Jeff Newmiller wrote:
[snip]
AFAIK, ld -s and strip -s should have the same effect, but if you omit
the -s when you link (or compile/link, as with gcc) then you can debug
it before you strip it for shipping.
An interesting read is
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-shobj/
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Matt Schalit wrote:
Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Is there a difference between these, especially regarding libraries?
ld -s
strip -s
I'm sort of ignorant of the terminology, but I thought
that strip was for the executable ELF files, and that
OK, I'm rolling my own.
Yes, I know about strip for executables and this:
# ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-shared
Wow! The libraries are 300% larger!
What is the secret to minimizing space of shared libraries?
What do you think?
Michael D. Schleif wrote:
netsnmpd.lrp
OK, I'm rolling my own.
Yes, I know about strip for executables and this:
# ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-shared
Wow! The libraries are 300% larger!
What is the secret to minimizing space of shared libraries?
You can strip libraries too...
Charles Steinkuehler
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
OK, I'm rolling my own.
Yes, I know about strip for executables and this:
# ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-shared
Wow! The libraries are 300% larger!
What is the secret to minimizing space of shared libraries?
You can strip libraries too...
I never did test that package, sorry. I put it together on the assumption
that I would eventually use it, but that never happened. I apologize for
the
problems, I can build a better package if you would like, and verify that
this one works first.
If you do, please make note of the changes I
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
I never did test that package, sorry. I put it together on the assumption
that I would eventually use it, but that never happened. I apologize for
the
problems, I can build a better package if you would like, and verify that
this one works first.
If you
I suggest:
netsnmp.lrp
netsnmpd.lrp
netsnmptrapd.lrp
How about netsnmptrapd - netsnmpt (still an 8 character limit on ms-dos
fomatted floppies :
[3] I also have a working snmpd.conf, including working View-Based
Access Control Model (vacm) examples. In fact, my snmpd.conf does *not*
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
I never did test that package, sorry. I put it together on the assumption
that I would eventually use it, but that never happened. I apologize for
the
problems, I can build a better package if you would like, and verify that
this one works first.
If you
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
I suggest:
netsnmp.lrp
netsnmpd.lrp
netsnmptrapd.lrp
How about netsnmptrapd - netsnmpt (still an 8 character limit on ms-dos
fomatted floppies :
OK
[3] I also have a working snmpd.conf, including working View-Based
Access Control Model (vacm)
Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Michael D. Schleif wrote:
What is the secret to minimizing space of shared libraries?
You can strip libraries too...
Aha! Much, much better . . .
Live and learn ;
I though you knew you could strip libraries
but didn't
Is there a difference between these, especially regarding libraries?
ld -s
strip -s
Matt Schalit wrote:
Michael D. Schleif wrote:
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Michael D. Schleif wrote:
What is the secret to minimizing space of shared libraries?
You can
netsnmpd.lrp (4.2.1-1-CS) from DCD v1.0.2 appears to be broken.
[1] Changes to /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf do *not* affect snmpd.
Specifically, modifying syscontact and syslocation are *not* accessible
via snmpget nor snmpwalk, c.
[2] Such (example) changes can be effected if snmpd is started with
netsnmpd.lrp (4.2.1-1-CS) from DCD v1.0.2 appears to be broken.
It's possible...this was a last minute addition, and is still considered
experimental. I intend to switch to netsnmpd (and make some shell-script
reporting agents for ipchains accounting rules), but have yet to do so.
many
14 matches
Mail list logo
