I recently discoverd this little gem, gKrellm. It is a graphical tool to
monitor your system essentials but uses not much resources.
Ther is a server version gkrellmd which runs on a system an can sent
system information to another system to ber monitored.
As I use Behring already since 2 years, re
Hi,
It's a long time since I called upon this list as Leaf is the most quiet
system it runs on a stand system in my network and is so quiet you tend
to forget it is there (until you look in the log!).
As it is so unobtrusive, it is easy to forget, even when something
threatens to go wrong (e.g.
Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2010 16:01:44 schrieb Joep L. Blom:
> Hi,
> It's a long time since I called upon this list as Leaf is the most quiet
> system it runs on a stand system in my network and is so quiet you tend
> to forget it is there (until you look in the log!).
> As it is so unobtrusive, it i
KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2010 16:01:44 schrieb Joep L. Blom:
>> Hi,
>> It's a long time since I called upon this list as Leaf is the most quiet
>> system it runs on a stand system in my network and is so quiet you tend
>> to forget it is there (until you look in the log!).
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joep L. Blom wrote:
> KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>>
>> have you looked into sensors.lrp?
>> And if so, whats the difference to gkrellm?
>>
> It is simply that gkrellmd (the server variant)
> collects the data from sensors.lrp (I have that running) and it
Bodo Meissner wrote:
> Joep L. Blom wrote:
>> KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>>> have you looked into sensors.lrp?
>>> And if so, whats the difference to gkrellm?
>>>
>> It is simply that gkrellmd (the server variant)
>> collects the data from sensors.lrp (I have that running) and it can be
>> read by m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/9/2010 2:20 AM, Joep L. Blom wrote:
> Bodo Meissner wrote:
>> Joep L. Blom wrote:
>>> KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
have you looked into sensors.lrp?
And if so, whats the difference to gkrellm?
>>> It is simply that gkrellmd (the server v
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> On 2/9/2010 2:20 AM, Joep L. Blom wrote:
> While gkrellm does have a server and client component, it seems mainly
> geared towards desktop type systems with both the client and server
> running on the same machine.
>
> For remote monitoring of something like a LEAF f
0 12:21:16
To: Charles Steinkuehler
Cc:
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] gkrellm
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> On 2/9/2010 2:20 AM, Joep L. Blom wrote:
> While gkrellm does have a server and client component, it seems mainly
> geared towards desktop type systems with both the client and serv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/10/2010 5:21 AM, Joep L. Blom wrote:
> If one used SNMP then a daemon process must run that presents the data
> using th SNMP protocol, just as the gkrellm daemon presents the data in
> its own protocol (Idon't know what they use).
> Maybe it is
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 11:55 +, Paolo Scarabelli wrote:
> Hi Joep,
> There is a snmp plugin for gkrell, you can install the snmp daemon on
> the firewall as suggested by Charles and monitor it with the gkrell
> client.
Joep,
Palo is correct. See
gkrellm-snmp
http://packages.de
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 12:21 +0100, Joep L. Blom wrote:
> Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > On 2/9/2010 2:20 AM, Joep L. Blom wrote:
>
> > While gkrellm does have a server and client component, it seems mainly
> > geared towards desktop type systems with both the client and server
> > running on the
ry®
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Joep L. Blom"
> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:21:16
> To: Charles Steinkuehler
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [leaf-user] gkrellm
>
> Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>> On 2/9/2010 2:20 AM, Joep L. Blom wrote:
>
>> While
13 matches
Mail list logo
