On 29/03/17 20:57, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi Pau,
>
> I will not reiterate the arguments made elsewhere in this thread but
> merely describe why the version tagged 17.01.0 SDK uses fixed feed sources.
>
> The main objective here was to make the build reproducible in a way
On 29/03/17 09:16, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
>
> On 03/29/2017 02:45 AM, Daniel Golle wrote:
>> I get that problem, and it can be solved easily by removing the git
>> commit hash from feeds.conf in the SDK and rather use the current
>> snapshot instead.
>> I agree that the lack of a lede-17.01 relea
On 29/03/17 02:45, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:55:09PM +0200, Pau wrote:
>> Hi Daniel, thanks for your reply. Find my comments in-line.
>>
>> On 28/03/17 22:37, Daniel Golle wrote:
>>> Hi Pau,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:2
Hi Daniel, thanks for your reply. Find my comments in-line.
On 28/03/17 22:37, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Hi Pau,
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:28:22PM +0200, Pau wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I am using the SDK and IB from LEDE 17.01.0 release (mips_24kc). I've
>> be
://github.com/libremesh/lime-sdk
On 28/03/17 21:28, Pau wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am using the SDK and IB from LEDE 17.01.0 release (mips_24kc). I've
> been using it successfully the last days until now. I did not change
> anything but I get the error:
>
> * opkg_install_pkg: Packag
Hi.
I am using the SDK and IB from LEDE 17.01.0 release (mips_24kc). I've
been using it successfully the last days until now. I did not change
anything but I get the error:
* opkg_install_pkg: Package luci-lib-nixio sha256sum mismatch. Either
the opkg or the package index are corrupt. Try 'opkg u
After playing I while I found that the order in repositories.conf is
relevant (not the name). So last is more preference.
So problem solved.
BTW, a comment on repositories.conf regarding this would be useful.
Cheets.
On 20/03/17 21:54, Pau wrote:
> Using ImageBuilder I would like to
Using ImageBuilder I would like to add preference to the local
repositories rather than the remote ones.
When the version number is the same it looks to me that it's kind of
random which feed is opkg using to install the packet.
Is there any rule for opkg to choose which repository to use when th
Fine.
Thank you.
On 13/03/17 20:09, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi Pau,
>
> the issue is known and has been fixed with 17.01.0 final, see
> https://lede-project.org/releases/17.01/changelog-17.01.0-final#section501
>
>
I downloaded the SDK [1] for 17.01.0-rc2 (ar71xx). The
feeds.conf.default file does not seem to be correct, this is the content:
src-git base https://git.lede-project.org/source.git;HEAD
src-git packages
https://git.lede-project.org/feed/packages.git^06198d9c8c1ba061a0a5d566545a5c0bbce2b0a4
src-gi
+1
I'm also missing the common [TAG] for this mailing list.
Thanks!
On 04/05/16 23:31, Aaron Z wrote:
> On many (most?) mailing lists, there is a prefix on all subjects which
> has the list name (such as [OpenWRT-Devel])
> Can this prefix be added for this list (or is that an option that I
> miss
11 matches
Mail list logo
