Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-31 Thread Andrew
31.10.2010 15:44, davidMbrooke пишет: > > Personally, I vote for keeping Modules and Packages separate - i.e. > Modules only in moddb.lrp and modules.tgz, never in package.lrp - and > loading the right Modules by other means. > Ok. So we just change current behavior of parsing 'module' type records

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-31 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 14:44:21 schrieb davidMbrooke: > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 14:29 +0200, Andrew wrote: > > P.S. Also there is a new question against package management: I included > > pptp kernel module into accel-pptp package (and made modifications to > > scripts - to avoid duplication o

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-31 Thread davidMbrooke
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 14:29 +0200, Andrew wrote: > > P.S. Also there is a new question against package management: I included > pptp kernel module into accel-pptp package (and made modifications to > scripts - to avoid duplication of modules in packages and moddb); also I > planned to do same t

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-31 Thread Andrew
31.10.2010 13:45, davidMbrooke пишет: > IMHO, if we plan to support multiple kernel variants "soon" (i.e. beta2 > or beta3) - and I do think that we should do that - then we should make > the changes to buildtool to enable that "now", i.e. for beta1. Even if > beta1 only ships with a single variant

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-31 Thread davidMbrooke
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 22:31 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 22:01:17 schrieb Andrew: > > 30.10.2010 22:44, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > > Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:56:41 schrieb Andrew: > > >> 30.10.2010 20:37, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > >>> Am Samstag, 30. Oktobe

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 22:01:17 schrieb Andrew: > 30.10.2010 22:44, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:56:41 schrieb Andrew: > >> 30.10.2010 20:37, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > >>> Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:19:03 schrieb Andrew: > 30.10.2010 19:45, KP Kirchdo

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-30 Thread Andrew
30.10.2010 22:44, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:56:41 schrieb Andrew: >> 30.10.2010 20:37, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >>> Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:19:03 schrieb Andrew: 30.10.2010 19:45, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > What about the kernel?? > kp IMHO we

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:56:41 schrieb Andrew: > 30.10.2010 20:37, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:19:03 schrieb Andrew: > >> 30.10.2010 19:45, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > >>> What about the kernel?? > >>> kp > >> > >> IMHO we need to provide different kernels; one

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-30 Thread Andrew
30.10.2010 20:37, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:19:03 schrieb Andrew: >> 30.10.2010 19:45, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >>> What about the kernel?? >>> kp >> IMHO we need to provide different kernels; one - for legacy i486 or >> Geode (or even separate kernels), and one - with

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 19:19:03 schrieb Andrew: > 30.10.2010 19:45, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > What about the kernel?? > > kp > > IMHO we need to provide different kernels; one - for legacy i486 or > Geode (or even separate kernels), and one - with SMP, more than 4GB > memory support (at le

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-30 Thread Andrew
30.10.2010 19:45, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > What about the kernel?? > kp > IMHO we need to provide different kernels; one - for legacy i486 or Geode (or even separate kernels), and one - with SMP, more than 4GB memory support (at least - for PAE enabling, for NX bit) for PentiumII or higher. ---

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 18:27:50 schrieb Andrew: > 30.10.2010 19:10, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > insmod aes_generic and all is well. > > It doesn't loaded by default with hardware autodetection script? Have to confess that I neglected harwdare autodetection until now, may have saved some he

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-30 Thread Andrew
30.10.2010 19:10, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > insmod aes_generic and all is well. It doesn't loaded by default with hardware autodetection script? > sorry for the noise > kp > BTW aiccu also runs daemonized, the main reason why I did the update... It's good that all is working OK. I finished test reb

Re: [leaf-devel] hostapd fails again...solved

2010-10-30 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am Samstag, 30. Oktober 2010, 17:56:47 schrieb Andrew: > 30.10.2010 18:34, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > Am Montag, 18. Oktober 2010, 20:17:09 schrieb Andrew: > >> Hi. > >> After rebuilding all with fresh kernel (2.6.35.7) I tried to test WiFi > >> and found that it doesn't work. Authentication pass O