[LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

https://twitter.com/LeedsUtd1992/status/328474939915116544/photo/1 I assume there was more to it than this. On LUTV highlights this is all he is caught doing on camera - he does it for one or two seconds at most ! Rich N re my meds - yeah am on a high dose of morphine via slow release tablets

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

what law/paragraph is he breaking ? Eric On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:27 AM, nat...@sky.com wrote: > https://twitter.com/LeedsUtd1992/status/328474939915116544/photo/1 > > > I assume there was more to it than this. > On LUTV highlights this is all he is caught doing on camera - he does it > for o

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

" To: nat...@sky.com Cc: "leeds list" Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 4:14:44 PM Subject: Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card what law/paragraph is he breaking ? Eric On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:27 AM, nat...@sky.com wrote: > https://twitter.com/LeedsUtd1992/status/328474

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

> Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 08:57:11 -0700 (PDT) > From: "nat...@sky.com" > To: leeds list > Subject: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card > Message-ID: > > https://twitter.com/LeedsUtd1992/status/328474939915116544/photo/1 If you're offen

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

DRB wrote: > > If you're offended by that, then you must be an easily offended person! > And I fail to see why that's a sending off offence. If an opposition > player had done that at me, I'd have laughed. > > What a load (hand full) of bollocks. > > In the pub post-match, someone said that they

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

list > > Subject: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card > > Message-ID: > > > > https://twitter.com/LeedsUtd1992/status/328474939915116544/photo/1 > > If you're offended by that, then you must be an easily offended person! > And I fail to see why that

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

I would doubt that Diouf is knowledgeable enough about that degree of English cultural sub-texts? From: Ted To: leedslist Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 9:02 AM Subject: Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card DRB wrote: > > If you'

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

>If you're offended by that, then you must be an easily offended person! And I fail to see why that's a sending off offence. If an opposition player had done that at me, I'd have laughed. He ran the full length of the pitch to do it. If players can't keep their temper and are so easily wound up

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

>It does seem unbelievably prissy. Mans game and all that. you'd be happy with a grown man fiddling with his genitals in front of your kids? I'd have thought we'd have had enough of Jimmy Saville doing that in Yorkshire ;) ___ Leedslist mailing lis

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

#x27;" Sent: Monday, 29 April 2013, 13:53 Subject: Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 08:57:11 -0700 (PDT) > From: "nat...@sky.com" > To: leeds list > Subject: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card > Messag

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

right, I still fail to see that he actually broke any rules as its not been mentioned. I dont know all the rules, if any to be honest. they ve changed a lot since I used to ref. 1. Hes entitiled to run where he wants to celebrate but its not ideal to run in front of opposite fans to make gestures

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

Whatever happened, the ref was no idiot. The fact that BMc has publicly chastised him, fined him two weeks wages (maximum allowed) and not appealed the red (they have Rudi's), tells you that he was spot on. Cheers, Andy C Sent from my iPad On 30 Apr 2013, at 01:41, Eric B wrote: > right, I

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

Im not disagreeing he was a twat and deserved punishment from LUFC for starters. I cant see what rule was used for the red card. Can you? E On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Andy Clayton wrote: > Whatever happened, the ref was no idiot. > > The fact that BMc has publicly chastised him, fined him

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

No he's not entitled to run the length of the pitch to celebrate alone by holding his bollocks in front of the away fans. He's clearly doing it to wind up the away fans, and them chanting about him is no excuse. That *is* bringing the game into disrepute wether you agree with the rule or not.

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

; Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 10:49:45 PM Subject: Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card No he's not entitled to run the length of the pitch to celebrate alone by holding his bollocks in front of the away fans. He's clearly doing it to wind up the away fans, and them chanti

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

On 30 Apr 2013, at 01:41, Eric B wrote: > 2. Maybe he was replying to some of the chants from the opposite fans? did > they chant to/about him? Even if they did, so what? He shouldn't have made an obscene gesture to the crowd, should he? Ed. ___ Leed

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

Jim, I am asking questions, right? You ve mentioned the disrepute thing: where is this rule? I couldnt find it on the FIFA site. If/when I take my son to a game and he gets to see something like this I wont flinge. I suspect he wont either. Is it lifechanging for any human being at any age to see

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

Lets stop debating whether it was wrong or not, we all agree it was wrong. For the last time; im not saying he did well. Im asking if the ref. could have fucked up? I am weary that the ref. made shit up on the spot. On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Ed Morrish wrote: > On 30 Apr 2013, at 01:41

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

from FIFA: "sending off offences: a player shall be sent off, if... - serious foul play - Violent conduct - spitting at an opponent/other person - using offensive, insulting or abusive language an

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

: LEEDSLIST Subject: Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card from FIFA: <http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/footballdevelopment/refereeing/81/42/36/law softhegame_2012_e.pdf> "sending off offences: a player shall be sent off, if... - serious foul play - Violent conduct - spitting at

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

It comes to something when you cant check yourself for testicular cancer without being admonished for it That is exactly what I said to the police as they removed me from the balcony of the cinema at a recent screening of 'Wreck-it Ralph ___ Leedslist

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

On 30 Apr 2013, at 09:03, Wayne wrote: > It comes to something when you cant check yourself for testicular cancer > without being admonished for it Actual LOL. Ed. ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/lis

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

I agree nick. Cheers for that. If it was me I d suggest he coughs next time he does this. :-) On 30/04/2013 5:31 PM, "n...@6haroldplace.co.uk" wrote: > ** > from FIFA: > > > http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/footballdevelopment/refereeing/81/42/36/lawsofthegame_2012_e.pdf > > "sending off offenc

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

> Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:54:31 -0600 (MDT) > From: JOHN SYKES > To: Jim Moran > Cc: LEEDSLIST > Subject: Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card > > Exactly right Jim...and to the turkey who believes I am too easily > offendedwrong bud.

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

Alternatively there is disneyland for "politically correct" entertainment. e On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:49 PM, David Brennan wrote: > > Message: 3 > > Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:54:31 -0600 (MDT) > > From: JOHN SYKES > > To: Jim Moran > > Cc: LEEDSLIST

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

ertainment. > > e > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:49 PM, David Brennan wrote: > >>> Message: 3 >>> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:54:31 -0600 (MDT) >>> From: JOHN SYKES >>> To: Jim Moran >>> Cc: LEEDSLIST >>> Subject: Re: [LU

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

ennan Subject: Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card Actually Disneyland is anything but a bastion of political correctness - I had to endure a visit there last year and was completely taken aback at the casual racism and national stereotyping in the It's a small world ride, complete

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

there is disneyland for "politically correct" > entertainment. > > > > e > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:49 PM, David Brennan >wrote: > > > >>> Message: 3 > >>> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:54:31 -0600 (MDT) > >>> From: JOH

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

I think you're looking for "in jest" M In a message dated 01/05/2013 10:51:38 GMT Daylight Time, barl...@gmail.com writes: I dont mind a bit of stereotyping in gist. is the term gist? I think it is. gist = humor? I think u can joke about ANYTHING. I know most people dont but hey.. I ve

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

Yeah but you get the fest Sent from my iPhone On 1 May 2013, at 18:37, markbu...@aol.com wrote: > I think you're looking for "in jest" > > M > > > In a message dated 01/05/2013 10:51:38 GMT Daylight Time, barl...@gmail.com > writes: > > I dont mind a bit of stereotyping in gist. is the ter

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

Gest Sent from my iPhone On 1 May 2013, at 18:44, "Ian Murray" wrote: > Yeah but you get the fest > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 1 May 2013, at 18:37, markbu...@aol.com wrote: > >> I think you're looking for "in jest" >> >> M >> >> >> In a message dated 01/05/2013 10:51:38 GMT Daylight Ti

Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card

g" ; David Brennan Sent: Wednesday, 1 May 2013, 8:28 Subject: Re: [LU] a photo of Diouf that led to red card Actually Disneyland is anything but a bastion of political correctness - I had to endure a visit there last year and was completely taken aback at the casual racism and national