Poul-Henning Kamp said:
> This leapsecond is scheduled on a saturday, if they had used december past
> it would have been one of the more special fridays in the year, so it
> may be a concern for minimizing impact on commerce.
/me is confused
2011-12-31 was a Saturday. I was there.
2012-06-30 wil
In message , Rob Seaman writes:
>I had been expecting one this December just past, not next.
Indeed, but I notice three details:
This leapsecond is scheduled on a saturday, if they had used december past
it would have been one of the more special fridays in the year, so it
may be a concern for m
mike cook wrote:
> Le 05/01/2012 15:39, Zefram a écrit :
>> Markus Kuhn wrote:
>>> A positive leap second will be introduced at the end of June 2012.
>> Slight surprise there. It's the obviously-correct scheduling to minimise
>> |UT1-UTC|, but IERS has been favouring December in recent years,
>>
Follow the countdown...
http://www.leapsecond.com/java/nixie.htm
/tvb
___
LEAPSECS mailing list
LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
Le 05/01/2012 15:39, Zefram a écrit :
Markus Kuhn wrote:
A positive leap second will be introduced at the end of June 2012.
Slight surprise there. It's the obviously-correct scheduling to minimise
|UT1-UTC|, but IERS has been favouring December in recent years,
and there was plenty of slack to
Markus Kuhn wrote:
> A positive leap second will be introduced at the end of June 2012.
Slight surprise there. It's the obviously-correct scheduling to minimise
|UT1-UTC|, but IERS has been favouring December in recent years,
and there was plenty of slack to postpone this leap until December.
(Ac
--- Begin Message ---
>From bulc.iers-boun...@syrte4.obspm.fr Thu Jan 05 14:25:12 2012
Return-path:
Envelope-to: markus.k...@cl.cam.ac.uk
Delivery-date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:25:12 +
Received: from ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.152])
by mta0.cl.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
