Re: [leaf-user] Is shorewall configured by default to drop/reject udp broadcasts?

2002-12-04 Thread youngdo
Thanks for the quick response. -Youngdo # iptables -nvL For future reference, /sbin/shorewall status is more useful. I've deleted all of the iptables output since my mailer is folding it but it showed that since you last restarted Shorewall, your firewall had ACCEPTed 14

Re: [leaf-user] Is shorewall configured by default to drop/reject udp broadcasts?

2002-12-04 Thread youngdo
One final suggestion -- you might consider checking the rulesets again (either in this fashion or the one Tom suggested, though I don't know if I'll be able to interpret Shorewall-specific reports) after some time has elapsed, just to be sure that the Samba retransmit failures have actually

Re: [leaf-user] Is shorewall configured by default to drop/reject udp broadcasts?

2002-12-03 Thread youngdo
In my experience, operation not permitted errors on LEAF routers typically (not always) signal problems with the firewall ruleset. In this context, I'd suspect that to mean not a problem with Shorewall's default settings (they are quite well tested by now) but one in some change you

Re: [leaf-user] Is shorewall configured by default to drop/reject udp broadcasts?

2002-12-03 Thread Ray Olszewski
You have rulesets in place that will pass state NEW SMB packets both ways between the firewall and the LAN. They are in these rule sequences: 14 2109 eth1_inah -- eth1 * 0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0 (in INPUT) 14 2109 loc2fw ah -- *

[leaf-user] Is shorewall configured by default to drop/reject udp broadcasts?

2002-12-02 Thread youngdo
Hi! Is shorewall configured by default to drop/reject udp broadcasts? I'm trying to setup samba and my windows machines can't see the samba server (which is also the firewall). I see the following errors in log.nmbd: [2002/12/02 16:58:02, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(794) Netbios nameserver

[leaf-user] Is shorewall configured by default to drop/reject udp broadcasts?

2002-12-02 Thread youngdo
Hi! I am a Bering v1.0-stable user. Is shorewall configured by default to drop/reject udp broadcasts? I'm trying to setup samba and my windows machines can't see the samba server (which is also the firewall). I see the following errors in log.nmbd: [2002/12/02 16:58:02, 0]

Re: [leaf-user] Is shorewall configured by default to drop/reject udp broadcasts?

2002-12-02 Thread Brad Fritz
On Tue, 03 Dec 2002 02:56:52 +0900 youngdo wrote: PiA+IFsyMDAyLzEyLzAyIDE2OjU4OjAyLCAwXQ0KPiA+IG5tYmQvbm1iZF9iZWNvbWVfZG1iLmM6 YmVjb21lX2RvbWFpbl9tYXN0ZXJfYnJvd3Nlcl9iY2FzdCgyOTEpDQo+ID4gYmVjb21lX2RvbWFp [Ick, another base64-encoded message. Grrr...] [2002/12/02 16:58:02, 0]

Re: [leaf-user] Is shorewall configured by default to drop/reject udp broadcasts?

2002-12-02 Thread Ray Olszewski
In my experience, operation not permitted errors on LEAF routers typically (not always) signal problems with the firewall ruleset. In this context, I'd suspect that to mean not a problem with Shorewall's default settings (they are quite well tested by now) but one in some change you made. To

Re: [leaf-user] Is shorewall configured by default to drop/reject udp broadcasts?

2002-12-02 Thread Kory Krofft
Try doing a search for the firewall in the windows find a computer option. My Bering - Samba server does not show up in the browse list. but works flawlessly. I have network drives mapped to it that reconnect on boot. You need rules to open net to fw for UDP 137 and 138 as well as tcp 139. Kory