Re: [LEAPSECS] inaugural effects of abandoning leaps

2013-01-22 Thread Clive D.W. Feather
Steve Allen said: > If without leap seconds the ITU-R regulations and recommendations > become self-inconsistent then an unfortunate event happening within > the day-long ambiguous interval coinciding with a change of insurance > policies could be deemed to be covered by none, one, or both policies

Re: [LEAPSECS] inaugural effects of abandoning leaps

2013-01-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In message <20130122010023.ga30...@ucolick.org>, Steve Allen writes: >On Mon 2013-01-21T12:13:26 -0700, Warner Losh hath writ: >If without leap seconds the ITU-R regulations and recommendations >become self-inconsistent then an unfortunate even