Karl
At 15:18 02.03.2004 -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
I've just moved a fire wall from Dachstein to Bering and have everything
working except one thing.
Before there was a set up where if I would:
ssh -P333 firewall.domain.com
The firewall would pass that on to a private server using port 22.
T
Try:
DNATnet loc:192.168.1.200:22 tcp 333
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:18:38PM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> I've just moved a fire wall from Dachstein to Bering and have everything
> working except one thing.
>
> Before there was a set up where if I would:
>
> ssh -P333 firewa
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 01:18 pm, Karl Schmidt wrote:
> I've just moved a fire wall from Dachstein to Bering and have everything
> working except one thing.
>
> Before there was a set up where if I would:
>
> ssh -P333 firewall.domain.com
>
> The firewall would pass that on to a private server usi
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering
Eddie Wilson wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> I do have the /29 being routed as you expected. I have had them assigned to
> the same interface as the p-t-p /30 address fo
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Eddie Wilson wrote:
Hi Charles,
I do have the /29 being routed as you expected. I have had them assigned to
the same interface as the p-t-p /30 address for the last 2 years and
running fine.
If there is a better (correct) way of doing this I would be greatfull for
Eddie Wilson wrote:
Hi Charles,
I do have the /29 being routed as you expected. I have had them assigned to
the same interface as the p-t-p /30 address for the last 2 years and
running fine.
If there is a better (correct) way of doing this I would be greatfull for
any advice.
Ipsec included
17, 2003 3:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering
Eddie Wilson wrote:
> Thanks Charles. I tried changing the interfaces statement and the result
> was as expected. I am not sure how I would
Eddie Wilson wrote:
Thanks Charles. I tried changing the interfaces statement and the result
was as expected. I am not sure how I would assign the extra addresses
differently. I am assigning the p-t-p address in my wanpipe configuration
and adding 2 of the extra 6 I have through Shorewall-NAT,
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering
Eddie Wilson wrote:
> I've included an ipsec-barf to demonstrate ipsec0 being assigned to an
> address other than the primary for that interface.
< very he
Eddie Wilson wrote:
I've included an ipsec-barf to demonstrate ipsec0 being assigned to an
address other than the primary for that interface.
< very helpful IPSec barf snipped>
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Wilson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 9:48 AM
To:
10 matches
Mail list logo