HI AGAIN,
I am new to LEAF and have just got my Leaf system running.
However, I have been reading about dropbear, dropbearkeys, and SSH and it seems if
these have to do with some sort of remote admin packages. Am I right? Is there some
good beginer information you could point me to to read ab
> At 16:44 15.07.2004 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I 've noticed that when installing the default shorewall configuration of=
> Bering-*
> >there is no block of rfc1918 packets going out to NET
> >That is traceroute from LOC of any address not included in LOCAL LAN but in=
> the RF
Hi
OK, the following link really solved the problem:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16980.html
But Iam asking if this solution is a good one because of disabling the
rule ALL : ALL in /etc/hosts.deny ?
Gabriel
Erich Titl wrote:
Gabriel
At 17:06 15.07.2004 +0200, Gabriel Mueller
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Conrad
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 3:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [leaf-user] Using LEAF (Bering-uClibc) as a router
> (no shorewall)
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to use LEAF as a simpl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom,
Thanks, I have been teaching myself how to read the logs. What are the
indications that I should look for?
A message that says that your connection tracking table is full and that
packets are being dropped.
And what would cause the connection
tracking table to be fu
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Richard Doyle wrote:
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:32:41 -0700
From: Richard Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Using LEAF (Bering-uClibc) as a router (no shorewall)
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 14:58, Ben Conrad wrote:
Hello,
I want to use LEAF as a
Tom,
Thanks, I have been teaching myself how to read the logs. What are the
indications that I should look for? And what would cause the connection
tracking table to be full? An error in the way I set up the system?
Matt
Date sent: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:12:39 -0700
From:
Ben
At 23:58 15.07.2004, Ben Conrad wrote:
Hello,
I want to use LEAF as a simple router inside my internal networks. I
don't need any firewalling or NAT.
What is the best way to turn off all the Shorewall and IPTables
configurations so that I can pass all traffic in/out of eth0 and eth1?
I tried
Tom
At 21:54 15.07.2004, Tom Eastep wrote:
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Erich Titl wrote:
Hi Folks
I have a requirement to bridge multiple ports on a single network and
filtering packets between these ports based on mac and/or Ip addresses.
Can I do that using ebtables? Does anyone have any experi
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 14:58, Ben Conrad wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to use LEAF as a simple router inside my internal networks. I
> don't need any firewalling or NAT.
>
> What is the best way to turn off all the Shorewall and IPTables
> configurations so that I can pass all traffic in/out of eth0
Hello,
I want to use LEAF as a simple router inside my internal networks. I
don't need any firewalling or NAT.
What is the best way to turn off all the Shorewall and IPTables
configurations so that I can pass all traffic in/out of eth0 and eth1?
I tried to rename /etc/rc2.d/S41shorewall and the
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Erich Titl wrote:
Hi Folks
I have a requirement to bridge multiple ports on a single network and
filtering packets between these ports based on mac and/or Ip
addresses. Can I do that using ebtables? Does anyone have any
experience with such a situation?
I don't know
UmOn Thu, 2004-07-15 at 07:38, Thomas Wille wrote:
> Hello Community,
>
> I have Bering 1.2 Installation which works as a router between analog modem
> and local ethernet, e-mail-server etc. It has been running on several boxes
> without problems.
>
> Now I built a box for this installation out o
Hello Tom,
TE> firewall/router and has no native support for doing so. The OP needs to
TE> insert the appropriate rules into the mangle table POSTROUTING chain to
TE> set TTL as required. The iptables commands can be placed in the
TE> /etc/shorewall/start file.
i exactly planned to do this, but
Charles
interesting approach do you do any mac based filtering?
At 10:22 15.07.2004 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>Erich Titl wrote:
>
>>Hi Folks
>>I have a requirement to bridge multiple ports on a single network and filtering
>>packets between these ports based on mac and/or Ip addresses.
Erich Titl wrote:
Hi Folks
I have a requirement to bridge multiple ports on a single network and filtering packets between these ports based on mac and/or Ip addresses. Can I do that using ebtables? Does anyone have any experience with such a situation?
I don't know about bridging, but you can do w
At 16:44 15.07.2004 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I 've noticed that when installing the default shorewall configuration of Bering-*
>there is no block of rfc1918 packets going out to NET
>That is traceroute from LOC of any address not included in LOCAL LAN but in the
>RFC1918 range will
Tom
At 07:32 15.07.2004 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
>Erich Titl wrote:
>>Paul
>>At 21:23 14.07.2004 +0200, Yazgot wrote:
>>
>>>Hello !
>>>
>>>Recently i figured out i need to change TTL of all outgoing packets to
>>>the same value eg 64. Behind bering box is NATed 3 computers network
>>>and i need to
Gabriel
At 17:06 15.07.2004 +0200, Gabriel Mueller wrote:
>Hi
>
>bash-2.05b# telnet 22
>Trying ...
>Connected to .
>Escape character is '^]'.
>(a few seconds nothing happens)
>Connection closed by foreign host.
You should at least see something like this, possibly you are right sshd seems to not
Hi Folks
I have a requirement to bridge multiple ports on a single network and filtering
packets between these ports based on mac and/or Ip addresses. Can I do that using
ebtables? Does anyone have any experience with such a situation?
Thanks
Erich
THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mail
Hello Community,
I have Bering 1.2 Installation which works as a router between analog modem
and local ethernet, e-mail-server etc. It has been running on several boxes
without problems.
Now I built a box for this installation out of a Ali Motherboard S7AX, 192MB
Ram, an AMD K6-200 CPU, and a 3c5
Erich Titl wrote:
Paul
At 21:23 14.07.2004 +0200, Yazgot wrote:
Hello !
Recently i figured out i need to change TTL of all outgoing packets to
the same value eg 64. Behind bering box is NATed 3 computers network
and i need to make all outgoing traffic look like it is originating
from one machine.
I 've noticed that when installing the default shorewall configuration of Bering-*
there is no block of rfc1918 packets going out to NET
That is traceroute from LOC of any address not included in LOCAL LAN but in the
RFC1918 range will go out and traverse the net( Default route ).
Who is re
Hi
bash-2.05b# telnet 22
Trying ...
Connected to .
Escape character is '^]'.
(a few seconds nothing happens)
Connection closed by foreign host.
- is sshd showing up in the process table (ps -ef)
Yes: root 964 S /usr/sbin/sshd
- do you allow port 22 access to the firewall
Yes: Working with shorewa
Gabriel
At 13:01 15.07.2004 +0200, Gabriel Mueller wrote:
>Hi again
>
>| Do you allow password authentication or only RSA?
>| If you allow RSA only then you have to use a valid key.
>
>I checked my sshd_conf (or better said, I compared it with another sshd_conf on an
>bering-machine (Bering,
Hi again
| Do you allow password authentication or only RSA?
| If you allow RSA only then you have to use a valid key.
I checked my sshd_conf (or better said, I compared it with another sshd_conf on an
bering-machine (Bering, not Bering-uclib)) and there is no difference between both.
And on the
Gabriel
At 01:59 15.07.2004 +0200, Gabriel Mueller wrote:
>Hi all
>
>Iam having some trouble to get sshd to work on a uclib-bering 2.1.1 .
>These are the packages Iam using:
>(Iam giving the full link, so you can check if Iam using the right versions of
>packages)
>http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pac
Hi all, kernel security advisory: kernel 2.6 Remote DoS vulnerability. I
think kernel 2.4 is not affected.
- Mensaje reenviado
De: Tim Yamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200
28 matches
Mail list logo
