[leaf-devel] git branches refreshed

2016-10-22 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Hi Gents; I've created a new branch maint-5.2, containing previous maint (5.2.x ) with the purpose to commit fixes to 5.2.x if necessary, and merged master into maint (now 6.0.x). maint should be for fixes and changes for the 6.0.x series. master is open for development >= 6.1.x Andrew now is

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-07-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 30.07.2013 19:53, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 28 juil. 2013 à 19:28, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : Yes, sounds easier and more towards how we do releases. I'm keen to tag versions when doing a new release, so that won't be a problem. A question, possibly

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-07-30 Thread Yves Blusseau
Le 28 juil. 2013 à 19:28, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : Yes, sounds easier and more towards how we do releases. I'm keen to tag versions when doing a new release, so that won't be a problem. A question, possibly asked before, how do we keep branches like next in

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-07-29 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Yves on 26.07.2013 19:30, Yves Blusseau wrote: Le 24 juil. 2013 à 19:22, Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch a écrit : Hi KP ... But why changing stuff in 4.x if we never release it again. It's time to upgrade to version 5.x. Because it takes time :-) cheers Erich smime.p7s

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-07-28 Thread Yves Blusseau
Le 27 juil. 2013 à 20:08, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : Am 27.07.2013 19:31, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 27 juil. 2013 à 11:11, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : Well, seems a problem is that we have developed two different concepts and

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-07-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 28.07.2013 10:47, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 27 juil. 2013 à 20:08, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : Am 27.07.2013 19:31, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 27 juil. 2013 à 11:11, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : Well, seems a problem is that we

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-07-27 Thread Yves Blusseau
Le 27 juil. 2013 à 00:44, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : My understanding is that we also don't release 5.0.0.x, or something else - 5.0.1 is the maintenance version for 5.0. The changes are mostly package updates but no big changes. NO, maint is for old version

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-07-27 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Yves; Am 27.07.2013 10:54, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 27 juil. 2013 à 00:44, KP Kirchdoerfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : My understanding is that we also don't release 5.0.0.x, or something else - 5.0.1 is the maintenance version for 5.0. The changes are mostly package

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-07-26 Thread Yves Blusseau
Le 24 juil. 2013 à 19:22, Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch a écrit : Hi KP on 24.07.2013 19:11, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi all; hi Yves; now that 5.0 has gone stable and even a first beta of 5.0.1 is out, I think it's about time to move master branch to maint. What would be the old

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-07-26 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Yves; Am 26.07.2013 19:30, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 24 juil. 2013 à 19:22, Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch a écrit : Hi KP on 24.07.2013 19:11, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi all; hi Yves; now that 5.0 has gone stable and even a first beta of 5.0.1 is out, I think it's about time to

[leaf-devel] git branches

2013-07-24 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi all; hi Yves; now that 5.0 has gone stable and even a first beta of 5.0.1 is out, I think it's about time to move master branch to maint. If Andrew agrees, and does have some spare time to work on it, the first addition to the new master could be his work in andrew/linux-headers - I'd like

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-07-24 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP on 24.07.2013 19:11, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Hi all; hi Yves; now that 5.0 has gone stable and even a first beta of 5.0.1 is out, I think it's about time to move master branch to maint. What would be the old content of maint then and how would one access it? Should we branch off a 4.x

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-04-03 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; Am 02.04.2013 09:05, schrieb Yves Blusseau: $git cherry -v master origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain + c99432cb0297ef5c4d84aa3ece351414d29a2d49 Add x86_64-net6501-linux-uclibc toolchain Are we okay to merge it ? If it works..., I can't test. Does it mean we need to create another

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-04-02 Thread Yves Blusseau
$git cherry -v master origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain + c99432cb0297ef5c4d84aa3ece351414d29a2d49 Add x86_64-net6501-linux-uclibc toolchain Are we okay to merge it ? If it works..., I can't test. Does it mean we need to create another image? Yes it works, i have a net501 board. The

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-04-01 Thread Yves Blusseau
Le 31 mars 2013 à 23:06, Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch a écrit : Am 31.03.2013 20:41, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: Hi all; I just looked into the branches we have: git branch -r origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain origin/maint origin/maint-4.0 origin/maint-4.2 origin/master

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-04-01 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 01.04.2013 10:37, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 31 mars 2013 à 23:06, Erich Titl erich.t...@think.ch a écrit : Am 31.03.2013 20:41, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: Hi all; I just looked into the branches we have: git branch -r origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain origin/maint

[leaf-devel] git branches

2013-03-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi all; I just looked into the branches we have: git branch -r origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain origin/maint origin/maint-4.0 origin/maint-4.2 origin/master origin/next origin/pu origin/rpi origin/ybl/modules-OO Can we delete/remove origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain origin/maint-4.0

Re: [leaf-devel] git branches

2013-03-31 Thread Erich Titl
Am 31.03.2013 20:41, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: Hi all; I just looked into the branches we have: git branch -r origin/buc5-x86_64-toolchain origin/maint origin/maint-4.0 origin/maint-4.2 origin/master origin/next origin/pu origin/rpi origin/ybl/modules-OO