Get used to it mate - Becchio watch is here to stay.
May I recommend the delete button if you don't want to hear how we have sold a
dud to Norwich.
Sent from my iPad
On 10 Mar 2013, at 07:54, Ed Morrish wrote:
> On 10 Mar 2013, at 07:44, Richard Walker wrote:
>
>> Ed, we are Leeds.
>
> Ar
No chance Paul. Becchio watch here to stay.
Lets hear something positive from you Cundell - you miserable old c&nt.
Delete button if you don't want to read it.
Sent from my iPad
On 10 Mar 2013, at 07:59, "Paul Cundell" wrote:
>> No chance Paul. You know things are on the up now the useless Ar
May I recommend a non-lu tag if you insist on posting about Norwich?
Rich W wrote:
> Get used to it mate - Becchio watch is here to stay.
> May I recommend the delete button if you don't want to hear how we have sold
> a dud to Norwich.
___
Leedslis
> Lets hear something positive from you Cundell - you miserable old c&nt.
PotKettle.Black
Interesting how not agreeing with the mighty Rich Wa*ker is construed as
negative.
Unfortunately, I don't have anything positive to say about Norwich. Funnily
enough, neither do you.
_
Oh sorry - surely you know my post is going to be about Becchio so just delete
them all, but I will from now.
I'm not on about disagreeing or agreeing with me just some comment about how
things have improved recently.
I think things are the best for a while. Remember Barnsley ... Seems like a
> I'm not on about disagreeing or agreeing with me just some comment about how
> things have improved recently.
You've been negative for 10 years, I think you've a nerve calling anyone a
negative c@nt.
Improving? The jury is out - 10 points while scoring 6 and conceding 7 goals in
8 games sin
That's bollox Paul. Lets face it , at lot of the last 10 years ain't been the
best especially under Bates and having the likes of Becchio trying to control a
ball and restricting the way we play but there's been some real highs and I
have praised those and I think recent performances are somethi
Haribo ain't no striker believe me.
I think when he's talking about strikers he's talking about the lad Burke from
Brum that he wanted.
Interesting if we had of got him who would he have dropped ? Macca or Varney.
On form at the mo, it might have to be Macca, Varney, whilst been very
frustrati
I agree things are looking up a bit, Warnock has at long last found his
best XI and it is pretty decent. Having said that we will not make the play
offs unless we can start to win away. We also won't make the play offs if
we cannot hold onto a lead. Wolves and Leicester - 4 points thrown away in
in
Rich
Nice to see you giving Collymore stick over his Villa were one of the
original big 6 clubs (Scum, Scousers x 2, Arsenal, Spurs and Villa) and
comparing their attendances in the lower divisions to ours etc
Dave
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and opt
Did they compare cock sizes too?
Sent from my iPhone.
On 10 Mar 2013, at 11:22, David Nattan wrote:
> Rich
> Nice to see you giving Collymore stick over his Villa were one of the
> original big 6 clubs (Scum, Scousers x 2, Arsenal, Spurs and Villa) and
> comparing their attendances in the lower
He was banging on about how Villa had won 20 major titles when Leeds had won
just 7.
When I looked nearly half of them were before 1900.
Villa for me are pretenders, always have been.
He then started having a go at fan loyalty. I pointed out to him that in 85/86
when Villa got relegated to old
Is there a link to this?!!
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Mar 2013, at 19:52, "Richard Walker" wrote:
> He was banging on about how Villa had won 20 major titles when Leeds had won
> just 7.
> When I looked nearly half of them were before 1900.
> Villa for me are pretenders, always have been.
>
>
Have to follow me on Twitter mate. It's just all Becchio diatribe usually.
On 10 Mar 2013, at 12:36, Ian Murray wrote:
> Is there a link to this?!!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 10 Mar 2013, at 19:52, "Richard Walker" wrote:
>
>> He was banging on about how Villa had won 20 major titles whe
Strange mail that, whatever turns you on though.
On 10 Mar 2013, at 11:35, Andy Clayton wrote:
> Did they compare cock sizes too?
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
> On 10 Mar 2013, at 11:22, David Nattan wrote:
>
>> Rich
>> Nice to see you giving Collymore stick over his Villa were one of the
>> o
I am one of your "followers" Rich and I agree most of your tweets are about
Becchio and re-tweets from Norwich or other fans having a go at him.
You do really need help with your obsession with him - he is an ex player
so I have almost zero interest in him.
Glad to see you are looking forward to th
5 years of watching him left its mark Dave. He was garbage and I really think
we can push on now he's gone.
On 10 Mar 2013, at 13:13, David Nattan wrote:
> I am one of your "followers" Rich and I agree most of your tweets are about
> Becchio and re-tweets from Norwich or other fans having a go
He was garbage. Christ do I have to join twitter? I really don't want to. What
are the advantages?
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Mar 2013, at 21:19, "Richard Walker" wrote:
> 5 years of watching him left its mark Dave. He was garbage and I really think
> we can push on now he's gone.
>
> On 10 M
There's a few decent folk worth following and you can sometimes get embroiled
in arguments with Collymore and the likes.
Ross McCormack is value for money at the moment. Very honest saying he's doing
his best but is no right winger and also we're playing better football without
Becchio.
On 10
No , don't join, it is awful
I joined about 12 months ago and very rarely go on it and even rarer do I
post on it.
Only good thing I have done on it is tell Charlie Clamp (youth player at
Leeds United) why we sing Champions of Europe, when as he pointed out we
have never been the actual declared ch
And good to read the Norwich fans as they realise Becchio is a dud.
On 10 Mar 2013, at 13:31, David Nattan wrote:
> No , don't join, it is awful
> I joined about 12 months ago and very rarely go on it and even rarer do I
> post on it.
> Only good thing I have done on it is tell Charlie Clamp (yo
On 10 Mar 2013, at 13:33, Richard Walker wrote:
> And good to read the Norwich fans as they realise Becchio is a dud.
But, as you say, you're not obsessed. So that's good.
Ed.
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk
As I say Ed, 5 years is a long time.
On 10 Mar 2013, at 13:47, Ed Morrish wrote:
> On 10 Mar 2013, at 13:33, Richard Walker wrote:
>
>> And good to read the Norwich fans as they realise Becchio is a dud.
>
> But, as you say, you're not obsessed. So that's good.
>
> Ed.
__
Whatever turns me on? I thought this was all about you?
Arguing on twitter is like the special Olympics, you may win, but you're still
tucking retarded.
Sent from my iPhone.
On 10 Mar 2013, at 12:44, Richard Walker wrote:
> Strange mail that, whatever turns you on though.
>
> On 10 Mar 2013,
I agree with Rich even though I cheered all his goals, I thought Becchio
was lucky that pundits believed the hype that surrounded him and that's
what got him his move to Norwich
But some of the mails lately on the list are just attacks on Rich, which
is sad
Phil
__
Mr Walker needs counselling with his LB obsession. Stopped reading his stuff
now. I don't give a flying f@ck about ex players.
BOYES Philip wrote:
I agree with Rich even though I cheered all his goals, I thought Becchio
was lucky that pundits believed the hype that surrounded him and that's
wh
Watching Varneys pathetic attempt to win a penalty yesterday got me
thinking why we are so much against diving and yet are tolerant or even
supportive of other types of cheating. I am sure we have all yelled at a
player to 'take him down' when an opposition forward is clean through or
cheered when
Can't people see half of the time he's taking the piss?
Sent from my iPhone
On 10 Mar 2013, at 23:05, "BOYES Philip" wrote:
>
> I agree with Rich even though I cheered all his goals, I thought Becchio
> was lucky that pundits believed the hype that surrounded him and that's
> what got him his
Don't blow my cover Ian.
On 10 Mar 2013, at 16:04, Ian Murray wrote:
> Can't people see half of the time he's taking the piss?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 10 Mar 2013, at 23:05, "BOYES Philip" wrote:
>
>>
>> I agree with Rich even though I cheered all his goals, I thought Becchio
>> was
That actually made me laugh.
On 10 Mar 2013, at 14:33, Andy Clayton wrote:
> Whatever turns me on? I thought this was all about you?
>
> Arguing on twitter is like the special Olympics, you may win, but you're
> still tucking retarded.
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
> On 10 Mar 2013, at 12:44, R
A wonderful day out spoilt as usual by a team unable to simply defend a
lead, both their goals were well taken by Murray, but he wasn't meaningfully
challenged for either. Overall Palace were the better team than us in most
areas except commitment, I don't think Palace really fancy the rough and
t
Next year !? we're going up this year.
"Colin Wankers white and yellow army"
Sent from my iPad
On 10 Mar 2013, at 18:31, "Richard Naef"
wrote:
>
>
>
> So another 2 points dropped the playoffs a distant half remembered dream and
> probably just as well. But if we can get rid of Warnock and
Given the shite we have put up with this year, the lack of investment that
EVERYBODY on the list has complained about I personally think that promotion /
play-offs would be wrong. It would show Bates et al, that they were right not
to invest in the team and would (I think) set a precedent about
Yep fair point, but I'd take it.
Sent from my iPad
On 10 Mar 2013, at 20:59, Chris Briggs wrote:
> Given the shite we have put up with this year, the lack of investment that
> EVERYBODY on the list has complained about I personally think that promotion
> / play-offs would be wrong. It would
The problem is that if we were to go up, would the TV money, etc be used to
bolster the team or would it be used to prop up a parent company's balance
sheet? My money would be on the latter.
On 10 Mar 2013, at 21:05, "Richard Walker" wrote:
> Yep fair point, but I'd take it.
>
> Sent from
Warnock out - bring on next season!
Why do "we" (we, warnock, whoever...) believe that we will play and perform
better the next few weeks than the past this season?
No reason to believe that, I reckon... we are mid-table, and there is no
evidence it will change... (of course I'd love to be proven
You are wrong
Chris, we do not need any proof that Bates is a cunt and probably much
more.
I do not like GFH-C. But I wish them success. They need to be given a fair
chance.
As a football 'man' I know that management & pure common sense are worth
more than money. Sure if your skint it won't work. B
37 matches
Mail list logo
