Re: [leaf-user] tc filter 'action connmark' doesn't work

2016-02-18 Thread Erich Titl
Am 18.02.2016 um 23:44 schrieb Andrew: > Hi. > > Yes, I think that we should. > > About rate estimator - > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/272199 description (IMHO > it should be disabled by default); and IMHO we should add also > htb_hysteresis parameter here. maybe it needs a

Re: [leaf-user] tc filter 'action connmark' doesn't work

2016-02-18 Thread Andrew
Hi. Yes, I think that we should. About rate estimator - http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/272199 description (IMHO it should be disabled by default); and IMHO we should add also htb_hysteresis parameter here. 18.02.2016 01:38, Erich Titl пишет: > Hi Andrew > > Am 17.02.2016 um

Re: [leaf-user] tc filter 'action connmark' doesn't work

2016-02-17 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Andrew Am 17.02.2016 um 19:04 schrieb Andrew: > Or add sch_htb option to modprobe.conf (this is better and more common way) Shouldn't we add this to /etc/modprobe.d/sch_htp.conf cheers ET -- Site24x7 APM Insight:

Re: [leaf-user] tc filter 'action connmark' doesn't work

2016-02-17 Thread John Sager
Yes, you are right. It's also the way to specify parameters for modules that may not be loaded at boot time but need the parameter set if they are autoloaded or loaded via modprobe later. John On 17/02/16 18:04, Andrew wrote: > Or add sch_htb option to modprobe.conf (this is better and more

Re: [leaf-user] tc filter 'action connmark' doesn't work

2016-02-17 Thread Andrew
Or add sch_htb option to modprobe.conf (this is better and more common way) 17.02.2016 18:15, kp kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am Montag, 15. Februar 2016, 14:31:15 schrieb John Sager: >> I needed to apply some shaping on incoming traffic to preserve bandwidth for >> streaming services. bering-uclibc

Re: [leaf-user] tc filter 'action connmark' doesn't work

2016-02-17 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 15. Februar 2016, 14:31:15 schrieb John Sager: > I needed to apply some shaping on incoming traffic to preserve bandwidth for > streaming services. bering-uclibc version 5.2.4 appeared to offer the > necessary facilities - linux 4.1.16 supports it and apparently tc supports > it too but

Re: [leaf-user] tc filter 'action connmark' doesn't work

2016-02-15 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Am Montag, 15. Februar 2016, 14:31:15 schrieb John Sager: > I needed to apply some shaping on incoming traffic to preserve bandwidth for > streaming services. bering-uclibc version 5.2.4 appeared to offer the > necessary facilities - linux 4.1.16 supports it and apparently tc supports > it too but

[leaf-user] tc filter 'action connmark' doesn't work

2016-02-15 Thread John Sager
I needed to apply some shaping on incoming traffic to preserve bandwidth for streaming services. bering-uclibc version 5.2.4 appeared to offer the necessary facilities - linux 4.1.16 supports it and apparently tc supports it too but in actual fact, although tc accepts the 'action connmark' action