Everyone note,
https://gitlog.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/git-1-6-6/
Preparing yourselves for compatibility issues in 1.7.0
In git 1.7.0, which is planned to be the release after 1.6.6,
there will be a handful of behaviour changes that will break
backward compatibility.
Also, IR
On 02/13/2012 08:58 AM, Andrew wrote:
> 12.02.2012 23:56, Erich Titl пишет:
>> Do I have to remove the origin from the remotes then?
> Yes, since it isn't associated with any remote repository, and it's
> branches aren't associated with any of local branches.
Andrew,
Thanks for jumping in. What i
12.02.2012 23:56, Erich Titl пишет:
> on 12.02.2012 15:59, Mike Noyes wrote:
>> On 02/12/2012 05:10 AM, Erich Titl wrote:
>>> Am 11.02.2012 15:14, schrieb Mike Noyes:
>> -snip-
You should be able to continue without performing any task on your end.
If this is not the case, please let me k
On 02/13/2012 07:40 AM, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Everyone,
> The Git Reference is a great place to learn about Git.
>
> Git Reference
> http://gitref.org/
>
> Sourceforge Git documentation
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Git
>
> Git Documentation (Books,
Everyone,
The Git Reference is a great place to learn about Git.
Git Reference
http://gitref.org/
Sourceforge Git documentation
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Git
Git Documentation (Books, Tutorials, Reference, Videos, etc.)
http
On 02/12/2012 11:19 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
> Mike
>
> at 13.02.2012 02:07, Mike Noyes wrote:
>> On 02/12/2012 01:56 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
>>> on 12.02.2012 15:59, Mike Noyes wrote:
On 02/12/2012 05:10 AM, Erich Titl wrote:
> Am 11.02.2012 15:14, schrieb Mike Noyes:
-snip-
>> You sh
Mike
at 13.02.2012 02:07, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On 02/12/2012 01:56 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
>> on 12.02.2012 15:59, Mike Noyes wrote:
>>> On 02/12/2012 05:10 AM, Erich Titl wrote:
Am 11.02.2012 15:14, schrieb Mike Noyes:
>>> -snip-
> You should be able to continue without performing any task
On 02/12/2012 01:56 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
> on 12.02.2012 15:59, Mike Noyes wrote:
>> On 02/12/2012 05:10 AM, Erich Titl wrote:
>>> Am 11.02.2012 15:14, schrieb Mike Noyes:
>> -snip-
You should be able to continue without performing any task on your end.
If this is not the case, please le
on 12.02.2012 15:59, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On 02/12/2012 05:10 AM, Erich Titl wrote:
>> Am 11.02.2012 15:14, schrieb Mike Noyes:
> -snip-
>>> You should be able to continue without performing any task on your end.
>>> If this is not the case, please let me know. Thanks.
>>
>
> > I guess it mus
On 02/12/2012 05:10 AM, Erich Titl wrote:
> Am 11.02.2012 15:14, schrieb Mike Noyes:
-snip-
>> You should be able to continue without performing any task on your end.
>> If this is not the case, please let me know. Thanks.
>
> Does the git URL not change?
Erich,
No. Instead of one CVS repository w
Am 11.02.2012 15:14, schrieb Mike Noyes:
On 02/11/2012 03:44 AM, Erich Titl wrote:
on 11.02.2012 02:51, Mike Noyes wrote:
On 02/10/2012 04:29 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
Erich,
We have three git repositories in leaf: leaf, bering-uclibc, and packages.
Erich,
You participated in this git repository
On 02/11/2012 03:44 AM, Erich Titl wrote:
> on 11.02.2012 02:51, Mike Noyes wrote:
>> On 02/10/2012 04:29 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
Erich,
We have three git repositories in leaf: leaf, bering-uclibc, and packages.
>>
>> Erich,
>> You participated in this git repository structure change in the
on 11.02.2012 02:51, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On 02/10/2012 04:29 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
>>> Erich,
>>> We have three git repositories in leaf: leaf, bering-uclibc, and packages.
>
> Erich,
> You participated in this git repository structure change in the
> leaf-devel "git tree developments" thread las
Am 10.02.2012 17:08, schrieb Mike Noyes:
> Everyone,
> Does anyone object to me reintializing (--bare) our git 'leaf'
> repository? All of that content is in 'bering-uclibc' and 'packages'.
>
Mike;
I don't see any pb reinitilazing "leaf" - it was a mistake made in the
hurry moving from ( at tha
On 02/10/2012 04:29 PM, Erich Titl wrote:
>> Erich,
>> We have three git repositories in leaf: leaf, bering-uclibc, and packages.
Erich,
You participated in this git repository structure change in the
leaf-devel "git tree developments" thread last year. I'm just proposing
the 'leaf' repository b
Hi Mike
on 10.02.2012 21:51, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On 02/10/2012 11:44 AM, Erich Titl wrote:
>> Hi Mike
>>
..
>
> Erich,
> We have three git repositories in leaf: leaf, bering-uclibc, and packages.
IIRC leaf _IS_ BuC 4.x
Erich
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift
---
On 02/10/2012 11:44 AM, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi Mike
>
> on 10.02.2012 17:08, Mike Noyes wrote:
>> Everyone,
>> Does anyone object to me reintializing (--bare) our git 'leaf'
>> repository? All of that content is in 'bering-uclibc' and 'packages'.
>>
>
> actually I believe the leaf directory is the
Hi Mike
on 10.02.2012 17:08, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Everyone,
> Does anyone object to me reintializing (--bare) our git 'leaf'
> repository? All of that content is in 'bering-uclibc' and 'packages'.
>
actually I believe the leaf directory is the base git directory. If you
reinitialize I have no cl
Everyone,
Does anyone object to me reintializing (--bare) our git 'leaf'
repository? All of that content is in 'bering-uclibc' and 'packages'.
--
Mike Noyes
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes
https://profiles.google.com/mhnoyes
19 matches
Mail list logo
