And the logo will be in blue anyway. Does it really matter the word Red is
there?
Is this more important than Cellino saying he has had enough?
From: Michael Walsh <mikhong...@gmail.com>
To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [LU] New Shirt S
In the70's LU often played in red. Against Chelsea (circa 72) it was
entirely red. I remember Jackie Charlton 's weedy looking white knees. I
never noticed them in Revies all white
or, previously, in the blue and yellow
Since most televisions were black and white it was the beginning of the end
pc.org>
Subject: Re: [LU] New Shirt Sponsor
Message-ID:
<53471515.2716766.1463132465646.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I really hate / don't get this 'red is Manchester United' way of thinking. To
me it totally over inflates their importance to us
t;paul.re...@mac.com>; "leedslist@gn.apc.org"
<leedslist@gn.apc.org>
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [LU] New Shirt Sponsor
Aha, so it has exercised other minds as well??
Personally, I'm against all these betting firms and the like, so if I was to
have any o
Steve Gillen in 5..4...3.:-)
Hope you're doing ok Steve!
> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 16:29:41 +0300
> From: tedhea...@gmail.com
> To: bruvvalee...@yahoo.co.uk
> CC: leedslist@gn.apc.org; paul.re...@mac.com
> Subject: Re: [LU] New Shirt Sponsor
>
> W
I'm against all these betting firms and the like, so if I was
> to have any objections, it would be about the glut of ways to waste one's
> money!
>
> From: Paul Reeve <paul.re...@mac.com>
> To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
> Sent: Friday, 13 May 2016, 12:51
> Subject: Re:
13 May 2016, 12:51
Subject: Re: [LU] New Shirt Sponsor
I read in YP that the 32 Red logo is changing to blue on the shirts so as not
to upset the fans
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/blue-is-the-colour-as-leeds-united-sponsor-changes-its-logo-to-stop-fans-seeing-red-1-7909599
Cheers
<leedslist@gn.apc.org>
Sent: Friday, 13 May 2016, 13:39
Subject: Re: [LU] New Shirt Sponsor
Don't remember this level of discontent when we were sponsored by Red Kite
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:50 PM, {broken-address} John Lee
<bruvvalee...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org> w
t; From: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>
> To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Sent: Friday, 13 May 2016, 10:41
> Subject: Re: [LU] New Shirt Sponsor
>
> I really hate / don't get this 'red is Manchester United' way of thinking.
> To me it tota
me swear every single time I hear a commentator say
it though!
From: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>
To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
Sent: Friday, 13 May 2016, 10:41
Subject: Re: [LU] New Shirt Sponsor
I really hate / don't get this 'red is Manchester U
I read in YP that the 32 Red logo is changing to blue on the shirts so as not
to upset the fans
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/blue-is-the-colour-as-leeds-united-sponsor-changes-its-logo-to-stop-fans-seeing-red-1-7909599
Cheers
Reeva
___
ist@gn.apc.org>
Sent: Friday, 13 May 2016, 9:22
Subject: Re: [LU] New Shirt Sponsor
Yeah, why not go the whole hog and have Visit Manchester on the shirt??
From: Ted <tedhea...@gmail.com>
To: Brendan Osborne <bosborn...@hotmail.com>
Cc: leedslist <leedslist@gn.ap
Yeah, why not go the whole hog and have Visit Manchester on the shirt??
From: Ted <tedhea...@gmail.com>
To: Brendan Osborne <bosborn...@hotmail.com>
Cc: leedslist <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
Sent: Friday, 13 May 2016, 8:02
Subject: Re: [LU] New Shirt Sponsor
Red? RED?
Red? RED
;-)
On 13 May 2016 9:26 a.m., "Brendan Osborne" wrote:
> 32 RED announced as new shirt sponsor - 3 year deal.
>
>
> http://www.leedsunited.com/news/article/noyxd5aejlkb1pvlojcyix7xq/title/united-announce-new-shirt-sponsor
>
> We'll probably use this money to
32 RED announced as new shirt sponsor - 3 year deal.
http://www.leedsunited.com/news/article/noyxd5aejlkb1pvlojcyix7xq/title/united-announce-new-shirt-sponsor
We'll probably use this money to pay the fine from the previous sponsor ;-)
Ossie.
15 matches
Mail list logo