[Leaf-user] Cacheing DNS question about 10.x.x.x zones

2001-10-03 Thread Matt Schalit
Hi Folks, I'm sort of confused, and maybe someones seen this. If I run a cacheing dns server somewhere on my private internal lan (10.x.x.x), then, by definition, it's not authoriative for my zone and just cache's query responses it gets back, correct? If you guys run a cacheing dns server,

Re: [Leaf-user] Cacheing DNS question about 10.x.x.x zones

2001-10-03 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> I'm sort of confused, and maybe someones seen this. > If I run a cacheing dns server somewhere on my private > internal lan (10.x.x.x), then, by definition, it's not > authoriative for my zone and just cache's query responses > it gets back, correct? > > If you guys run a cacheing dns server

RE: [Leaf-user] Cacheing DNS question about 10.x.x.x zones

2001-10-03 Thread Richard Doyle
> Hi Folks, > > I'm sort of confused, and maybe someones seen this. > If I run a cacheing dns server somewhere on my private > internal lan (10.x.x.x), then, by definition, it's not > authoriative for my zone and just cache's query responses > it gets back, correct? Right. > If you guys run a

Re: [Leaf-user] Cacheing DNS question about 10.x.x.x zones

2001-10-05 Thread Matthew Schalit
Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > > I'm sort of confused, and maybe someones seen this. > > If I run a cacheing dns server somewhere on my private > > internal lan (10.x.x.x), then, by definition, it's not > > authoriative for my zone and just cache's query responses > > it gets back, correct? >

RE: [Leaf-user] Cacheing DNS question about 10.x.x.x zones

2001-10-05 Thread Richard Doyle
> Richard, > > Thanks for the reply. I was hoping to find a method > where I didn't have to run a master DNS, though tinydns > sounds like the best solution. > > I'm not sure one could run it on their LRP without paying > extra to Wacbell. > > But a cacheing dns server that could somehow be

Re: [Leaf-user] Cacheing DNS question about 10.x.x.x zones

2001-10-06 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> How does it get back 10.1.2.2, if the dnscache is not > authoritative for it's zone, but rather it just caches > answers it gets from the net, and it can't ever get > the correct answer for 10.1.2.2 from the net > > These requests lead to dns timeouts and LAN delays. > > It's important for w

RE: [Leaf-user] Cacheing DNS question about 10.x.x.x zones

2001-10-06 Thread Richard Doyle
> > Dnscache+tinydns can be configured to do exactly what you > > describe. Bind > > dnscache to the internal interface of your LRP box and > > configure your > > internal hosts to use it as their DNS server. Bind tinydns > > to localhost > > (127.0.0.1) on the LRP box and load it with information