On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 04:50:09 AM Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
> Another sidenote is not really LedgerSMB related, other than it can use
> Plack and Starman. It seems that just installing Starman on a plain
> Ubuntu doesn't enable ipv6. After some searching and testing, I solved
> it with cpanm I
On Thursday, July 21, 2016 10:49:19 AM Michael Richardson wrote:
> Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
> > Ubuntu doesn't enable ipv6. After some searching and testing, I solved
> > it with cpanm IO::Socket::INET6. I don't know if you think it's worth
> > mentioning somewhere in the installation n
On Friday, May 13, 2016 04:32:44 AM Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> or (b) factor out the functions that we need in LedgerSMB::Database into a
> true library (with no dependency on Dancer).
Perhaps into the existing PGObject::Util::DBAdmin module? It's already
required for 1.5...
jame
--
All,
While testing package upgrades from v1.3.47 to v1.4.28 on Debian Jessie
(current stable) and Debian Stretch (current testing), the following type of
the error page comes up the first time using a normal login after upgrading a
company DB:
--
On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 11:44:41 AM Robert James Clay wrote:
> FYI; unless otherwise advised, the PGObject::Util::DBAdmin Perl module
> is the next one I will be packaging for Debian.
I do wonder about the App-LedgerSMB-Admin application, though. It's
currently
Chris,
FYI; unless otherwise advised, the PGObject::Util::DBAdmin Perl module is
the next one I will be packaging for Debian.
Jame
--
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
A
On Thursday, March 24, 2016 04:51:41 AM David G wrote:
> We believe items 1-3 NEED to happen, the remaining items SHOULD happen
> depending on your responses Only ever run LedgerSMB using Starman
> (High-performance preforking PSGI/Plack web server) Only ever bind Starman
> to localhost
> Always
All,
A preliminary version of Ubuntu packages for LedgerSMB v1.4.26 were made
available yesterday at our Launchpad PPA[1] and are available using the
following sources.list entry:
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ledgersmb/main/ubuntu VERSION main
Where in this case, "VERSION" is 'trusty' or 'wil
All,
A preliminary version of a Debian package for LedgerSMB v1.4.26 is now
available. Built for Debian 'stable' ("jessie"), the files are available with a
sources.list entry like this (As usual, the file checksums and md5sums are
listed in the *dsc file, which is gpg signed by me.):
deb http
All,
A preliminary version of a Debian package for LedgerSMB v1.4.25 is now
available; this includes a correction to theapache 2.4 related lines in the
installed ledgersmb-httpd-2.4.conf file. Built for Debian 'stable' ("jessie"),
the files are:
ledgersmb_1.4.25+ds-0jessie1_all.deb
ledgersmb_1
All,
A preliminary version of a Debian package for LedgerSMB v1.4.24 is now
available.
Built for Debian 'stable' ("jessie"), the files are:
ledgersmb_1.4.24+ds-0jessie1_all.deb
ledgersmb_1.4.24+ds-0jessie1.dsc
ledgersmb_1.4.24+ds.orig.tar.gz
ledgersmb_1.4.24+ds-0jessie1.debian.tar.xz
Those are
On Sunday, January 24, 2016 01:49:40 PM Chris Bennett wrote:
>
> I am porting all the PGObject modules into OpenBSD.
>
> But I am gettting a test failure:
I'm working on 'em for Debian but haven't really started on this one yet. I
tried a build & test on Debian Testing ('stretch') with Perl
On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 12:31:23 AM David G wrote:
>
> As you are aware I am working on a revamp of our existing Sysconfig.pm
> (handles sane defaults and reading config values from ledgersmb.conf).
> One of the changes to this will allow it to be used with any config file
> rather than a h
All,
A preliminary version of a Debian package for LedgerSMB v1.4.23 is now
available.
Built for Debian 'stable', the files are:
ledgersmb_1.4.23+ds-0jessie1_all.deb
ledgersmb_1.4.23+ds-0jessie1.dsc
ledgersmb_1.4.23+ds.orig.tar.gz
ledgersmb_1.4.23+ds-0jessie1.debian.tar.xz
And are available fr
se let me know about what
they might be.
Regards,
Robert James Clay
j...@rocasa.us
--
___
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
Ledger-smb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://l
On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 02:16:34 PM David G wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A while ago Erik and I were discussing the need to better document the
> various scripts and files that are not directly part of the LedgerSMB code.
That also brings to mind; do we have any requirement or 'best practice' to
On Thursday, December 31, 2015 09:50:59 AM David G wrote:
>
> It is worth pointing out that it is undesirable to use an OS package to
> provide dojo as there are known to be issues from minor release to minor
> release that would break LedgerSMB.
What are those issues and how do they break Led
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 04:14:36 AM Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> The project has been using one and the same key to sign releases for a
> long time. The key has a length of 1024 bits, a length now assumed to
> be susceptible to attacks.
>
> Should we create a new key?
Yes.
> What size?
On Sunday, November 22, 2015 11:43:11 AM Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Sunday, November 22, 2015 08:32:50 AM Chris Travers wrote:
> > Wonderng if we should release a 1.3.47 with all current fixes as the
> > likely final 1.3 release?
Is that something likely to happen soon? I
All,
The Perl modlule PGObject::Type::BigFloat is now in Debian as the package
libpgobject-type-bigfloat-perl v1.0.1-1. Barring any issues, it should
transition over to Debian Testing ('stretch') (as well as to Ubuntu) by next
week.
RJ Clay
j...@rocasa.us
--
All,
A preliminary version of a Debian package for LedgerSMB v1.4.20 is now
available. Built for Debian 'stable', the files are:
ledgersmb_1.4.20+ds-0jessie1_all.deb
ledgersmb_1.4.20+ds-0jessie1.dsc
ledgersmb_1.4.20+ds.orig.tar.gz
ledgersmb_1.4.20+ds-0jessie1.debian.tar.xz
from the LedgerSMB p
On Friday, December 04, 2015 06:38:48 PM David G wrote:
>
> Just having a quick dig around in the package.
Very much appreciate the feedback!
> doc/ledgersmb/UPGRADE.gz says
> Upgrading to LedgerSMB 1.3
Besides the (separate) issue of it's contents, I'm not sure that the file
itself ne
On Friday, December 04, 2015 06:38:48 PM David G wrote:
>
> Just having a quick dig around in the package.
>
> doc/ledgersmb/UPGRADE.gz says
> Upgrading to LedgerSMB 1.3
>
> >From LedgerSMB 1.3:
> First, upgrade 1.3 to the latest version. This ensures a stable version for
> migration purposes.
All,
A preliminary version of a Debian package for LedgerSMB v1.4.16 is available
as follows:
For Debian Jessie (current 'stable'), as:
ledgersmb_1.4.19+ds-0jessie1_all.deb
ledgersmb_1.4.19+ds-0jessie1.dsc
ledgersmb_1.4.19+ds.orig.tar.gz
ledgersmb_1.4.19+ds-0jessie1.debian.tar.xz
from the Led
A preliminary version of a Debian package for LedgerSMB v1.4.16 is available
as follows:
For Debian Jessie (current 'stable'), as:
ledgersmb_1.4.16-0jessie1_all.deb
ledgersmb_1.4.16+ds-0jessie1.debian.tar.xz
ledgersmb_1.4.16+ds-0jessie1.dsc
ledgersmb_1.4.16+ds.orig.tar.gz
from the LedgerSMB p
All,
On Monday, August 31, 2015 10:42:45 PM Robert James Clay wrote:
> ledgersmb_1.4.15+ds.orig.tar.gz
Note that a v1.4.x Debian source archive is repacked for use like that
without the embedded Dojo libraries, the packaging depends in the Debian Dojo
packages, and symlinks are instal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
All,
A preliminary version of a Debian package for LedgerSMB v1.4.15 is available
as follows:
For Debian Jessie (current 'stable'), as:
ledgersmb_1.4.15-0jessie1_all.deb
ledgersmb_1.4.15+ds-0jessie1.debian.tar.xz
ledgersmb_1.4.15+ds-0jessie1.dsc
All,
I've been testing (on Debian 8) the nginx-fcgirwrap configuration for LedgerSMB
v1.3 that was added to contrib back in January of 2014. It's seems to be
working well, so I've been investigating what patches are needed for it to
make it more usable for the Debian package. That looks to be
On Tuesday, April 07, 2015 04:41:40 PM Robert James Clay wrote:
> - Since I've found that the 'postgresl' user isn't usable for LSMB on Debian
> because of how it's set up, I added another user for this 1.4 install,
That has been an issue with the Debian pac
to 3.9.6 in debian/control, no changes required.
* Use dh-linktree for embedded libjs-prototype and libjs-libjs-scriptaculous
libraries.
* Only include the overrides for the 'custom' empty directories in the
ledgersmb.lintian-overrides.
-- Robert James Clay Wed, 29 Apr
On Tuesday, December 30, 2014 01:47:53 PM Rob Ransbottom wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 09:24:00AM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > On Monday, December 29, 2014 04:02:22 PM Rob Ransbottom wrote:
> > > Looks like namespace::autoclean needs to be added
> >
On Monday, December 29, 2014 04:02:22 PM Rob Ransbottom wrote:
> Looks like namespace::autoclean needs to be added
> as a dependency (1.4.9).
>
How do you mean? It shows as being required in Makefile.pl...
Unless you're referring in for dists/rpm/ledgersmb.spec? (Which I notice
does not
ged in & checked) is not the
package name I expected...
Robert James Clay
j...@rocasa.us
rjc...@gmail.com
--
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 12:45 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote in
ledger-smb-devel:
> I'm gonna run from the SVN checkout (actually my private tree), but I
> want to use your package eventually. It might be useful to split the
> package into a virtual package "ledgersmb-dependancies" (with the list
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 12:45 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Robert James Clay wrote:
> >> my /usr/share/perl5/Math/BigFloat.pm would have been installed
> >> from debian. It is version 1.997, and it's from the same
> >> libmath-bigi
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 15:25 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> I had this problem with 1.3.18 on recurring transactions, and I knew
> I had to upgrade, so I'm running tip-of-SVN 1.3.23.
Actually, I'd think that the SVN 'tip' is a few revisions past
v1.3.23...
> my /usr/share/perl5/Math/Bi
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 19:10 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> I did start the project there
More precisely, I started the Team; a 'Project' at Launchpad is a
different thing, but one I've also been thinking about.
> but the one for Lucid failed to build and
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 07:45 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 20:54 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> >What made it in is v1.3.18-1 of the LedgerSMB package, and that is
> > what is currently available in Ubuntu v12.10; newer versions (currently,
> >
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 20:54 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
>What made it in is v1.3.18-1 of the LedgerSMB package, and that is
> what is currently available in Ubuntu v12.10; newer versions (currently,
> v1.3.22)
More correctly; that is package version v1.3.21-2, which is now
ava
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 04:28 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Robert James Clay
> wrote:
> >I'm investigating what is needed to get LedgerSMB packages
> > backported to, for instance, the Ubuntu LTS versions like v10.04 or
>
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 20:54 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
>What made it in is v1.3.18-1 of the LedgerSMB package, and that is
> what is currently available in Ubuntu v12.10; newer versions (currently,
> v1.3.22) will migrate when the auto migration from Debian is enabled
> agai
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 11:23 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> I understand that the feature freeze for Ubuntu
> 12.10 will be in August, so which version of LedgerSMB makes it in there
> will depend on which version makes it into Debian unstable by that time.
What made it in is
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 14:18 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> 3) The recommended module Math::BigInt::GMP is not listed.
It's not explicitly listed in the INSTALL document but is referenced
in Makefile.PL. However; shouldn't it be listed there as
Math::BigInt::GMP, rather than
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 14:18 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> 4) I think the section starting with the "perl Makefile.PL" line section
> header,
Or perhaps just before the sentence "When you have completed the
distribution specific ...". (The rest of that se
All,
Besides moving distro specific information from the INSTALL file to
something in dists/*, there are some other things I was wondering about:
1) There are still references to the Excel::Template::Plus module;
wasn't that removed from being needed?
2) The modules needed for the testing do
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 10:24 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> Technically we should avoid any distro-specific info in the INSTALL.
> We should call it Module::Install and let people with specific distros
> search for such packages. For example in Fedora, it's called
> perl-module-install. Leave the
All,
I've wondered about this; where does LedgerSMB get the list of
languages it uses? I ask because I noticed that "en_CA" is not listed on
the 'Add Language' page (and also on the templates pages) as an existing
available language but there is a po/en_PO.po file present.
Jame
-
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 04:56 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> 1.3.23-rc1 has been released and can be downloaded
> Please download and test this release and let us know if there are any
> problems.
Happened to notice it now but it's likely to have been there for
awhile; in the msgid for what
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 21:25 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> I will say that if I get my way, I will be writing a generic db
> interface *first* and put that on CPAN, ...
And when that becomes available, I will work on getting it into
Debian so that it's available there and from there to distri
On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 04:27 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> >Also; can I assume that a version 1.2.27 has not been released yet?
>
> That is correct.
Then I won't worry about it
> > There appears to b
Something I noticed when I started thinking about doing an updated
v1.2 series LedgerSMB debian package (to have it install to something
like /usr/share/ledgersmb12) is that while an archive for v1.2.26 was
released; there doesn't seem to be a tag for it in the repository.
Also; can I assume
Something I've been thinking about is what to use for versioned
installation directory naming for LedgerSMB Debian packages; perhaps not
for the standard packages, which currently install
to /usr/share/ledgersmb, but perhaps for optional and/or custom
packages. The idea would be to allow the ins
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 22:20 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> >That issue appears to be back again; happened to be checking the
> > tagged version of 1.3.22 in the repository and noticed that the
> > "version&qu
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 09:58 -0500, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > Chris,
> >
> > It looks there is an issue with the version number setting in the
> > Makefile.PL file again; this time being listed as '1.3.1
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 21:24 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 11:02 -0400, John Locke wrote:
> >> SF is annoying, by comparison...
> >
> > I don't find it so (I've had a
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 07:44 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> Any objection to releasing 1.3.21 tomorrow?
Not really... I built & installed a debian test package for that
version, no problems. I happened to try something (General Ledger|
Reports||Continue) & ended up with an
error but
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 03:07 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi Everyone;
>
> LedgerSMB 1.3.21-rc1 has been released.
>
> This release does include the security fix mentioned before,
Am I just not seeing it, or is that not yet listed in the changelog?
Jame
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 06:53 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Robert James Clay
> wrote:
> > Can you send me more on the workflow that is causing this error?
>
>Sorry, I should have mentioned; the error is coming up when
>
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 11:02 -0400, John Locke wrote:
> [Replying to more appropriate thread...]
>
> What about Github?
>
> Not just for the PHP classes -- the whole project?
Why?
> SF is annoying, by comparison...
I don't find it so (I've had a SourceForge account much
longer but I've a
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 01:35 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Robert James Clay
> wrote:
> > What I'm getting is the "Directory transversal not allowed." error
> > message, with fs_cssdir set to "/var/lib/ledgersmb/css/" i
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 09:19 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 06:26 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 22:20 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> > > A larger question is what should we do with these translation files
> > > general
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 08:58 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 10:28 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > I did get a start on packaging 1.3.19 (which has both upstream & debian
> > related fixes) but ran into an issue with packaging for an upstream
> &
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 10:28 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> I did get a start on packaging 1.3.19 (which has both upstream & debian
> related fixes) but ran into an issue with packaging for an upstream
> change that I haven't had time to resolve.
That change is the one
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 01:51 -0400, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> It is however the reason why I've contacted John this weekend to take
> him up on the offer. We spent quite a bit of time to find a good theme
> and John succeeded at copying over most of the FAQ items. The result
> is this site http://led
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 12:45 -0400, Andres Basile wrote:
> Well, just finished to remove that 12 repeated keys, removed comments
> and added properly summary. I think it is ready to go,
Thanks Andres!
Jame
--
Hi Andres!
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 10:23 -0400, Andres Basile wrote:
> Hello Robert,
> I'm a little lost on what would be the issue. If you could clarify to
> me what would be need, I will be happy to help.
Specific to the locale/po/es_AR.po; it was found by a process that
the Debian Internatio
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 06:26 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 22:20 -0400, Chris Travers wrote in
> ledger-smb-devel mailing list:
> > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > > One of the things available to Debian Package ma
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 22:20 -0400, Chris Travers wrote in
ledger-smb-devel mailing list:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > One of the things available to Debian Package maintainers is a report
> > about possible package translation issues. Checking
One of the things available to Debian Package maintainers is a report
about possible package translation issues. Checking the one for the
LedgerSMB package [1], I found the following files have "fatal errors":
nb.po, fi.po, es_AR.po, ar_EG.po, & es_AR.po. I checked them as they
are in v1.3.18,
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 07:01 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
>All but one of the current bugs in Debian against the LedgerSMB
> package are packaging related.
>The one open bug that is an issue with the application itself is the
> one that has to do with constraint related
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 06:37 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> If you find any issues with it, please feel free to report it if
> has not already been reported [1] and discuss it here as well.
> [1]
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no&src=ledge
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 15:19 -0400, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Accepted:
> ledgersmb_1.3.18-1.debian.tar.gz
> to main/l/ledgersmb/ledgersmb_1.3.18-1.debian.tar.gz
> ledgersmb_1.3.18-1.dsc
> to main/l/ledgersmb/ledgersmb_1.3.18-1.dsc
> ledgersmb_1.3.18-1_all.deb
> to main/l/ledgersmb/ledgersmb
Something I noticed and wondered about while I've been working on db
conversion issues. In the test db I'm using; after the page advising
that a 1.2 db was found and asking if I want to upgrade it, I get a page
about a duplicate vendor number. I fixed that and then get a page like
this:
--
On Sat, 2012-06-09 at 02:57 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 21:38 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> >>Unless you all think it&#x
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 21:38 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 08:04 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> >> And even though the display of the page is coming up correctly with it
> >> set l
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 08:04 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> The css directory is at /var/lib/ledgersmb/css. I've tried having
> "/lsmbcss" aliased to that in /etc/apache2/conf.d/ledgersmb-httpd.conf,
> and cssdir as "/lsmbcss/" in /etc/ledgersmb/ledgers
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 06:29 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Robert James Clay wrote:
>
> > I'll keep working on why I can't seem to get it to work, then.
> > (Besides some documentation updates, it's the last change needed fo
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 19:11 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 09:39 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> >
> >> For example if I set it to:
> >>
> >> cssdir = http://localhost/l
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 09:39 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> For example if I set it to:
>
> cssdir = http://localhost/ledgersmb_trunk/css
>
> I get the CSS files from my trunk install..
So both LedgerSMB and the web server need to be configured properly
for it?
Jame
---
I see the new cssdir configuration items in ledgersmb.conf and
LedgerSMB/Sysconfig.pm (are those the only places?) but how are they
used? They come defaulted to "css/" and I've tried pointing them
to /var/lib/ledgersmb/css but get errors.
Jame
-
Erik,
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 18:42 -0400, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> The difference is that the templates/demo TeX files are meant to be
> processed by LaTeX while the templates/xedemo TeX files are meant to
> be processed by XeLaTeX.
I don't seem to see any Perl module or other requirements relate
All,
What, if anything, is the difference between the usage of the
templates/demo and templates/xedemo directories? I notice that at least
some of the files (both html & tex) in the xedemo directory are the same
as those in the demo directory.
Jame
-
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 11:23 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 10:38 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> >>That looks to be an issue where I was assuming that if a language
> >> specific
Hi Erik!
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 11:18 -0400, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> Actually, it's a runtime check to see if it's available. The check
> tries to load the template processor LedgerSMB::Template::XLS. If that
> fails (which it will if Excel::Template::Plus isn't available) the
> buttons will be sh
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:02 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 09:24 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> >
> >> I have found that I am unable to open the XLS documents generated by
> >>
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 09:24 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> I have found that I am unable to open the XLS documents generated by
> LedgerSMB.
Now that the necessary modules are available in Debian, I was going
to do some testing of that myself. But where is the option of
generating such outpu
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 11:01 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Robert James Clay wrote:
>
> > But not until after that first version migrates to Debian testing, as
> > getting a newer version uploaded before that would start the 10 day
> > w
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 21:49 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > Haven't checked to see how much space they're taking up (there are
> > currently some 61 of them) but those are currently included in the
> > De
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 19:34 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Nigel Titley wrote:
> > On 22/05/2012 16:30, Chris Travers wrote:
> >> I would also like to ensure that it
> >> gets installed as man pages (why I am working on a make
> >> install installation).
> >>
On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 20:02 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
>The 1.3.15-2 package for LedgerSMB has been accepted into Debian
> unstable.
That being accepted and the associated Debian ITP (Intend To
Package) bug being closed also resulted in the Ubuntu "needs-packaging"
b
On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 20:02 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
>The 1.3.15-2 package for LedgerSMB has been accepted into Debian
> unstable.
I do plan to get newer versions of LedgerSMB uploaded...
> I expect that version of the package to migrate to Debian
> testing (wheezy
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 22:55 -0400, Håvard Sørli wrote:
> On 24. april 2012 20:14, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > I'm currently waiting to find out if the current package (1.3.15-2)
> > will get accepted into Debian. I'll post about it if/when it happens.
>
>
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 00:08 -0500, Robert James Clay wrote:
> 2) Regarding the Excel::Template::Plus
That is now in Debian as libexcel-template-plus-perl.
> & Template::Plugin::Latex
That is now in Debian as libtemplate-plugin-latex-perl.
I plan to add them both to the n
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 10:38 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
>The confusion factor for me there is that two of the templates I
> happened to try are not actually present as the files that the
> application is actually searching for:
>
> 1) Quotation - LSMB looks for "quot
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 10:38 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 08:51 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > but the error comes up if I attempt to go to a language specific
> > template for one where the default template is accessible. Are they
> > sup
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 08:51 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 20:58 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 10:28 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> > >> On Tue, May 1, 2012
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 20:58 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 10:28 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Robert
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 10:28 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Robert James Clay wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 03:27 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> >> 1.3.16-rc1 has been released with a number of bugfixes. Please test
> >> it. See t
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 03:27 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> 1.3.16-rc1 has been released with a number of bugfixes. Please test
> it. See the complete changelog below.
> Changelog for 1.3.16
> Chris T is Chris Travers
> Erik H is Erik Huelsmann
> John L is John Locke
> Michael R is Mi
Chris,
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 03:27 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> 1.3.16-rc1 has been released with a number of bugfixes. Please test
> it. See the complete changelog below.
I created a test package for rc1 and installed it via upgrade to one
of my lxc test systems.
> Changelog for 1.3.16
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
