Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release 17.01.0 binary packages have changed and SDK inconsistency

2017-03-29 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 03/29/2017 06:08 AM, James Feeney wrote: > Realize? No - I'm still learning how this build process works in LEDE. My > impression is that you are distinguishing between "packages" and some other > type > of thing, which the lede-project.org site seems to implicitly, and > generically, > re

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release 17.01.0 binary packages have changed and SDK inconsistency

2017-03-29 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 03/29/2017 02:45 AM, Daniel Golle wrote: > I get that problem, and it can be solved easily by removing the git > commit hash from feeds.conf in the SDK and rather use the current > snapshot instead. > I agree that the lack of a lede-17.01 release branch on the package > feeds may cause weird a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/3][RFC] base-files: add option to rc.common to disable default reload behavior

2017-03-29 Thread Alexandru Ardelean
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Alexandru Ardelean > wrote: >> From: Alexandru Ardelean >> >> Traditionally if a reload script fails, it will fallback to restart. >> >> That seems to be the default behavior in case no reload >> handler ha

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] ar8327: Add workarounds for AR8337 switch.

2017-03-29 Thread John Crispin
On 26/03/17 10:08, Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam) wrote: - .phy_fixup = ar8327_phy_fixup, + //.phy_fixup = ar8337_phy_fixup, // not needed at the moment .set_mirror_regs = ar8327_set_mirror_regs, .get_arl_entry = ar8327_get_arl_entry, .sw_hw_apply = ar8327_sw_

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release 17.01.0 binary packages have changed and SDK inconsistency

2017-03-29 Thread Bastian Bittorf
* James Feeney [29.03.2017 10:15]: > Let me say again, I think that this is an important issue that the LEDE > project > needs to address and remedy. I believe that the ultimate credibility and > reputation of the LEDE project is at stake. what we do "internally": checkout LEDE and all feeds a

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release 17.01.0 binary packages have changed and SDK inconsistency

2017-03-29 Thread Daniel Golle
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:28:07AM +0200, Pau wrote: > On 29/03/17 02:45, Daniel Golle wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:55:09PM +0200, Pau wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, thanks for your reply. Find my comments in-line. > >> > >> On 28/03/17 22:37, Daniel Golle wrote: > >>> Hi Pau, > >>> > >>> On Tue,

Re: [LEDE-DEV] dnsmasq sometimes fails to start on 17.01.0

2017-03-29 Thread Gui Iribarren via Lede-dev
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 23/03/17 16:10, Gui Iribarren w

[LEDE-DEV] OpenSSL: question about package Makefile

2017-03-29 Thread Nino Benedetto
Hi all, I was looking at the openssl package Makefile and I have a question about that. The Build/Compile target is formatted in the following way: define Build/Compile +$(MAKE) $(PKG_JOBS) -C $(PKG_BUILD_DIR) \ CC="$(TARGET_CC)" \ ASFLAGS="$(TARGET_ASFLAGS) -I$(PKG_BUILD_DIR)/crypto -c" \ AR="$(T

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release 17.01.0 binary packages have changed and SDK inconsistency

2017-03-29 Thread James Feeney
Hi Alberto > Also the kernel is handled like a package for the build system, but > since most devices expect it outside of root filesystem in various ways, > it's added to the firmware image the way the device's bootloader expects it. I haven't seen a preferred term for the class of this combined

Re: [LEDE-DEV] dnsmasq sometimes fails to start on 17.01.0

2017-03-29 Thread Yousong Zhou
On 24 March 2017 at 03:17, Gui Iribarren via Lede-dev wrote: > The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows > sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. > > To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped > automatically by the mailing

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release 17.01.0 binary packages have changed and SDK inconsistency

2017-03-29 Thread Pau
On 29/03/17 09:16, Alberto Bursi wrote: > > > On 03/29/2017 02:45 AM, Daniel Golle wrote: >> I get that problem, and it can be solved easily by removing the git >> commit hash from feeds.conf in the SDK and rather use the current >> snapshot instead. >> I agree that the lack of a lede-17.01 relea

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH packages] libwebsockets: bump to 2.2.1

2017-03-29 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Rafał Miłecki For changes since 2.0.x see https://github.com/warmcat/libwebsockets/blob/v2.2-stable/changelog Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki --- libs/libwebsockets/Makefile | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libs/libwebsockets/Makefile b/libs/libwebsock

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release 17.01.0 binary packages have changed and SDK inconsistency

2017-03-29 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi Pau, I will not reiterate the arguments made elsewhere in this thread but merely describe why the version tagged 17.01.0 SDK uses fixed feed sources. The main objective here was to make the build reproducible in a way that you can use the 17.01.0 SDK to build artifacts resembling the released

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release 17.01.0 binary packages have changed and SDK inconsistency

2017-03-29 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 03/29/2017 05:39 PM, James Feeney wrote: > Hi Alberto > >> Also the kernel is handled like a package for the build system, but >> since most devices expect it outside of root filesystem in various ways, >> it's added to the firmware image the way the device's bootloader expects it. > I haven't

[LEDE-DEV] ar7 (TI AR7): update to kernel 4.4, please test

2017-03-29 Thread James Le Cuirot
On 09/18/2016 04:18 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > I updated the ar7 target to kernel 4.4 in this branch: > https://git.lede-project.org/?p=lede/hauke/staging.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kernel-4.4 > > If you have any device supported by this target please test it and > report back if the ar7 target

[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH packages] libwebsockets: set PROVIDES for all variants

2017-03-29 Thread Rafał Miłecki
From: Rafał Miłecki This allows software using libwebsockets to simply specify a libwebsockets dependency. Otherwise a specific variant (or set of them) would need to be specified. Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki --- libs/libwebsockets/Makefile | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 2/3][RFC] base-files: add option to rc.common to disable default reload behavior

2017-03-29 Thread Eric Luehrsen
On 03/29/2017 03:17 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Hans Dedecker wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Alexandru Ardelean >> wrote: >>> From: Alexandru Ardelean >>> >>> Traditionally if a reload script fails, it will fallback to restart. >>> >>> That seems

Re: [LEDE-DEV] dnsmasq sometimes fails to start on 17.01.0

2017-03-29 Thread Eric Luehrsen
On 03/29/2017 11:57 AM, Yousong Zhou wrote: > On 24 March 2017 at 03:17, Gui Iribarren via Lede-dev >> I continued yeterday further debugging this, i played with this >> particular number in /e/i/dnsmasq >> (line 815 in http://pastebin.com/FV09f2jG) >> >> procd_add_raw_trigger "interface.*" 200

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release 17.01.0 binary packages have changed and SDK inconsistency

2017-03-29 Thread Pau
On 29/03/17 20:57, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi Pau, > > I will not reiterate the arguments made elsewhere in this thread but > merely describe why the version tagged 17.01.0 SDK uses fixed feed sources. > > The main objective here was to make the build reproducible in a way that > you can use the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Release 17.01.0 binary packages have changed and SDK inconsistency

2017-03-29 Thread Matthias Schiffer
On 03/29/2017 08:57 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi Pau, > > I will not reiterate the arguments made elsewhere in this thread but > merely describe why the version tagged 17.01.0 SDK uses fixed feed sources. > > The main objective here was to make the build reproducible in a way that > you can us

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] ar8327: Add workarounds for AR8337 switch.

2017-03-29 Thread Vittorio G (VittGam)
Hello, On 29/03/2017 10:44:36 CEST, John Crispin wrote: > On 26/03/17 10:08, Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam) wrote: >> -.phy_fixup = ar8327_phy_fixup, >> +//.phy_fixup = ar8337_phy_fixup, // not needed at the moment >> .set_mirror_regs = ar8327_set_mirror_regs, >> .get_arl_entry =

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] ar71xx: Add TP-LINK TL-WR841N v12 support.

2017-03-29 Thread Vittorio G (VittGam)
Hello Piotr, On 27/03/2017 11:22:05 CEST, Piotr Dymacz wrote: > Hello Vittorio, > > On 26.03.2017 09:55, Vittorio Gambaletta (VittGam) wrote: >> This router has the same hardware of TP-LINK TL-WR841N v11 (same >> FCC ID, same TFTP image name...). >> >> The stock firmware web interface does not se

Re: [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v2] ar71xx: Add TP-LINK TL-WR841N v12 support.

2017-03-29 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 03/30/2017 06:21 AM, Vittorio G (VittGam) wrote: > > Thanks for your suggestion. I knew the exact contrary and in fact I'm > adding dot at end of subject every time... Do you know if there is some > place (that I might have very well missed if it exists...) where this > kind of style rules are