24.06.2011 13:58, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Andrew
>
> at 24.06.2011 11:56, Andrew wrote:
>> 24.06.2011 09:17, Erich Titl пишет:
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> at 23.06.2011 16:02, Andrew wrote:
23.06.2011 16:18, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Andrew
>
>>> ...
>>>
> ...
>
>> It seems like you already have ad
Hi Andrew
at 24.06.2011 11:56, Andrew wrote:
> 24.06.2011 09:17, Erich Titl пишет:
>> Andrew
>>
>> at 23.06.2011 16:02, Andrew wrote:
>>> 23.06.2011 16:18, Erich Titl пишет:
Hi Andrew
>> ...
>>
...
>>
> It seems like you already have added BuC repo, and now your local
> master is sync
24.06.2011 09:17, Erich Titl пишет:
> Andrew
>
> at 23.06.2011 16:02, Andrew wrote:
>> 23.06.2011 16:18, Erich Titl пишет:
>>> Hi Andrew
>>>
> ...
>
On what branch you are now (do 'git branch')?
>>> mega@luna:~/leaf/devel/leaf> git branch
>>> experimental
>>> * master
>>> mega@luna:~/lea
Andrew
at 23.06.2011 16:02, Andrew wrote:
> 23.06.2011 16:18, Erich Titl пишет:
>> Hi Andrew
>>
...
>>> On what branch you are now (do 'git branch')?
>> mega@luna:~/leaf/devel/leaf> git branch
>>experimental
>> * master
>> mega@luna:~/leaf/devel/leaf> ls
>> bering-uclibc4 buildlwp.sh
23.06.2011 16:18, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Andrew
>
> at 23.06.2011 13:30, Andrew wrote:
>> 23.06.2011 10:07, Erich Titl пишет:
>>> Hi Andrew
>>>
>>> at 23.06.2011 00:56, Andrew wrote:
23.06.2011 00:19, Erich Titl пишет:
>>>
>>>
It seems that you have at least one unpushed commit.
Hi Andrew
at 23.06.2011 13:30, Andrew wrote:
> 23.06.2011 10:07, Erich Titl пишет:
>> Hi Andrew
>>
>> at 23.06.2011 00:56, Andrew wrote:
>>> 23.06.2011 00:19, Erich Titl пишет:
>>
>>
>>> It seems that you have at least one unpushed commit.
>>> Easiest and most predictable way to resolve this
23.06.2011 10:07, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Andrew
>
> at 23.06.2011 00:56, Andrew wrote:
>> 23.06.2011 00:19, Erich Titl пишет:
>
>
>> It seems that you have at least one unpushed commit.
>> Easiest and most predictable way to resolve this IMHO todo next steps:
>> 1) Mark this commit as new bran
23.06.2011 09:33, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Andrew
>
> at 23.06.2011 00:56, Andrew wrote:
>> 23.06.2011 00:19, Erich Titl пишет:
>>> on 22.06.2011 22:03, Andrew wrote:
22.06.2011 22:15, Erich Titl пишет:
> HI Andrew
>
>>> ...
> git pull
> et...@leaf.git.sourceforge.net's password:
Hi Andrew
at 23.06.2011 00:56, Andrew wrote:
> 23.06.2011 00:19, Erich Titl пишет:
>>
> It seems that you have at least one unpushed commit.
> Easiest and most predictable way to resolve this IMHO todo next steps:
> 1) Mark this commit as new branch (git branch experimental)
> 2) Rollback to
Hi Andrew
at 23.06.2011 00:56, Andrew wrote:
> 23.06.2011 00:19, Erich Titl пишет:
>> on 22.06.2011 22:03, Andrew wrote:
>>> 22.06.2011 22:15, Erich Titl пишет:
HI Andrew
>> ...
git pull
et...@leaf.git.sourceforge.net's password:
error: Entry 'buildtool/COPYING' not uptoda
23.06.2011 00:19, Erich Titl пишет:
> on 22.06.2011 22:03, Andrew wrote:
>> 22.06.2011 22:15, Erich Titl пишет:
>>> HI Andrew
>>>
> ...
>>> git pull
>>> et...@leaf.git.sourceforge.net's password:
>>> error: Entry 'buildtool/COPYING' not uptodate. Cannot merge.
>>> fatal: merging of trees e706444b78
on 22.06.2011 22:03, Andrew wrote:
> 22.06.2011 22:15, Erich Titl пишет:
>> HI Andrew
>>
...
>>
>> git pull
>> et...@leaf.git.sourceforge.net's password:
>> error: Entry 'buildtool/COPYING' not uptodate. Cannot merge.
>> fatal: merging of trees e706444b7869ff20f2b976ed830388f288581773 and
>> 5ee7f8
22.06.2011 22:15, Erich Titl пишет:
> HI Andrew
>
> on 21.06.2011 23:38, Andrew wrote:
>> 22.06.2011 00:16, Erich Titl пишет:
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> on 21.06.2011 21:25, Andrew wrote:
21.06.2011 21:43, Andrew пишет:
> 21.06.2011 21:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>> Ok; created the repository l
HI Andrew
on 21.06.2011 23:38, Andrew wrote:
> 22.06.2011 00:16, Erich Titl пишет:
>> Andrew
>>
>> on 21.06.2011 21:25, Andrew wrote:
>>> 21.06.2011 21:43, Andrew пишет:
21.06.2011 21:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Ok; created the repository leaf/bering-uclibc.
> git clone ssh://u...@le
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2011, 22:05:56 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 22:25 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> > 21.06.2011 21:43, Andrew пишет:
> > > 21.06.2011 21:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > >> Ok; created the repository leaf/bering-uclibc.
> > >> git clone
> > >> ssh://u...@leaf.git.sourcefo
Hi Andrew
at 21.06.2011 23:38, Andrew wrote:
> 22.06.2011 00:16, Erich Titl пишет:
...
I'll try to do it now. It shouldn't be too hard :)
>>> Done. To move on new repository with minimal wasting of time, just do
>>> next commands:
>> You don't want to be in the directory of your old git
22.06.2011 00:16, Erich Titl пишет:
> Andrew
>
> on 21.06.2011 21:25, Andrew wrote:
>> 21.06.2011 21:43, Andrew пишет:
>>> 21.06.2011 21:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
Ok; created the repository leaf/bering-uclibc.
git clone ssh://u...@leaf.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/leaf/bering-uclibc
Andrew
on 21.06.2011 21:25, Andrew wrote:
> 21.06.2011 21:43, Andrew пишет:
>> 21.06.2011 21:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>>> Ok; created the repository leaf/bering-uclibc.
>>> git clone ssh://u...@leaf.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/leaf/bering-uclibc
>>>
>>> It's currently empty. Maybe someone will g
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 22:25 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 21.06.2011 21:43, Andrew пишет:
> > 21.06.2011 21:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> >> Ok; created the repository leaf/bering-uclibc.
> >> git clone ssh://u...@leaf.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/leaf/bering-uclibc
> >>
> >> It's currently empty. Maybe som
21.06.2011 21:43, Andrew пишет:
> 21.06.2011 21:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>> Ok; created the repository leaf/bering-uclibc.
>> git clone ssh://u...@leaf.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/leaf/bering-uclibc
>>
>> It's currently empty. Maybe someone will git knowledge will move the content
>> of leaf/leaf
21.06.2011 21:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Am Montag, 20. Juni 2011, 22:25:28 schrieb Erich Titl:
>> on 20.06.2011 21:22, Andrew wrote:
>>> 20.06.2011 18:53, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>> ...
>>
>>> I think that directories inside repos are actually unneeded. Branches
>>> are IMHO enough good. And swit
Am Montag, 20. Juni 2011, 22:25:28 schrieb Erich Titl:
> on 20.06.2011 21:22, Andrew wrote:
> > 20.06.2011 18:53, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> ...
>
> > I think that directories inside repos are actually unneeded. Branches
> > are IMHO enough good. And switching between them is easy (git checkout
> >
on 20.06.2011 21:22, Andrew wrote:
> 20.06.2011 18:53, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
...
>>
> I think that directories inside repos are actually unneeded. Branches
> are IMHO enough good. And switching between them is easy (git checkout
> branchname).
Yep
> Additional directories should add just heada
Am Montag, 20. Juni 2011, 21:22:06 schrieb Andrew:
> 20.06.2011 18:53, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Ok; Mikes proposal sounds reasoanble and I think a repository each leaf
> > project is a way to go.
> > In the repository we can one or more directories := different major
> > versions of a project. In
20.06.2011 18:53, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>
> Ok; Mikes proposal sounds reasoanble and I think a repository each leaf
> project is a way to go.
> In the repository we can one or more directories := different major versions
> of
> a project. In the past Bering-uClibc major version changed mostly whe
Am Montag, 20. Juni 2011, 01:38:59 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 00:23 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
> > Hi KP
> >
> > on 19.06.2011 20:48, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > - the current leaf/leaf repository consists now only of the
> > > "buildtool", the environme
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 00:23 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi KP
>
> on 19.06.2011 20:48, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> ...
> >
> > - the current leaf/leaf repository consists now only of the "buildtool",
> > the
> > environment (buildtool, sources and build helpers) for Bering-uClibc4.
> >
> > Andre
Hi KP
on 19.06.2011 20:48, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
...
>
> - the current leaf/leaf repository consists now only of the "buildtool", the
>
> environment (buildtool, sources and build helpers) for Bering-uClibc4.
>
> Andrews proposal is to (once again and hopefully finally) move all the
> curr
19.06.2011 22:49, Mike Noyes пишет:
> On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 21:36 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 21:18:23 schrieb Mike Noyes:
>>> On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 22:06 +0300, Andrew wrote:
19.06.2011 21:48, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Andrews proposal is to (once again and
On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 21:36 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 21:18:23 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> > On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 22:06 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> > > 19.06.2011 21:48, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > > > Andrews proposal is to (once again and hopefully finally) move all the
> >
On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 22:06 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 19.06.2011 21:48, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Andrews proposal is to (once again and hopefully finally) move all the
> > current
> > "buildtool" content to a more speaking name: bering-uclibc4 directory.
> > That way we may add more directories for
On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 20:48 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> as a summarize of the discussio of the last days:
>
> - the binaries has been moved to a new repository as a compromise between
> popular demand and the needs of the release dude - so they are not any longer
> in the way of
19.06.2011 21:48, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Andrews proposal is to (once again and hopefully finally) move all the current
> "buildtool" content to a more speaking name: bering-uclibc4 directory.
> That way we may add more directories for development under leaf/leaf, like
> bering-uclibc5, bering-uc
Hi all;
as a summarize of the discussio of the last days:
- the binaries has been moved to a new repository as a compromise between
popular demand and the needs of the release dude - so they are not any longer
in the way of a nice build environment.
They are in leaf/packages repository (namely
34 matches
Mail list logo
