Recently there were some posts about set-up multiple IPs to one NIC in Bering.
I am interested in the setup but mine is 'Dachstein' and in my case I can get 2
dynamic IPs, not static.
Could you help me with that?
Specifically I would like to have eth0:0 and eth0:1 be assigned the IPs given
Hello, my son would like to do file xfer with a friend using ICQ. How would I go about
configuring that?
I am using DCD.
Thank you.
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
Here is the only command I have in my /etc/ipchains.forward (credited to
Charles Steinkuehler) to route between 192.168.9.x and 192.168.3.x
internal subnets
$IPCH -A forward -j ACCEPT -s 192.168.9.0/24 -d 192.168.3.0/24 -b
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
You can look at links on how to set up passive FTP server behind firewall on
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net/.
Basically you need to do the setup on both router and FTP server.
- On the router you port-forwarding port 20, 21 and a some additional ports (e.g.
65520-65529 as in the email
Hi,
After successful FreeS/WAN setup with 2 subnets using Daschtein CDs on
both sides, I try to set up for the Road-Warrior on XP/W2K. I tried the
steps for built-in IPSEC as Chad suggested
(http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/buipsec.html#AEN1227) but
always got stuck at the step
l) select
It would be definitely great. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Upali
Weerasinghe
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 6:42 AM
To: Chad Carr; Charles Steinkuehler
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] VPN
Thank you very very much, Charles, I could ping the other private
machines and I am asking them to ping me and use a couple of services on
my private server for thorough test. I hope it will be fine.
The next step for me is to setup for the Road Warrior. I have 2
questions:
1. Do you know of
192.168.9 and .3 are my private, so adding the rule as you suggested is for them only,
right.
For accessing 192.168.1 (the remote ipsec private), do I have to do the similar thing,
i.e.:
$IPCH -A forward -j ACCEPT -s 192.168.9.0/24 -d 192.168.1.0/24 -b
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] VPN error, please help
From: MLU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I strongly hope that's my mistake somewhere and not the ISP's. If the
ISP
blocks the IPSEC, could I connect to my office's VPN server? I still can
do
that before this experiment (removing ipsec module...).
The bad
: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:47 AM
To: MLU
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] VPN error, please help
The error is probably due to trying to ping without IPSec running, but
with
some ipchains rules left over (like the forward rule that allows traffic
between your two private networks
Hi Charles and Lynn.
Thank you for your suggestions. Things are not changed much after
I did the following as you advised:
- As per Lynn's remark, I now use only one /etc/ipsec.conf on
both sides. The FreeSWAN doc said that you may need to change
the line interfaces=, but they are
I strongly hope that's my mistake somewhere and not the ISP's. If the ISP blocks the
IPSEC, could I connect to my office's VPN server? I still can do that before this
experiment (removing ipsec module...).
The bad (and probably good -:)) news is that I do not see anything logged into
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] VPN error, please help
Hi Charles MLu,
I'm having similar problems, and have found this thread helpful. I've
been wondering, do we have to declare the routing on the gateways, or
shouldn't ipsec handle this? Also, what if the ipsec
Thank you Charles.
After making the RSA right, I restarted the ipsec service on both
side and then I try to ping a machine on 192.168.1.x from 192.168.9.x subnet but the
ping times out and there is nothing in auth.log or syslog suggesting a reason.
Could you please suggest what I should look
Thank you very Charles, I will modify the RSA key in the config when I
get home.
In the network.conf I have
EXTERN_PROTO0=50 0/0
EXTERN_PROTO1=51 0/0
and
EXTERN_UDP_PORTS=0/0_500
on both sides
so I think I do not have to set firewall=yes, right?
MLU
-Original Message-
From
Thank you Charles. Do you mean 'bang' by hitting some random keys, several times, and
by 'cat' as e.g.
cat file1 file2 and so on
I am doing it now but see no efect yet.
-- Original Message --
From: Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu,
I am doing remotely so that's why. Will do it when at home and after attaching a
monitor. Outch!!!
Thanks a lot, Charles.
-- Original Message --
From: Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:40:14 -0500
Thank you Charles. Do
Thank you Charles.
I will try to find somebody running Dachstein firewall and test with them. But then I
need to modify my internal subnet so that it is different from the one on their
system. For e.g., 192.168.9.x instead of 192.168.1.x, as probably they will use
192.168.1.x by default.
Is
, this
forces data throttling to 5 bytes (see the -t option above) referring to this issue?
P.S. Here is the output from running nmap against port 27
[root@rogers mlu]# nmap -p 27 -O 24.x.x.x
Starting nmap V. 2.53 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
Interesting ports on 24.x.x.x):
Port
19 matches
Mail list logo
