soapboxPersonally, I think there's something fundamentally wrong
with managing a firewall/router through a web-based interface, but it
seems that I'm the only one who feels this way.../soapbox
Nope, your not alone. _Many_ of us feel exactly that way, but may don't
and this limits the
On Tuesday 05 February 2002 08:16, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
IMHO, there's nothing inherently wrong with GUI config tools
(properly secured). I would like to see a consistent configuration
system for the next generation LEAF that allows text-based menu
configiguration via scripts on the
hehe, Linuxconf more like Webmin :)
OK, that pretty much eliminates any CGI except shell then. It's likely
the best option, being the perl is not possible on a floppy. I imagine
licensing would be a issue with vitually any other scripting language
anyway.
Not necessarily, although
Nothing nailed down so-far...the whole enchalida is up for grabs! I'd
especially like to see a clean, extensible, understandable method for
setting up complex networking configurations static routes, since we're
Something like a meta-defninition that goes in the package (currently
Nothing nailed down so-far...the whole enchalida is up for grabs! I'd
especially like to see a clean, extensible, understandable method for
setting up complex networking configurations static routes, since we're
Something like a meta-defninition that goes in the package (currently
On Tuesday 05 February 2002 14:52, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
sh-httpd could be modified to include POST, but it might be better to
use something like mini-httpd, or perhaps a web-server written in an
scripting alternate language (if we include something like java,
ruby, c). If we stick
On Monday 04 February 2002 08:21, Angelacos, Nathan wrote:
Lynn wrote regarding the Mosquito distribution:
I have been busy looking at some CGI options myself lately. :)
soapboxPersonally, I think there's something fundamentally wrong
with managing a firewall/router through a web-based
I would agree with everything there, but I feel that the standard CGI is
fine _on_ the distribution. SSL will be absolutely necessary for
anything run externally, which brings us back to the chicken-n-egg
question is sh-httpd configurable for SSL ?
If you've got the space, sh-httpd (or
