Hi Paul,
>
> Speaking of busybox, I noticed that you're linking busybox to its linked
> commands with symbolic links instead of hardlinks. Using hardlinks should
> be more memory and space efficient *if* using a symbolic link takes up an
> inode in the filesystem in memory/on disk. Unfortunately,
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 06:18:01PM +0200, Eric Spakman wrote:
> I'd be interested to know how much adding traceroute to busybox does
> with the size of the initrds.
With traceroute:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 272952 2006-09-08 00:52 busybox
Without:
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 266136 Sep 4 2006 /bi
Hi Paul,
I don't want to enable traceroute in busybox, because it don't work
out of the box with shorewall and it adds size. Traceroute can also
be done from any host connected.
I rather have a separate traceroute package.
Eric
>? busybox-1.2.1
>Index: .config
>
? busybox-1.2.1
Index: .config
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/leaf/src/bering-uclibc/apps/busybox/.config,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.10 .config
--- .config 13 Aug 2006 20:22:05 - 1.10
+++ .config 8 Sep 2006 05:08:0
