nts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Receiving DHCP broadcasts
>
> On Tuesday 04 March 2003 10:05 am, James Neave wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> You've sent us little detail and virtual
27;t give me any support.
>
> I do have sources of information about their network though.
>
> OK, that's it. Thanks!
>
> James
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Neave
> > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 1:21 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
.
I do have sources of information about their network though.
OK, that's it. Thanks!
James
> -Original Message-
> From: James Neave
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 1:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Receiving DHCP broadcasts
>
> I *think* I ge
I'll bring them
in tomorrow...
Jim
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Eastep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Receiving DHCP broadcasts
>
>
>
> --On Friday, February 2
--On Friday, February 28, 2003 10:47:14 AM + James Neave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
but apparently not blocking the UBR is very important.
A few questions about that log entry if I may?
According to the weblet, sorting the denied packets by IP address lists
all these packets as caused by
Thanks Tom,
> a) Be sure that you have set the 'dhcp' option for your external
interface
> in /etc/shorewall/interfaces.
> b) Because your ISP is using RFC 1918 addresses within its
infrastructure,
> you need to review Shorewall FAQ #14a
> (http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm#faq14a).
Yes, etc/shore
--On Thursday, February 27, 2003 05:09:39 PM + James Neave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hope that the calling PC will recognise the reply intended for it. As a
side-effect, every customer PC on the CATV network will also receive
these DHCP broadcast replies, all of which will appear to emanat
