Hi Gents;
I've created a new branch maint-5.2, containing previous maint (5.2.x ) with
the purpose to commit fixes to 5.2.x if necessary, and merged master into maint
(now 6.0.x).
maint should be for fixes and changes for the 6.0.x series.
master is open for development >= 6.1.x
Andrew now is
Am 30.07.2013 19:53, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
Le 28 juil. 2013 à 19:28, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
Yes, sounds easier and more towards how we do releases.
I'm keen to tag versions when doing a new release, so that won't be a
problem.
A question, possibly
Le 28 juil. 2013 à 19:28, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
Yes, sounds easier and more towards how we do releases.
I'm keen to tag versions when doing a new release, so that won't be a
problem.
A question, possibly asked before, how do we keep branches like next in
Hi Yves
on 26.07.2013 19:30, Yves Blusseau wrote:
Le 24 juil. 2013 à 19:22, Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch a écrit :
Hi KP
...
But why changing stuff in 4.x if we never release it again.
It's time to upgrade to version 5.x.
Because it takes time :-)
cheers
Erich
smime.p7s
Le 27 juil. 2013 à 20:08, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
Am 27.07.2013 19:31, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
Le 27 juil. 2013 à 11:11, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
Well, seems a problem is that we have developed two different concepts
and
Am 28.07.2013 10:47, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
Le 27 juil. 2013 à 20:08, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
Am 27.07.2013 19:31, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
Le 27 juil. 2013 à 11:11, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
Well, seems a problem is that we
Le 27 juil. 2013 à 00:44, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
My understanding is that we also don't release 5.0.0.x, or something
else - 5.0.1 is the maintenance version for 5.0. The changes are mostly
package updates but no big changes.
NO, maint is for old version
Hi Yves;
Am 27.07.2013 10:54, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
Le 27 juil. 2013 à 00:44, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
My understanding is that we also don't release 5.0.0.x, or something
else - 5.0.1 is the maintenance version for 5.0. The changes are mostly
package
Le 24 juil. 2013 à 19:22, Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch a écrit :
Hi KP
on 24.07.2013 19:11, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi all;
hi Yves;
now that 5.0 has gone stable and even a first beta of 5.0.1 is out, I
think it's about time to move master branch to maint.
What would be the old
Hi Yves;
Am 26.07.2013 19:30, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
Le 24 juil. 2013 à 19:22, Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch a écrit :
Hi KP
on 24.07.2013 19:11, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi all;
hi Yves;
now that 5.0 has gone stable and even a first beta of 5.0.1 is out, I
think it's about time to
Hi all;
hi Yves;
now that 5.0 has gone stable and even a first beta of 5.0.1 is out, I
think it's about time to move master branch to maint.
If Andrew agrees, and does have some spare time to work on it, the first
addition to the new master could be his work in andrew/linux-headers -
I'd like
Hi KP
on 24.07.2013 19:11, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Hi all;
hi Yves;
now that 5.0 has gone stable and even a first beta of 5.0.1 is out, I
think it's about time to move master branch to maint.
What would be the old content of maint then and how would one access it?
Should we branch off a 4.x
Hi;
Am 02.04.2013 09:05, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
$git cherry -v master origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain
+ c99432cb0297ef5c4d84aa3ece351414d29a2d49 Add x86_64-net6501-linux-uclibc
toolchain
Are we okay to merge it ?
If it works..., I can't test.
Does it mean we need to create another
$git cherry -v master origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain
+ c99432cb0297ef5c4d84aa3ece351414d29a2d49 Add x86_64-net6501-linux-uclibc
toolchain
Are we okay to merge it ?
If it works..., I can't test.
Does it mean we need to create another image?
Yes it works, i have a net501 board.
The
Le 31 mars 2013 à 23:06, Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch a écrit :
Am 31.03.2013 20:41, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
Hi all;
I just looked into the branches we have:
git branch -r
origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain
origin/maint
origin/maint-4.0
origin/maint-4.2
origin/master
Am 01.04.2013 10:37, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
Le 31 mars 2013 à 23:06, Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch a écrit :
Am 31.03.2013 20:41, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
Hi all;
I just looked into the branches we have:
git branch -r
origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain
origin/maint
Hi all;
I just looked into the branches we have:
git branch -r
origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain
origin/maint
origin/maint-4.0
origin/maint-4.2
origin/master
origin/next
origin/pu
origin/rpi
origin/ybl/modules-OO
Can we delete/remove
origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain
origin/maint-4.0
Am 31.03.2013 20:41, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
Hi all;
I just looked into the branches we have:
git branch -r
origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain
origin/maint
origin/maint-4.0
origin/maint-4.2
origin/master
origin/next
origin/pu
origin/rpi
origin/ybl/modules-OO
18 matches
Mail list logo