s@leapsecond.com>>
Cc: LEAPSECS
<leapsecs-boun...@leapsecond.com<mailto:leapsecs-boun...@leapsecond.com>>
Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] countdown to WRC-15, CEPT ECC CPG
Rob
"LEAPSECS"
<leapsecs-boun...@leapsecond.com<mailto:leapsecs-boun...@leapsecond.com>>
Hi Rob,
On Mon 2015-10-05T06:25:25 -0700, Rob Seaman hath writ:
> Consensus already exists that ITU can do whatever it wants by
> defining a new timescale under a new name.
The web hits are consistent with ongoing negotiations between parties
who are forging their voting positions in private
Do you know the artist’s name? We had some artists-in-residence a few years
ago who heard the spiel about leap seconds.
—
> On Oct 5, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Steve Allen wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Mon 2015-10-05T06:25:25 -0700, Rob Seaman hath writ:
>> Consensus already exists
Rob
"LEAPSECS" <leapsecs-boun...@leapsecond.com> wrote on 10/05/2015 03:02:58
PM:
> From: Steve Allen <s...@ucolick.org>
> To: Leap Second Discussion List <leapsecs@leapsecond.com>
> Date: 10/05/2015 03:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] countdown to W
And the report of the International Astronomical Union’s UTC Working Group
describes a similar lack of consensus to what Steve describes:
http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/earthor/utc/report_WG_UTC_2014.pdf
Sometimes a lack of consensus implies a lack of interest. This is not such a
case.
WRC-15 is just a month hence. The deadline for submission of proposals
is October 19, and so far the contributions do not show anything related
to Agenda Item 1.14.
The final meeting of the European Conference of Postal and
Telecommunications Authorities (CEPT) Electronic Communications
st...@ntp.org
To: Leap Second Discussion List leapsecs@leapsecond.com
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] countdown to WRC-15
I've not been able to follow these discussions. I look forward to the
time when there's less pressure on my schedule.
Has anybody put
Thanks Steve, I was wondering what was going on (but lazily didn't go
hunting).
Did the question change? It seems like the current statement is more
elaborate, if seemingly somewhat tangled, from earlier versions?
...LEAPSECS/ITU-R/R15-WRC15PREPWORK-C-0008!!PDF-E.pdf
WRC-15 agenda item 1.14
Regional meetings continue about the fate of the leap second as
various bodies consider their position on WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.14.
http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/conferences/wrc/2015/Pages/reg-prep.aspx
shows that the Arab group just finished, and the European and Russian
meetings are still pending.
I've not been able to follow these discussions. I look forward to the
time when there's less pressure on my schedule.
Has anybody put forth the following position:
- The various current popular timescales are of significant value.
- (a variety of points covering the backstory, foundation, and
10 matches
Mail list logo