Re: [LU] Reading and Sheff U winners

You are saying you have to be from Yorkshire for the club to be successful? If you aren’t then you don’t “get it”? WTF does Catalonian independence have to do with Green leaving the club? Since May we have our stadium back. That is the biggest step forward this club has made in 15 years. The cl

Re: [LU] Reading and Sheff U winners

Worth having you back for. Spot on. On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 at 00:10, Michael Benjamin wrote: > I am not a knee-jerk sack the manager. All the same, I do believe in > taking responsibility. In an upgraded state of the art salt and pepper pot > interview, we got our surprise head coach. He told a gr

Re: [LU] Reading and Sheff U winners

I am not a knee-jerk sack the manager. All the same, I do believe in taking responsibility. In an upgraded state of the art salt and pepper pot interview, we got our surprise head coach. He told a great tale about sweeper goalies. So we brought in a failed German goalie and let an English intern

[LU] Reading and Sheff U winners

Identicaldo we learn anything ? Interviews Wildernot happy... but wonour clown...rabbit in headlights...time to go TC...out your depth mate. Sent from my iPhone NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail message

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) (Jeremy Thorpe)

You tell me, you’re the Dr.! Michael A. Gardiner LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL A. GARDINER 110 West “A” Street, Suite 950 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: 619.238.9800 Fax: 619.814.3727 E-mail: mgardi...@gardinerlegal.com Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail tra

[LU] "Why do Leeds just hoof the ball forward?"

That's the match review from my 9 year old twin girls. Their first game, and their first step into a life of footballing disappointment. All Leeds Aren't We? All fools more like. Garbage. ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.a

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) (Jeremy Thorpe)

You worry me-- sexual tension. Where's that coming from? -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Michael Gardiner Sent: 27 October 2017 20:25 To: leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] non LU..well, actually, that's the point..LU (is

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Fortress Elland Road. Mattress more like it… just lay down and suck your thumb. Gutless, clueless and guileless. That bloody Centre Forward has to make a real effort to be useless. There is no way this team is going anywhere. There is no logic in any department. The team is unbalanced, there is

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

It may have escaped everyone’s attention, but they are both re-subscribed, and not actually ‘banned’ from the list! Thirkers, on the other hand…… I’ll get my coat From: Rob Heath [mailto:rhe...@hkis.edu.hk] Sent: 28 October 2017 02:04 To: Michael Benjamin Cc: Jeremy Thorpe ; Richard Walker

[LU] Team 4-5-1/ 4-3-2-1 #lufc v Sheffield United: Lonergan, Ayling, Pennington, Cooper, Anita, O'Kane, Vieira, Alioski, Phillips, Saiz, Lasogga.

Sent from my Mobile ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org FLAME WARS 'R US

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish) (Jeremy Thorpe)

Kicking them off? Well that’s ridiculous. Half the entertainment of this list is watching the two of them go back and forth, the sexual tension oozing from every binary digit. Michael A. Gardiner LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL A. GARDINER 110 West “A” Street, Suite 950 San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: 619

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

stop being dramatic. Never apologise, just say fuck it.  We've got the biggest match for years coming up ! We need your mad rantings.  MOT.  Lots of pissed people heading down to ground. Love it.  From: Michael Benjamin To: Jeremy Thorpe ; 'Richard Walker' ; 'Peter Castlehouse' ; 'Rob He

Re: [LU] More importantly

Yes, but not sure we can play him Hernandez and Alioski together in midfield in this kind of game',? For the first time in ages we actually have 1 players who should play, 15 if you count Beradi Maybe we should transfer to rugby union? Sent from my Mobile Original Message Sub

Re: [LU] More importantly

Saiz is a must, no? Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 27, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Richard Naef > wrote: > > I'm hoping we go for a 3 at the back with Ayling and Dallas as wing backs. I > think Dallas has a lot to offer. In midfield, O'Kane is a definite, and > lassogga up front, leaves 3 places to sha

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

I agree! Sent from my iPhone > On 27 Oct 2017, at 13:12, Jeremy Thorpe wrote: > > I second getting them back on. From the initial flame through all Dr Mikes > responses, bloody hilarious. Fabulous cheap entertainment. > > -Original Message- > From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@

Re: [LU] More importantly

He could choose to play Ayling as one of the 3 centre-backs, as I think Alioski has played full back before. So that would mean; LonerganAyling Jansen CooperAlioski OKane Vieira Phillips DallasSaizLasogga If he plays Pennington at CB then Alioski probably drops out as I suspect he'll stick with t

Re: [LU] More importantly

I'm hoping we go for a 3 at the back with Ayling and Dallas as wing backs. I think Dallas has a lot to offer. In midfield, O'Kane is a definite, and lassogga up front, leaves 3 places to share between Saiz, Hernandez, Vieira, Phillips and Alioski. Sent from my Mobile Original Message

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

“Mad Mike” love that. Best regards,Scott. > On 27 Oct 2017, at 13:12, Jeremy Thorpe wrote: > > I second getting them back on. From the initial flame through all Dr Mikes > responses, bloody hilarious. Fabulous cheap entertainment. > > -Original Message- > From: Leedslist [mailto:lee

[LU] More importantly

Do we have a game today? ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org FLAME WARS 'R US

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Just to keep this all going, as it seems about the only active thread in this list. Where does Thirkers now stand in all this? Is he banned too or is his rant all fine? I'm not really bothered either way, just felt like lighting some blue touch paper and standing back since it's just about Guy F

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

I don’t contribute much, but I think you should stay. That post was wonderful. If Heath’s book is as well written as your post I will buy it. It was not nice, but it was funny as hell. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 27, 2017, at 8:59 AM, E Walsh mailto:ejwa...@indigo.ie>> wrote: Personally I thi

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

Personally I think you should stay. I enjoy your comments. Ed Sent from my iPhone > On 27 Oct 2017, at 13:45, Michael Benjamin wrote: > > I don't know where this stands; I may be repeating myself but: > 1. I accept all responsibility. Heath, this time, was completely innocent of > any wrongdo

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

I don't know where this stands; I may be repeating myself but: 1. I accept all responsibility. Heath, this time, was completely innocent of any wrongdoings. He should definitely not be banned. 2. Suffice to say; I had no idea he had written a book. I thought it was (another) dig at me. I was wr

Re: [LU] non LU......well, actually, that's the point......LU (ish)

I second getting them back on. From the initial flame through all Dr Mikes responses, bloody hilarious. Fabulous cheap entertainment. -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of {broken-address} Richard Walker Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 07