I'm fishing a bit at this point, Michael. The thing not indicated in your
snips from the .config file for the *failing* sustem is IDE chipset support.
For *example*, my (working) 2.2.x kernel includes these .config lines:
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD640=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD640_ENHANCED is not set
CONFIG_
Ray Olszewski wrote:
>
> At 06:11 PM 12/14/01 -0600, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> [...]
> [irrelevancies about 2.0.x kernels and "ogriginal Slink" deleted]
> >Nevertheless, the problem remains -- the system does *not* recognize
> >/dev/hdb1.
> >
> >Any ideas how to correct this?
>
> Based on wha
At 06:11 PM 12/14/01 -0600, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
[...]
[irrelevancies about 2.0.x kernels and "ogriginal Slink" deleted]
>Nevertheless, the problem remains -- the system does *not* recognize
>/dev/hdb1.
>
>Any ideas how to correct this?
Based on what you've posted previously ... I'd second M
Ray Olszewski wrote:
>
> At 05:37 PM 12/14/01 -0600, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> ...
> >Interestingly, under the kernel that is functioning properly, there is
> >*NO* /proc/ide !?!?
> >
> ...
> >
> >So, how is this handling the IDE hdd? Is it using scsi to interpret
> >ide?
>
> It would be eas
