[leaf-user] Fwd: Re: [Shorewall-users] v3.4.x problems on Bering-uClibc

I am forwarding this to the list, Regards Harry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to setup Bering uClibc 3.1 beta 1, =20 However When I try to insert some config in shorwall/tcdevices and tccl= asses=20 shorewall check complains with these --

[leaf-user] CVS problem ??

I am faced with this problem After ./buildtool.pl remove shorewall and ./buildtool.pl source shorewall to get it from CVS but for some reason it downloads some page from sorceforge instead of buildtool.cfg My CVS checkout is cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/leaf login cvs -z3 -d

Re: [leaf-user] CVS problem ??

Thanks Martin It seems that tinyproxy ( running on my firewall or its parent, I use my providers proxy gateway ) did something bad. After I bypassed the proxy it seems to be running ok. Regards, Harry. PS. By the way I have compiled dansguardian for Bering-uClibc and it seems ok - so far.

[leaf-user] packages problems ???

I am trying to setup Bering uClibc 3.1 beta 1, However When I try to insert some config in shorwall/tcdevices and tcclasses shorewall check complains with these -- Validating /etc/shorewall/tcdevices... sed: bad option in substitution expression sed: bad

Re: [leaf-user] Dansguardian compilation

Sorry pal, I was in a hurry and pressed reply ... you have made it up though, Now in the real fun stuff, I 've downloaded the dansguardian tgz file from the dansG site .. It builds ok somehow However ldd shows linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000) libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7f56000)

[leaf-user] Dansguardian compilation

Hi all, I would appreciate any help regarding dansguardian compilation for our uClibc buildtool env. I' ve managed to reach installation but for some reason ( my buildtool.mk is screwed ) it tries to install everything under / and not in staging. Also ldd gives some weird results. Thanks

Re: [leaf-user] Asterisk - zaptel - bristuff Buildtool compilation

That Did it ... :-) Thanks a lot ... Given the chance, how am I about to cover the moh asterisk issue ?? From What I realize moh is an issue with this asterisk version The manual from asterisk.org states that the required version of mpg123 is v0.59r however the one that is in the cvs is 0.60

[leaf-user] Asterisk - zaptel - bristuff Buildtool compilation errors

I am trying to compile the entire source tree ( buildtool ) However Asterisk + zaptel + bristuff get stuck. I seem to miss newt-x-xx packages ?? Any clues is my cvs correct ?? export CVS_RSH=ssh cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/leaf login cvs -z3 -d :pserver:[EMAIL

Re: [leaf-user] Some questions ...

Thanks anyway, What I was looking for is located in shorewall/netmap, Still though I am wondering whether there is a chillispot.lrp package Kind Regards Harry Harry Lachanas wrote: I Would like to connect 2 lans over NET with openvpn ... problem is that both are using the same subnet

[leaf-user] 2.6 kernel ???

Is there any trial to port LEAF into 2.6 kernel??? I need the ipt_CLASSIFY which I am not able to locate it in the 2.4 kernel tree. Is there some link in the CVS tree that I can download and compile ( or at least try ). Regards Harry..

[leaf-user] mgetty Bering-uClibc

I am Trying to connect 2 Bering-uClibC v2.0 boxes --together--. dialin and dial out ON BOTH +-+ +--+ |LRP1 | -- | LRP2 | |ttyS0| | ttyS0| +-+ +--+ That is Both Having mgetty and Both Having pppd dial out connections. Both being

Re: [leaf-user] wshaper + tc

Hi At 16:28 20.08.2004 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to apply the wshaper script included=20 however I am gettting=20 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument after this=20 tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol ip prio 0 handle 2 fw

[leaf-user] wshaper + tc

I am trying to apply the wshaper script included however I am gettting RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument after this tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol ip prio 0 handle 2 fw classid 1:20 and this tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol ip prio

Re: [leaf-user] RFC1918 packets to NET

At 16:44 15.07.2004 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I 've noticed that when installing the default shorewall configuration of= Bering-* there is no block of rfc1918 packets going out to NET That is traceroute from LOC of any address not included in LOCAL LAN but in= the RFC1918

RE: [leaf-user] RFC1918 packets to NET

Hi! I 've noticed that when installing the default shorewall configuration of= Bering-* there is no block of rfc1918 packets going out to NET That is traceroute from LOC of any address not included in LOCAL LAN but in= the RFC1918 range will go out and traverse the

[leaf-user] RFC1918 packets to NET

I 've noticed that when installing the default shorewall configuration of Bering-* there is no block of rfc1918 packets going out to NET That is traceroute from LOC of any address not included in LOCAL LAN but in the RFC1918 range will go out and traverse the net( Default route ). Who is

[leaf-user] VOIP + Bering uClibc -- any version.....

I'am Trying to figure out some solutions with VOIP + VPN. There are three locations connected to each other with OPENvpn Over aDSL. I've looked at Asterisk.org and digium.com. ( HARDWARE ) Has any body accomplished somthing similar in any way ?? From my Point of view it would be great

Re: [leaf-user] PPPD and dynamic dns (pppoe)

Have a look in here http://www.openbrick.org/en/Members/seb/doc/reliable_vpn/view Hi everybody I am playing with ppp/pppoe and VPN connections on Bering boxes. The nature= of VPN requires the ipsec connections to be restarted when the IP address= on the gateway changes, Having little