Hi KP
at 13.02.2011 15:05, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Gents;
>
> as you may have noted we do have at least two packages which requires
> ifconfig
> in addition to iproute2.
>
> A short term solution would be to enable the ifconfig in busybox (adds 3kb to
> busybox), long-term solution to fix th
Hi Folks
It appears that the environment variables from buildtool.cfg are not
passed to the makefile for the buildclean and srcclean operations. Could
someone with insight in these modules please comment?
Thanks
Erich
I'm sure one of the web page maintainers will notice it soon, but just
in case, I'll mention it now: There's an XML parsing error on all the
leaf.sf.net (or leaf.sourceforce.net) pages as follows:
XML Parsing Error: mismatched tag. Expected: .
Location: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
Line Number 38
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:55 +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
> I'm sure one of the web page maintainers will notice it soon, but just
> in case, I'll mention it now: There's an XML parsing error on all the
> leaf.sf.net (or leaf.sourceforce.net) pages as follows:
Ian,
Thanks for letting me know. Firefox
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 09:33 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:55 +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
> > I'm sure one of the web page maintainers will notice it soon, but just
> > in case, I'll mention it now: There's an XML parsing error on all the
> > leaf.sf.net (or leaf.sourceforce.net)
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:40 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi Folks
>
> It appears that the environment variables from buildtool.cfg are not
> passed to the makefile for the buildclean and srcclean operations. Could
> someone with insight in these modules please comment?
>
> Thanks
>
> Erich
Hi Er
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 16:17 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 22:48 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 15. Mai 2011, um 22:02:45 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> > > On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 21:45 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > > > Am Sonntag, 15. Mai 2011, um 15:08:12 schrieb davidM
Hi kp,
> I'm not aware that any docbook content has been written with a special license
> in mind. Is it necessary to ask the original authors individually?
I don't know if it's required, but just to be sure: feel free to publish
any documentation I have written under any reasonable* license
(CC
Hi David
on 16.05.2011 21:33, davidMbrooke wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:40 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
>> Hi Folks
>>
>> It appears that the environment variables from buildtool.cfg are not
>> passed to the makefile for the buildclean and srcclean operations. Could
>> someone with insight in the
Hi Martin
on 16.05.2011 22:09, Martin Hejl wrote:
...
>
> * Reasonable to me means not placing any unneeded burden on the person
> wishing to use the documentation. As far as I'm concerned, anybody can
> use the docs I've written for anything they wish, as long as they don't
> use it for anyth
Hi Erich,
> If we stick with the buildtool code I would suggest to port the
> _makeEnvString ($$) method from buildtool::Make::Source to
> buildtool::Make::Common. I have not completely checked this though.
> Maybe Martin would know.
I wouldn't - for all I know, I didn't write the code (
http://
11 matches
Mail list logo
