Correct Ed but it will be fuck all.
Sent by Outlook for Android
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:12 AM -0700, "Ed Morrish" wrote:
He's 22 - birthday a week ago - so we'll get a fee for him no matter who
takes him...
Ed.
On 23 September 2015 at 17:08, Phill Shields
wrote:
> I am not deluded eno
He's 22 - birthday a week ago - so we'll get a fee for him no matter who
takes him...
Ed.
On 23 September 2015 at 17:08, Phill Shields
wrote:
> I am not deluded enough to think that for a young player like Byram he has
> ambitions that rest beyond my club and I have to reluctantly accept that.
I am not deluded enough to think that for a young player like Byram he has
ambitions that rest beyond my club and I have to reluctantly accept that. I
still think Byram is playing a the system and his agent is at it in the
background.
Cellino is maintaining that he will not sell him in January b
This is classic Cellino - it's the redders thing all over again. Slag him off
to try to turn the fans against him so they'll accept its for the best when he
gets sold to a premiership team.
He hasn't played well this season but as others have said, he's playing out of
position and the owners try
It's akin to constructive dismissal imho, play him out of position to p him
off, then offer him a pay cut to rub salt in the wounds, then act surprised
when he wants to leave and make out he's the one that's disloyal - I
thought we'd seen the end of cuddly ken!
On 23 September 2015 at 16:52, Jere
True but we were playing in a different league at that point. I guess I'm
saying I'm all for sticking to a budget when it comes to wages and not doing a
Riddle, but then don't complain when you can't retain certain employees.
From: Paul Cundell
Sent: Wednesday
I'd guess Gary Kelly was on a lot more than Byram has been offered.
On 23 Sep 2015 14:59, "Jeremy Adams" wrote:
>
> I do too. Mind you if he was on a salary that was over inflated in
relation to his value to the team then I think it's fair enough to offer
him less money, just don't expect him to
I do too. Mind you if he was on a salary that was over inflated in relation to
his value to the team then I think it's fair enough to offer him less money,
just don't expect him to stay and don't be upset when he tells you to f*ck off.
You're not going to see the "one club" player these days lik
And longer terms.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Andy Clayton wrote:
>
> On 23 September 2015 at 07:09, Phill Shields
> wrote:
>
>> I don't believe for one minute that Leeds were trying to get Byram to sign
>> a new contract offering less money than he is on at the moment.
On 23 September 2015 at 07:09, Phill Shields
wrote:
> I don't believe for one minute that Leeds were trying to get Byram to sign
> a new contract offering less money than he is on at the moment.
>
I do. Murphy was offered a contract on less money. And Accepted.
_
I do. The club want to cash in and elicit sentiment like this from the fans.
He's been wank because he's unsettled.
MOT
Sent from my iPhone
> On 23 Sep 2015, at 21:09, Phill Shields wrote:
>
> I don't believe for one minute that Leeds were trying to get Byram to sign a
> new contract offerin
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 18:09:45 +0100
> From: Paul Cundell
> Subject: Re: [LU] FFS
>
> Seems to me that Byram is right then, take a pay cut and play for a mediocre
> championship side or look for pastures new? I know what I'd be doing.
And isn't it inevitable that good players, pa
Hay reported that . Cellino is a very strange man.
Dr. Michael Benjamin,
Community Psychiatrist,
+972505317772
m...@myray.com
http://www.myray. com
On 23 Sep 2015 14:11, "Phill Shields" wrote:
> I don't believe for one minute that Leeds were trying to get Byram to sign
> a new contract offering
I don't believe for one minute that Leeds were trying to get Byram to sign a
new contract offering less money than he is on at the moment. Sounds like his
agent is at work here.
It's been pretty clear for some time that he has no desire to remain at the
club and wants a big money move. I'd let h
14 matches
Mail list logo