On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Burt Adjoodani wrote:
> I am really interested in SMB uses with lrp and printing.
> Has anybody been able to make it work with NO hard drive?
...
> Enough rambling... I would like help on a hard drive less LRP Samba print server and
> LRP remote xterminals. Are both pro
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Hilton Travis wrote:
> What - are you troll? Why do you ask about flame wars if you are not
> after one? Huh??? People like you make me sick with your "I like the
> Spice Girls" attitude - they SUCK, plain and simple. No musical talent,
> no nothing!
>
> On another note, I
I am really interested in SMB uses with lrp and
printing.
Has anybody been able to make it work with
NO hard drive?
We have 2 LRP boxes here, 1 Linux Samba Server, 1
Linux Email & Proxy & Intranet Web server (FAQ , Sendmail, Squid
and such), 1 Web server (apache) and multiple print server
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Long
> Sent: Friday, 6 July 2001 13:16
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Leaf-user] LEAF flame wars :-)
>
>
> I was wondering if any of the LEAF mailing lists have
> encountered a flame
I forgot to mention that we are using PPTP on the VPN not IPSec, if this
makes any difference.
> Vance:
> Hard to say. Obviously, you can connect multiple clients to
> a VPN server if it's only one at a time: just switch the settings to
> show who should be connected, and re-start.
> But I suspe
I have sshd running stand-alone on EigerStein2BETA
PPPoE Image v.0.4. I'm using Putty pscp 0.51 to send
and receive files from an internal workstation and
from an external workstation. I normally have only RSA
authentication working with a passphrase for a special
login account, then I su to root
I was wondering if any of the LEAF mailing lists have encountered a flame
war or two since the lists' creation.
I think that this is a great list with great users. On another list I use,
I was aked if I knew of any other list's that do not have flame wars. :-)
Dale.
__
Liam Tumulty wrote:
>
> Has someone modified the Dshield.org reporting script so that it runs on
> EigerStein? Out of the box I don't have all of the commands installed (it
> throws its first errors on WC and TR). Any suggestions?
You could use the busybox versions; just take the busybox configu
I just ordered a 64 meg compact flash - comes with ide adapter.
Dave Cinege described it on the LRP list. I just ordered one
for a thin server. Much more than what you should ever need for an
LRP box? Price $19 plus shipping. Should save lots of
power in the age of conservation.
cf
+ ide
Has someone modified the Dshield.org reporting script so that it runs on
EigerStein? Out of the box I don't have all of the commands installed (it
throws its first errors on WC and TR). Any suggestions?
-Liam
#!/bin/sh
# DShield bash client. V 0.0.1
#
# Parameters
#
# your dshield userid. l
Ahmad - you keep posting the same problem but you don't tell us anything new.
Did you try entering this on your LRP router?
ipchains -I forward -j ACCEPT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 192.168.2.0/24 -b
ipchains -I forward -j ACCEPT -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 192.168.3.0/24 -b
ipchains -I forward -j ACCEPT -s 19
Scott C. Best, 2001-07-04 11:52 -0700
> The really annoying part is that...most LEAF users
>aren't even running DNS on their firewall or on their LAN. Sure,
>we all *use* DNS, as clients, but my impression it that LEAF
>is used more to protect a LAN of users than a LAN of servers.
>Maybe
Daniel Hoffman, 2001-07-03 13:46 -0400
>Jul 2 23:13:07 PenguiNoise pppd[743]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
>Jul 2 23:13:08 PenguiNoise chat[745]: send (AT^M)
>Jul 2 23:13:08 PenguiNoise chat[745]: expect (OK)
>Jul 2 23:13:08 PenguiNoise chat[745]: ^M
Daniel,
I apologize for the delayed r
I am using LRP 2.9.8 with four ethernet cards and four computers are
attached to it .The problem i am facing is that the computer attached to LRP
and pinging to the LRP and vice versa .But the computers are not pinging to
each other.The computer attached to eth0 (192.168.1.2) is com puter A w
Kevin wrote:
Thanks Scott
I even fired up Echowall and still had my log files go out the roof
with
those dang packets
I will search my conf files and see where I can input those two filters
to
see if that stops the logging
archive
message
the List of IPs I block is here:
hanroute: -root-
#
"Brent P. Gardner" wrote:
> If this is true then the entries you should use
> in /etc/modules are:
>
> ppp_mppe -o ppp-compress-18
> bsd_comp -o ppp-compress-21
> ppp_deflate -o ppp-compress-24
> ppp_deflate -o ppp-compress-26
>
> Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Sounds right to me - bu
Vance:
Hard to say. Obviously, you can connect multiple clients to
a VPN server if it's only one at a time: just switch the settings to
show who should be connected, and re-start.
But I suspect you're asking about doing it simultaneously.
This is tricky. In fact, I suspect it's not
Thanks Scott
I even fired up Echowall and still had my log files go out the roof with
those dang packets
I will search my conf files and see where I can input those two filters to
see if that stops the logging
-Original Message-
From: Scott C. Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: W
-Original Message-
From: Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Leaf-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Help with DNS error logs on Eiger2Beta with
PPPoP Attn; Charles or Victor
HELP!!
I tried to search via Geocrawler for DNS and
here is the screen dump of top.lrp on my PI/75 with ISA cards running 32 meg
ram with one computer downloading an ISO from redhat, while my pc box had
Download meter running at 159.3 kB/sec
7:02am up 14:22, 1 user, load average: 0.30, 0.35, 0.27
22 processes: 19 sleeping, 3 running, 0 zombie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dang, according to the poptop setup faq I need to put 4 alias lines in it.
>
> alias ppp-compress-18 ppp_mppe
> alias ppp-compress-21 bsd_comp
> alias ppp-compress-24 ppp_deflate
> alias ppp-compress-26 ppp_deflate
>
> Is there another place I can put this in? Would /
Kevin:
If you want...just stick 'em in section 11 of
the echowall.rules file. That'll do it.
-Scott, working on a rev...
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Kevin wrote:
> Thanks Scott
>
> I even fired up Echowall and still had my log files go out the roof
> with those dang packets
>
> I will se
Hello,
We are currently use and older version of LPR for our gateway/firewall. I
would like to upgrade to a later version and add VPN/IPSEC capabilities.
With our current setup we have one Static IP address.
We are using LPR for NAT, Port forwarding (WEB, FTP, MAIL) to internal
servers. It is
On Wednesday 04 July 2001 12:55 am, you wrote:
> Aanhalen Jeff Newmiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Kim Oppalfens wrote:
> > > Hi listmembers,
> > >
> > >
> > > I am looking for the file that would replace the modules.conf file of
> > >
> > > a normal complete linux distribution
I was one of the people having trouble with Intel
EtherExpress NICs.
The wise ones of the list suggested to me this format
to use in
/etc/modules:
(module name) -o (alias) (options to pass to module)
Kim, if I'm understanding your post correctly one of
your modules is
ppp_mppe and the ali
25 matches
Mail list logo
