Re: [leaf-user] Upgrading to new version of Bering-U on WRAP box

Hi M M Lu wrote: Hi Erich, That's excellent idea. I will definitely try. Is there anyway to test the CF on a full Linux box? I have FC3 and I used that box to prepare the CF but I do not know how to test that CF to make sure it boots correctly etc. In the old day with CD/floppy Bering, I

[leaf-user] Radius Server

I see that the Bering-uClibc variant has a radius server package. I have a few question involved in using this as a RADIUS server. Has anyone managed to install a LEAF/LRP-based RADIUS server? Where is the RADIUS configuration stored and configured? Can the radius.lrp packaged be traded for

[leaf-user] KLIPS IPSEC

Hi All, I'm getting the following behavior on bering 2.3. I just rebooted my firewall (which was working beautifully) and now I'm having problems with my windows VPN. Here's what I get. Pinging [192.168.0.13] with 32 bytes of data: Negotiating IP Security. Negotiating IP

Re: [leaf-user] Radius Server

Am Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2006 19:03 schrieb Hillel Seltzer: I see that the Bering-uClibc variant has a radius server package. I have a few question involved in using this as a RADIUS server. Has anyone managed to install a LEAF/LRP-based RADIUS server? Where is the RADIUS configuration

Re: [leaf-user] Radius Server

Is it safe to remove the shorewall package if the device is only being used for a RADIUS server and not for a firewall? --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new

Re: [leaf-user] Radius Server

Yes, packages you don't use can be removed. If you don't uses shorewall you can also remove ulogd. You also have to remove the entries in leaf.cfg. Eric Is it safe to remove the shorewall package if the device is only being used for a RADIUS server and not for a firewall?

Re: [leaf-user] KLIPS IPSEC

Hello Julie, Hi All, I'm getting the following behavior on bering 2.3. I just rebooted my firewall (which was working beautifully) and now I'm having problems with my windows VPN. Here's what I get. Pinging [192.168.0.13] with 32 bytes of data: Negotiating IP Security.

Re: [leaf-user] KLIPS IPSEC

Hi interesting, so the KLIPS not working will break windows VPN but not VPN for linux boxen? i have a remote user using linux VPN and he's fine. curious. --jsl Eric Spakman wrote: Hello Julie, Hi All, I'm getting the following behavior on bering 2.3. I just rebooted my firewall

Re: [leaf-user] KLIPS IPSEC

Hi Julie, Hi interesting, so the KLIPS not working will break windows VPN but not VPN for linux boxen? I'm not sure about that. If you never change rp_filter before (left it in its default enable state) and it was working, I doubt if that's the problem. The KLIPS may not work message is

Re: [leaf-user] KLIPS IPSEC

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Julie S. Lin wrote: Hi interesting, so the KLIPS not working will break windows VPN but not VPN for linux boxen? i have a remote user using linux VPN and he's fine. curious. The KLIPS warning, and the route filtering, is a problem with some

[leaf-user] Madwifi for Bering 2.4b1 works (Finally!)

I will send you a complete set of modules, madwifi.lrp and wireless.lrp with the latest HAL update from yesterday. Yahoo! it works! (sort of). THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU! Eric, after you sent me the newest packages and modules I loaded them on my backup router. When I loaded the