Hi Paul,
> Has anyone looked at the Debian ucf package? If not, they should. I
> think it could be easily modified to work in a leaf package environment as
> an extension to lrcfg.
>
I took a quick look, but I'm not sure if if can be easely modified (at
least not by me :)) It heavely depends on
Has anyone looked at the Debian ucf package? If not, they should. I
think it could be easily modified to work in a leaf package environment
as an extension to lrcfg.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
On Behalf Of groups, freeman
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 10:38 PM
To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] RE: Bering uClibc Package Updates
I'm of the mindset that this is, for all practical intents and purposes,
ill advised and here's my reasoning.
The packages
I'm of the mindset that this is, for all practical intents and purposes,
ill advised and here's my reasoning.
The packages are the products of various authors, Tom Eastep for one.
Unless he and all contributors were to adhere to some protocol there's
the definite potential for problems.
Cons
I have considered created a tool to make the upgrade process easier, but wondered if others would find it as useful as I would.
If you are using Bering uClibc 2.3.1, have a good look at Webconf first.
It is much easier now than ever!
---
T
I have wondered if there was any better method for upgrading from a previous
version of Bering uClibc, and I assumed that what Charles said below was the
best possible solution. However, when I have upgraded, I have found that it is
better to just to a fresh new install, then cut and paste the o