AR: 1100 -- ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, with attribute AR set.
Account: 1010 -- hw cash, with attributes AR_paid & AP_paid.
ario
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 10:28 -0800, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:22 PM, ario wrote:
> > Hi, I'm trying to input a cash receipt of 1,000 into a list of
>
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:38 PM, ERACC Subscriptions wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have had several inquiries about LedgerSMB over the past two years
> from SOHO and SMB companies that have seen our web page here:
>
> http://www.eracc.com/content/accounting-and-point-sale-linux-unix
>
> To date I have
On 31/01/2011 00:06, Luke wrote:
> I'm blind, and also do a non-trivial percentage of work with
> mobile platforms...
Your blind? I guess not completely??
> Maybe interact through XML exchange or the like, to keep it stateless.
JSON and ReST is very popular, and fairly easy to implement.
>> the
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Lyle wrote:
> On 30/01/2011 19:44, Chris Travers wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Lyle wrote:
>>> On 30/01/2011 19:17, Chris Travers wrote:
In 1.3, we are using CGI::Simple and use strict for new code. I
expect these to be used in 2.0 as well. I'd like t
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Lyle wrote:
> You could also define a clear API as
> an alternative to the template based web UI, that way any Perl framework
> or other piece of software in any language for that matter could provide
> a front for Ledger.
Funny, that sort of describes our curr
Hi Folks,
I have had several inquiries about LedgerSMB over the past two years
from SOHO and SMB companies that have seen our web page here:
http://www.eracc.com/content/accounting-and-point-sale-linux-unix
To date I have not been able to implement more than one installation.
Why? No Payroll mod
On 30/01/2011 19:44, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Lyle wrote:
>> On 30/01/2011 19:17, Chris Travers wrote:
>>> In 1.3, we are using CGI::Simple and use strict for new code. I
>>> expect these to be used in 2.0 as well. I'd like to be able to add
>>> compatibility class
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Lyle wrote:
> On 30/01/2011 19:17, Chris Travers wrote:
>> In 1.3, we are using CGI::Simple and use strict for new code. I
>> expect these to be used in 2.0 as well. I'd like to be able to add
>> compatibility classes for Catalyst and others if necessary.
>
> Cat
On 30/01/2011 19:17, Chris Travers wrote:
> In 1.3, we are using CGI::Simple and use strict for new code. I
> expect these to be used in 2.0 as well. I'd like to be able to add
> compatibility classes for Catalyst and others if necessary.
Catalyst is a major pain, it adds needless complexity, qui
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Lyle wrote:
> On 30/01/2011 18:45, Chris Travers wrote:
>> The current approach is:
>>
>> 1) A more formalized object model (either Class::Simple, or Moose based)
>
> Personally I'm not a big fan of Moose, it adds complexity and hampers
> portability across platf
On 30/01/2011 18:45, Chris Travers wrote:
> The current approach is:
>
> 1) A more formalized object model (either Class::Simple, or Moose based)
Personally I'm not a big fan of Moose, it adds complexity and hampers
portability across platforms.
> 2) A re-designed db schema for financial trans
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Lyle wrote:
> Sounds like this one is the way to go then :) I'm also fond of mailing lists
> and not forums, which puts you guys ahead. I'm interested to hear about the
> planned changes for v2.
The changes planned in 2.0 are still being formalized. It will almos
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:22 PM, ario wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to input a cash receipt of 1,000 into a list of
> outstanding accounts receivable, but something goes wrong.
> Here's what I do:
>
> In the list of invoices I select one by clicking the select box, which
> shows checked from then on. T
This may be more of an accountant question than an application usage
question. I'm not sure.
My books are a bit of a mess because I've been using invoices to bill
for a deposit, to cover services which are then invoiced again once
they are rendered. The second invoice documents the actual serv
Sounds like this one is the way to go then :) I'm also fond of mailing
lists and not forums, which puts you guys ahead. I'm interested to hear
about the planned changes for v2.
Lyle
On 30/01/2011 02:42, Luke wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Luke wrote:
The version 2 of LedgerSMB that is in the
15 matches
Mail list logo
