On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 13:16, Richard Doyle wrote:
> Personally, I don't care whether sources are provided directly or
> upstream as long as they are publicly accessible. Unfortunately, this is
> not always the case for LEAF releases, which can include binaries
> compiled from modified sources, whe
On Sunday 14 July 2002 14:20, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 11:43, John Klar wrote:
> > Just some observations about my interpretation of the GPL. Perhaps
> > they won't be terribly popular, but hopefully it'll make a few
> > people *think*.
> >
> > [2] Pointing requestors to the upst
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 12:20, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 11:43, John Klar wrote:
> > Just some observations about my interpretation of the GPL. Perhaps they
> > won't be terribly popular, but hopefully it'll make a few people *think*.
> >
> > [2] Pointing requestors to the upstream
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 11:43, John Klar wrote:
> Just some observations about my interpretation of the GPL. Perhaps they
> won't be terribly popular, but hopefully it'll make a few people *think*.
>
> [2] Pointing requestors to the upstream source is NOT good enough. The
> distributor is require
Just some observations about my interpretation of the GPL. Perhaps they
won't be terribly popular, but hopefully it'll make a few people *think*.
IANAL, I am a software engineer. I am also not an OSS zealot. My
philosophy tends more towards Cluetrain than anything else.
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, g
On Friday 12 July 2002 12:31, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 15:45, guitarlynn wrote:
> Lynn,
> Thanks for the feedback. :-)
> I was hoping these proposals would generate more discussion than they
> have. I'd really appreciate additional feedback from our project
> members. I don't wan
I definitely have opinions on all of this but have been waiting to see the response
from others as I am the most junior involved.
From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 7/12/2002 10:31 AM
>I'm not proposing certification by our project of co
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 15:45, guitarlynn wrote:
> On Monday 08 July 2002 08:55, Mike Noyes wrote:
> > Corporate Affiliates proposal:
> > I'd like us to start affiliating with corporations. However, I'm
> > unsure of the point where we should consider a company for
> > affiliation. Do th
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 00:27, kitakura wrote:
> Don't worry. I am following GPL .
Thank-you :-)
I'm looking forward to seeing IPNuts succeed,
and I appreciate your time and effort with my concerns.
--
~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn
guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.n
> > # I'm developing kernel 2.4. It is going to use the linuxrc code of
> > Bering. # I am thankful to many developers.
>
> This is where I was really concerned. Are you using Bering and/or
> Dachstein IDE code for "sale-only" products that do not have open
> code equivilents (ie... floppy-only
First of all, I would like to thank-you, kitakura, for updating us
on your project and clarifying any assumptions that I made based
on what little information I interpreted from various websites. TY :-)
I offer my apologies for any false information/assumptions that I may
have made!
On Monday 0
>
> > But when webadmin is upgraded, a license may change.
>
> I'm sorry to hear this, but those that write the code usually get to
> choose the license.
Don't worry. It is a far future.
>
> > # I'm developing kernel 2.4. It is going to use the linuxrc
> code of Bering.
>
> Great. Is ther
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 17:26, kitakura wrote:
> > On Monday 08 July 2002 08:55, Mike Noyes wrote:
> > > Mosquito
> > > From what I was able to glean from babelfish
Kitakura,
It is nice to hear from you again. :-)
> Mosquito changed the name to IPnuts 3.4.
Then it was just a name change no
> On Monday 08 July 2002 08:55, Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> > Mosquito
> > From what I was able to glean from babelfish, it looks like
> > Mosquito was purchased by a VPN company (SeSame), renamed to IPnuts,
> > and was taken commercial. Does anyone have information on Mosquito
> > development statu
On Monday 08 July 2002 08:55, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Mosquito
> From what I was able to glean from babelfish, it looks like
> Mosquito was purchased by a VPN company (SeSame), renamed to IPnuts,
> and was taken commercial. Does anyone have information on Mosquito
> development status?
> http://b
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 06:55, Mike Noyes wrote:
> rc.firewall
> This site is unavailable, and there hasn't been a new release in a
> while. Does anyone know what the rcf development status is?
Everyone,
Steven just informed me this site is up and running again. I'm reviewing
the rcf-devel
16 matches
Mail list logo
