Re: [leaf-user] Please help adding virtual interfaces

2006-02-21 Thread Jack Coates
Ricardo Kleemann wrote: Hi, I want to add virtual interfaces, like eth0:0, eth0:1, etc... that have a different network and mask as my current addresses. you can do it in /etc/network/interfaces, here's mine: #eth2 faces clients auto eth2 iface eth2 inet static address 192.168.11.254 n

[leaf-user] Please help adding virtual interfaces

2006-02-21 Thread Ricardo Kleemann
Hi, I want to add virtual interfaces, like eth0:0, eth0:1, etc... that have a different network and mask as my current addresses. Can those be added in the /etc/network/interfaces file? How do I configure ip aliases in the interfaces file? Or should I add them through shorewall? I tried ad

Re: [leaf-user] ipp2p

2006-02-21 Thread Paul Traina
I would STRONGLY suggest using shorewall version 3 for TOS, There's a bunch of new support there. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that

Re: [leaf-user] traffic shaping - video

2006-02-21 Thread Ron Senykoff
> I've since then discovered qbox.lrp on Sourceforge. It appears to be version > 1.1. Would that work with the existing Bering uClibc distro? > > Also, I did not see anything regarding ipp2p. > > ~Doug qbox.lrp will work on the existing uClibc distro. You will need to add in bash, htb, and suppor

RE: [leaf-user] ipp2p

2006-02-21 Thread Doug Sampson
Thanks for the info, Eric. I am going to try replacing the existing modules and test Shorewall's traffic shaping feature. Video isn't implemented heavily around here just yet. And I do know the exact ports used in our video apps which makes it easier for me to implement queuing properly. Any idea

RE: [leaf-user] traffic shaping - video

2006-02-21 Thread Doug Sampson
I've since then discovered qbox.lrp on Sourceforge. It appears to be version 1.1. Would that work with the existing Bering uClibc distro? Also, I did not see anything regarding ipp2p. ~Doug > -Original Message- > From: Ron Senykoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2