else have a successful build on 64-bit Ubuntu 10?
dMb
>
> -Original Message-
> From: davidMbrooke [mailto:dmb.leaf-de...@ntlworld.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 7
ginal Message-
From: davidMbrooke [mailto:dmb.leaf-de...@ntlworld.com]
Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2011 7:57 AM
To: leaf-devel
Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Buildtool with cvs down etc
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 20:13 +1100, ads...@genis-x.com wrote:
> I should have added,
> Base ma
t; Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2011 5:16 PM
> To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Buildtool with cvs down etc
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I git clone'd the lastest buildtool and hit a snag.
>
>
> downloading: .config from serv
: [leaf-devel] Buildtool with cvs down etc
Hey guys,
I git clone'd the lastest buildtool and hit a snag.
downloading: .config from server leaf4-sourceforge type gitweb [0.K.]
downloading: 50_all_gcc44_no_ssp_tls_uclibc.patch from server
leaf4-sourceforge type gitweb [0.K.]
downloading: u
Hey guys,
I git clone'd the lastest buildtool and hit a snag.
downloading: .config from server leaf4-sourceforge type gitweb [0.K.]
downloading: 50_all_gcc44_no_ssp_tls_uclibc.patch from server
leaf4-sourceforge type gitweb [0.K.]
downloading: uClibc-0.9.30.3.tar.bz2 from server uclibc.org type
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 10:49 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
-snip-
> I'm not sure this is a great idea (I'd prefer SF to get CVS back
> on-line),
Everyone,
SF Staff expects to have CVS working later this week. I'll keep checking
status of the attack recovery on irc.
http://sourceforge.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/1/2011 6:26 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Theoratically it should be possible to work with the tarball without access
> to
> cvs - but I doubt anyone has done this before.
If it helps, I have installed viewvc and made a backup of the SF CVS
arch
Am Dienstag, 1. Februar 2011, um 13:18:17 schrieb ads...@genis-x.com:
> Hey guys,
>
> I know your working on getting it all backup in GIT/SVN etc,
> but in the meantime I wanted to setup my buildenv to be able to play with
> pxe booting.
>
> Is it possible to setup buildtool with upacking the
> B
Hey guys,
I know your working on getting it all backup in GIT/SVN etc,
but in the meantime I wanted to setup my buildenv to be able to play with pxe
booting.
Is it possible to setup buildtool with upacking the
Bering-uClibc_4.0-beta2_src.tgz ?
The wiki docco mentions updating the sources.cfg b
13 matches
Mail list logo
