Re: [Leaf-user] EIGRP (88) protocol ???

2001-12-07 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Regarding silent deny's...you can block the whole 224.0.0.0/4 range (RFC-1112 Class-D multicast) without worry. That catches IGMP, IGRP, EIGRP, and probably others. As you'd expect, this is in the same reduce my log noise section of

Re: [Leaf-user] EIGRP (88) protocol ???

2001-12-07 Thread David Douthitt
Michael D. Schleif wrote: However, how do I silently deny anything from any source that is destined for 255.255.255.255 ??? Since ATT Broadband moved me to the new network, I am flooded with this crap: PROTO=17 12.242.20.50:67 255.255.255.255:68 What do you think? That's the

Re: [Leaf-user] EIGRP (88) protocol ???

2001-12-01 Thread Scott C. Best
Michael: I'm sure it's possible with SILENT_DENY, I just don't use it. Charles will be able to provide details, no doubt. Here's the relevant portion from the echoWall rules file. Hope it helps! -Scott # -- next, block reserved-address traffic, a-la CIAC alert K-032 # --

Re: [Leaf-user] EIGRP (88) protocol ???

2001-12-01 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Regarding silent deny's...you can block the whole 224.0.0.0/4 range (RFC-1112 Class-D multicast) without worry. That catches IGMP, IGRP, EIGRP, and probably others. As you'd expect, this is in the same reduce my log noise section of echowall.rules. And, what is the best way

[Leaf-user] EIGRP (88) protocol ???

2001-11-30 Thread Michael D. Schleif
We just connected Dachstein-CD to a T-1 via Sangoma panpipe pci card. We are receiving a plethora of these: kernel: Packet log: input DENY wan PROTO=88 x.y.z.158:65535 224.0.0.10:65535 L=60 S=0xC0 I=0 F=0x T=2 (#39) Yes, we know that protocol 88 is EIGRP. No, Ethernet

RE: [Leaf-user] EIGRP (88) protocol ???

2001-11-30 Thread Eddie Wilson
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:09 PM To: LEAF Subject:[Leaf-user] EIGRP (88) protocol ??? We just connected Dachstein-CD to a T-1 via Sangoma panpipe pci card. We are receiving a plethora of these: kernel: Packet log: input DENY wan PROTO=88 x.y.z.158

Re: [Leaf-user] EIGRP (88) protocol ???

2001-11-30 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
kernel: Packet log: input DENY wan PROTO=88 x.y.z.158:65535 224.0.0.10:65535 L=60 S=0xC0 I=0 F=0x T=2 (#39) Yes, we know that protocol 88 is EIGRP. No, Ethernet http://www.echogent.com/cgi-bin/fwlog.pl does not recognize this. [1] Does this represent a problem? Or, is this a

Re: [Leaf-user] EIGRP (88) protocol ???

2001-11-30 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Charles, thank you! Charles Steinkuehler wrote: kernel: Packet log: input DENY wan PROTO=88 x.y.z.158:65535 224.0.0.10:65535 L=60 S=0xC0 I=0 F=0x T=2 (#39) Yes, we know that protocol 88 is EIGRP. No, Ethernet http://www.echogent.com/cgi-bin/fwlog.pl does not recognize this.

Re: [Leaf-user] EIGRP (88) protocol ???

2001-11-30 Thread Scott C. Best
Michael: Heya. Thanks for the packet log, am updating fwlog.pl to include an awareness of protocol 88. It knew about regular IGRP (IP protocol 9) but not this one. :) Regarding silent deny's...you can block the whole 224.0.0.0/4 range (RFC-1112 Class-D multicast) without worry.

Re: [Leaf-user] EIGRP (88) protocol ???

2001-11-30 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Scott C. Best wrote: Heya. Thanks for the packet log, am updating fwlog.pl to include an awareness of protocol 88. It knew about regular IGRP (IP protocol 9) but not this one. :) Regarding silent deny's...you can block the whole 224.0.0.0/4 range (RFC-1112 Class-D