AM
To: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Reeding and Magnate router bits
I was going to mention I really do my design work in CAD, but I try to keep
things simple on this list. I'll have to try out Legacy's method and see if it
saves me any time from what I'm doing
-
From: mwfos...@earthlink.net
To: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:14 PM
Subject: Reeding and Magnate router bits
Mike,
You bring up an interesting point. That generated my question:
How do you determine the correct (most effective
.
-Tim
- Original Message -
From: mwfos...@earthlink.net
To: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:14 PM
Subject: Reeding and Magnate router bits
Mike,
Leads me to ask: Did/does Legacy
looking at what the CAD
model says.
-Tim
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Becker
To: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 10:48 PM
Subject: RE: Reeding and Magnate router bits
In all honesty I didn’t remember where I learned that, I
: Reeding and Magnate router bits
The funny thing is you need to really account as well for the depth of cut and
that is the actual circumference that should be worked with for a perfect part
diameter and bead height...In theory...I'm playing around with this right now.
Depth of cut might
wrong url. Can you send the files as attachments?
- Original Message -
From: Bill Bulkeley
To: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 1:04 AM
Subject: RE: Reeding and Magnate router bits
There is some tutorial on flutes and reeds here
Mac,
As long as you are using set indexes and not using marks you drew on the
surface of the piece, every single cut will be the same. there will be
no chance of large and small spacing. I start by getting my diameter,
minus 1/16 I waste in the cut so 4-1/8 would be 4 I then figure out how
