Hi Eric
changing thread as the original issue is gone.
Eric Spakman wrote:
> Hi Erich,
>
> Do you still have "CONFIG_FEATURE_IFUPDOWN_IP_BUILTIN=y" enabled in
> busybox? This shouldn't be because we are using the full version of the
> iptools.
I removed it again as it serves no purpose for us.
Hi Erich,
Strange, neither the version of ntpd or iptools has changed between the
two betas and the initrd basicly only contains busybox. So I wonder what
can cause this problem... besides an ntpd init script (busybox change in
init applet?) or a busybox command used in the ntp scripts..
Eric
>>
Hi Eric
Eric Spakman wrote:
> Hi Erich,
>
> Strange, neither the version of ntpd or iptools has changed between the
> two betas and the initrd basicly only contains busybox.
Yes, strange indeed, I just looked at .config again to double check the
settings.
So I wonder what
> can cause this pro
Hi Erich,
Because it works for KP, did you make any change to the ntpd package or
did you compile your own?
Eric
>>
>>
>> Strange, neither the version of ntpd or iptools has changed between the
>> two betas and the initrd basicly only contains busybox.
>
> Yes, strange indeed, I just looked at
Hi Eric
Eric Spakman wrote:
> Hi Erich,
>
> Because it works for KP, did you make any change to the ntpd package or
> did you compile your own?
To start with, no. I am using the one that works fine with 3.1beta1. I
just compiled it today to have a debug image, but the output is
insufficient to
On Monday 07 January 2008 14:42:56 Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi Eric
>
> Eric Spakman wrote:
> > Hi Erich,
> >
> > Because it works for KP, did you make any change to the ntpd package or
> > did you compile your own?
>
> To start with, no. I am using the one that works fine with 3.1beta1. I
> just compil
KP
KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> On Monday 07 January 2008 14:42:56 Erich Titl wrote:
>> Hi Eric
>>
>> Eric Spakman wrote:
>>> Hi Erich,
>>>
>>> Because it works for KP, did you make any change to the ntpd package or
>>> did you compile your own?
>> To start with, no. I am using the one that works fi
On Monday 07 January 2008 22:27:04 Erich Titl wrote:
> KP
>
> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> > On Monday 07 January 2008 14:42:56 Erich Titl wrote:
> >> Hi Eric
> >>
> >> Eric Spakman wrote:
> >>> Hi Erich,
> >>>
> >>> Because it works for KP, did you make any change to the ntpd package or
> >>> did yo
Erich;
On Monday 07 January 2008 22:27:04 Erich Titl wrote:
> KP
>
> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> > On Monday 07 January 2008 14:42:56 Erich Titl wrote:
> >> Hi Eric
> >>
> >> Eric Spakman wrote:
> >>> Hi Erich,
> >>>
> >>> Because it works for KP, did you make any change to the ntpd package or
> >>
KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Erich;
>
> On Monday 07 January 2008 22:27:04 Erich Titl wrote:
>> KP
>>
>> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
>>> On Monday 07 January 2008 14:42:56 Erich Titl wrote:
Hi Eric
Eric Spakman wrote:
> Hi Erich,
>
> Because it works for KP, did you make any
KP
KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> Erich;
>
...
>
> I installedd initrd from beta1 (busybox 1.5.0svn) and see the same error:
> ntpd
> does not start with ipv6 enabled.
>
> running ntpd with -ddd shows:
> addto_syslog: Listening on interface #0 wildcard, 0.0.0.0#123 Disabled
> addto_syslog: bind(
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 19:18:54 Erich Titl wrote:
> KP
>
> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> > Erich;
>
> ...
>
> > I installedd initrd from beta1 (busybox 1.5.0svn) and see the same error:
> > ntpd does not start with ipv6 enabled.
> >
> > running ntpd with -ddd shows:
> > addto_syslog: Listening on
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 21:59:01 Erich Titl wrote:
> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> > On Tuesday 08 January 2008 19:18:54 Erich Titl wrote:
> >> KP
> >>
> >> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> >>> Erich;
> >>
> >> ...
>
> ...
>
> >> OK, Busybox is a different release, 1.8.2
> >>
> >> Well, we will see with
KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008 19:18:54 Erich Titl wrote:
>> KP
>>
>> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
>>> Erich;
>> ...
...
>>
>> OK, Busybox is a different release, 1.8.2
>>
>> Well, we will see with beta3, I still don't feel too well about these
>> differences.
>>
>
> Erich;
>
>
KP
KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008 21:59:01 Erich Titl wrote:
>> KP Kirchdoerfer schrieb:
...
>
> The gcc level, at least, is identical...
I found the culprit it is libuClibc-0.9.28.so
Really annoying problem. Now is there a clean way to replace it cleanly
without st
15 matches
Mail list logo
