Re: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering

2004-03-02 Thread Erich Titl
Karl At 15:18 02.03.2004 -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote: I've just moved a fire wall from Dachstein to Bering and have everything working except one thing. Before there was a set up where if I would: ssh -P333 firewall.domain.com The firewall would pass that on to a private server using port 22. T

Re: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering

2004-03-02 Thread Lee Kimber
Try: DNATnet loc:192.168.1.200:22 tcp 333 On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:18:38PM -0600, Karl Schmidt wrote: > I've just moved a fire wall from Dachstein to Bering and have everything > working except one thing. > > Before there was a set up where if I would: > > ssh -P333 firewa

Re: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering

2004-03-02 Thread Tom Eastep
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 01:18 pm, Karl Schmidt wrote: > I've just moved a fire wall from Dachstein to Bering and have everything > working except one thing. > > Before there was a set up where if I would: > > ssh -P333 firewall.domain.com > > The firewall would pass that on to a private server usi

RE: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering

2003-12-18 Thread Eddie Wilson
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering Eddie Wilson wrote: > Hi Charles, > > I do have the /29 being routed as you expected. I have had them assigned to > the same interface as the p-t-p /30 address fo

Re: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering

2003-12-18 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Eddie Wilson wrote: Hi Charles, I do have the /29 being routed as you expected. I have had them assigned to the same interface as the p-t-p /30 address for the last 2 years and running fine. If there is a better (correct) way of doing this I would be greatfull for

Re: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering

2003-12-18 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Eddie Wilson wrote: Hi Charles, I do have the /29 being routed as you expected. I have had them assigned to the same interface as the p-t-p /30 address for the last 2 years and running fine. If there is a better (correct) way of doing this I would be greatfull for any advice. Ipsec included

RE: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering

2003-12-18 Thread Eddie Wilson
17, 2003 3:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering Eddie Wilson wrote: > Thanks Charles. I tried changing the interfaces statement and the result > was as expected. I am not sure how I would

Re: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering

2003-12-17 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Eddie Wilson wrote: Thanks Charles. I tried changing the interfaces statement and the result was as expected. I am not sure how I would assign the extra addresses differently. I am assigning the p-t-p address in my wanpipe configuration and adding 2 of the extra 6 I have through Shorewall-NAT,

RE: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering

2003-12-17 Thread Eddie Wilson
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering Eddie Wilson wrote: > I've included an ipsec-barf to demonstrate ipsec0 being assigned to an > address other than the primary for that interface. < very he

Re: [leaf-user] Moving from Dachstein to Bering

2003-12-17 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Eddie Wilson wrote: I've included an ipsec-barf to demonstrate ipsec0 being assigned to an address other than the primary for that interface. < very helpful IPSec barf snipped> -Original Message- From: Eddie Wilson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 9:48 AM To: